skip to main content
10.1145/3377713.3377728acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalized Recommendation using Similarity Powered Pairwise Amplifier Network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Online advertising, one typical application of recommendation system, calls for effective and accurate recommendations of keywords. Extreme sparse and large scale data makes online advertising a challenging problem. To achieve better performance and accuracy of the recommendation, a better model with a short turnaround time is needed. In this paper, we address the problem of personalized online advertising for extreme sparse and large scale data. We develop a novel machine learning model (Similarity Powered Pairwise Amplifier Network, SPPAN for short). The complexity of this model (a.k.a. the number of parameters) grows with the amount of observed data, which makes it suitable to extremely sparse data. The training algorithm based on gradient descent makes it easy to parallelize. The similarity model combines the user neighborhood and item neighborhood ideas in collaborative filtering smartly, obtaining a cost-effective way to handle large scale data. The proposed framework is evaluated on a large set of real-world data set from a large internet company (expressed by "Company A"). The experiment results demonstrate that the proposed SPPAN model can greatly improve the prediction and recommendation accuracy on that extreme sparse data set compared with existing approaches.

References

  1. P. Resnick, H. R. Varian, Recommender systems. Commun. ACM. 40, 56--58 (1997)]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, J. Riedl, Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. web Conf., 285--295 (2001)]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Žitnik, B. Zupan, NIMFA: a python library for nonnegative matrix factorization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 849--853 (2012)]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Lin, Projected Gradient Methods for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. Neural Comput. 19, 2756--2779 (2007)]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. D. Lee, H. S. Seung, in Advances in neural information processing systems (2001), pp. 556--562]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J.-P. Brunet, P. Tamayo, T. R. Golub, J. P. Mesirov, Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 4164--4169 (2004)]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, in Recommender systems handbook (Springer, 2011), pp. 1--35]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Koren, R. Bell, in Recommender systems handbook (Springer, 2015), pp. 77--118]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. G. Linden, B. Smith, J. York, Amazon. com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput., 76--80 (2003)]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. X. Cai, M. Bain, A. Krzywicki, W. Wobcke, Y. S. Kim, P. Compton, A. Mahidadia, in Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Springer, 2010), pp. 476--485]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Y. Hu, Y. Koren, C. Volinsky, in international conference on data mining (2008), pp. 263--272]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. A. P. Parambath, Matrix factorization methods for recommender systems (2013)]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Zheng, Q. Li, S. Liao, L. Zhang, in Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (ACM, 2010), pp. 737--738]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Q. Gu, J. Zhou, C. Ding, in Proceedings of the 2010 SIAM international conference on data mining (SIAM, 2010), pp. 199--210]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. L. Baltrunas, B. Ludwig, F. Ricci, in Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems (ACM, 2011), pp. 301--304]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. Cacheda, V. Carneiro, D. Fernández, V. Formoso, Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms: Limitations of current techniques and proposals for scalable, high-performance recommender systems. ACM Trans. Web. 5, 2 (2011)]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Zhang, B. Cao, D.-Y. Yeung, Multi-domain collaborative filtering. arXiv Prepr. arXiv1203.3535 (2012)]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. N. N. Liu, B. Cao, M. Zhao, Q. Yang, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Context-Aware Movie Recommendation (ACM, 2010), pp. 7--13]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personalized Recommendation using Similarity Powered Pairwise Amplifier Network

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ACAI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence
        December 2019
        614 pages
        ISBN:9781450372619
        DOI:10.1145/3377713

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 February 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        ACAI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate97of203submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate173of395submissions,44%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader