skip to main content
10.1145/3378184.3378228acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesappisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An RNN-Ensemble approach for Real Time Human Pose Estimation from Sparse IMUs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

With recent advances in various hardware technologies, human motion capturing (MoCap) has gained importance in the fields such as computer vision, computer animation, gesture recognition in gaming, and most importantly in bio-mechanical analysis. In this direction, human motion is being captured using various kinds of sensors. Correspondingly, many model-based and data-based techniques have been developed in order to decode sensor readings into information understandable by a person. Given that the current technologies still lack applicability in real-world scenarios considering cost and ease of information gathering, leaves substantial room for improvement. This article focuses on the development of a novel machine learning based proof of concept for real-time human pose estimation using data collected from sparse inertial measurement units (IMU) system which is cost-effective and least intrusive in the scope of skilled crafts domain. Training diverse bi-directional recurrent neural networks (bi-RNN) with variable window size and building an ensemble of these models to estimate human pose in terms of human-joints' angles more accurately and robustly is discussed.

References

  1. Abdullatif Alwasel, Karim Elrayes, Eihab Abdel-Rahman, and Carl Haas. 2011. Sensing Construction Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, ISARC 2011. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2011/0027Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sheldon Andrews, Ivan Huerta, Taku Komura, Leonid Sigal, and Kenny Mitchell. 2016. Real-time Physics-based Motion Capture with Sparse Sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Visual Media Production (CVMP 2016) (CVMP 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998559.2998564Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Leo Breiman. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine learning 24, 2 (1996), 123--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gavin Brown, Jeremy Wyatt, Rachel Harris, and Xin Yao. 2005. Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation. Journal of Information Fusion 6 (2005), 5--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Maximilian Derouet, Deepak Nagaraj, Erik Schake, and Dirk Werth. 2019. Towards a Digitized Understanding of the Skilled Crafts Domain. In Business Information Systems Workshops, Witold Abramowicz and Rafael Corchuelo (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 435--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yu Guan and Thomas Plötz. 2017. Ensembles of Deep LSTM Learners for Activity Recognition using Wearables. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (Jun 2017), 1--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3090076Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sepp Hochreiter. 1998. The Vanishing Gradient Problem During Learning Recurrent Neural Nets and Problem Solutions. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 6, 2 (April 1998), 107--116. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488598000094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yinghao Huang, Manuel Kaufmann, Emre Aksan, Michael J. Black, Otmar Hilliges, and Gerard Pons-Moll. 2018. Deep Inertial Poser: Learning to Reconstruct Human Pose from Sparse Inertial Measurements in Real Time. ACM Trans. Graph. 37, 6, Article 185 (Dec. 2018), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272127.3275108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Siddharth Joshi and Stephen Boyd. 2009. Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization. Trans. Sig. Proc. 57, 2 (Feb. 2009), 451--462. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2008.2007095Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yuki Kawana, Norimichi Ukita, Jia-Bin Huang, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2018. Ensemble convolutional neural networks for pose estimation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 169 (2018), 62--74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2017.12.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ludmila I. Kuncheva and Christopher J. Whitaker. 2003. Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy. Mach. Learn. 51, 2 (May 2003), 181--207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022859003006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Manohar, B. W. Brunton, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton. 2018. Data-Driven Sparse Sensor Placement for Reconstruction: Demonstrating the Benefits of Exploiting Known Patterns. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 38, 3 (June 2018), 63--86. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2018.2810460Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Liam Paninski. 2005. Asymptotic Theory of Information-Theoretic Experimental Design. Neural Computation 17, 7 (2005), 1480--1507. https://doi.org/10.1162/0899766053723032 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/0899766053723032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Pons-Moll, A. Baak, J. Gall, L. Leal-Taixé, M. Müller, H. Seidel, and B. Rosenhahn. 2011. Outdoor human motion capture using inverse kinematics and von mises-fisher sampling. In 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. 1243--1250. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126375Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Daniel Roetenberg, Henk Luinge, and Per J. Slycke. 2009. Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Robert E Schapire. 1990. The strength of weak learnability. Machine learning 5, 2 (1990), 197--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Paola Sebastiani and Henry Wynn. 2000. Maximum Entropy Sampling and Optimal Bayesian Experimental Design. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 62 (02 2000), 145--157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00225Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Diana Trojaniello, Andrea Cereatti, and Ugo Della Croce. 2013. Comparative Evaluation of Gait Event Detection Methods Based on a Single IMU: Error Sensitivity Analysis to IMU Positioning. In Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation, José L Pons, Diego Torricelli, and Marta Pajaro (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 741--745.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. T. v. Marcard, G. Pons-Moll, and B. Rosenhahn. 2016. Human Pose Estimation from Video and IMUs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 38, 8 (Aug 2016), 1533--1547. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2522398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. T. von Marcard, B. Rosenhahn, M.J. Black, and G. Pons-Moll. 2017. Sparse Inertial Poser: Automatic 3D Human Pose Estimation from Sparse IMUs. Comput. Graph. Forum 36, 2 (May 2017), 349--360. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13131Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Xuesu Xiao and Shuayb Zarar. 2018. A Wearable System for Articulated Human Pose Tracking under Uncertainty of Sensor Placement. In IEEE RAS/EMBS Int. Conf. Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Xsens. 2019.. https://www.xsens.com/products/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An RNN-Ensemble approach for Real Time Human Pose Estimation from Sparse IMUs

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                APPIS 2020: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applications of Intelligent Systems
                January 2020
                214 pages
                ISBN:9781450376303
                DOI:10.1145/3378184

                Copyright © 2020 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 17 February 2020

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader