skip to main content
10.1145/3364641.3364672acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbqsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Implementation of a Strategy for IT Projects Portfolio Management in the Public Sector in accordance with the MPS Reference Model for Software using Action Research

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Projects are undertaken at all organizational levels, both in the public and private environments, and managing them is not a trivial activity, involving the application of a large amount of knowledge, skills, tools and techniques, in order to better meet requirements agreed between the parties involved. However, in addition to the need of managing projects, one of the major challenges within organizations is how they define which projects are priorities or what is the best combination of projects to achieve strategic business objectives. In this scenario, Project Portfolio Management (PPM) gains importance, becoming the area or process responsible, not only for a specific project, but also for activities that involve the management of an organization's entire portfolio of projects. This type of activity is vital because it has a strong impact on the direction of investments and on the use of certain business opportunities. Nevertheless, researches such as those carried out by the Tribunal de Contas da União, presented a number of concerns regarding the adoption of good practices, present in the PPM, in the area of Information Technology (IT). The purpose of this research was to define, execute and evaluate a strategy for the implementation of the IT Projects Portfolio Management in the public environment, in light of the MPS Reference Model for Software (MR-MPS-SW:2016), in order to improve the practices of a public software development organization and generate knowledge. An Action Research, methodological approach of applied and interventionist nature, which structured the generation of knowledge presented in this work, contributing both to theory and practice, conducted the study. The analysis of the strategy was carried out from the data collection, made by the application of a research questionnaire with the people who executed the PPM strategy.

References

  1. PMI. 2013. Guia do Conhecimento em Gerenciamento de Projetos. [S.l.]: Newton Square (USA): Project Management Institute-PMI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. M. G. Gusmão e C. H. R. Alexandria. 2009. Gestão de Portfólio de Projetos. Engenharia de Software Magazine, Rio de Janeiro, p. 47 -- 56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. SOFTEX. 2016. Guia Geral MPS de Software. [S.l.]: Associação para Promoção da Excelência do Software Brasileiro - SOFTEX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. PMI. 2013. The Standard for Portfolio Management. Third Edition. PMI Publishing Division.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. R. A. Souza. 2013. Um Framework de Processo para Gerência De Portfólio de Projetos de Software com base em Padrões de Qualidade. Dissertação (Mestrado) --- Universidade Federal do Pará, Pará.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. S. Pennypacker. 2005. Project portfolio management maturity model. Center for Business Practices, Havertown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. OGC. 2006. Portfolio, programme and project management maturity model (P3M3). [S.l.]: The Stationery Office London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. GARTNER. 2007. Programme and Portfolio Management Maturity Model. [S.l.]: Gartner RAS Core Research Note G00141742.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. PMI. 2013. Organizational project management maturity model (opm3). In: PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. [S.l.].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ABNT. 2009. Engenharia de Sistemas de Software - Processos de Ciclo de Vida de Software. [S.l.]: ABNT -- ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. R. Costa, M. D. O. Barros, A. R. C. Rocha. 2010. Maturidade em Gerência de Portfolio de Projetos de Software: um estudo experimental. IX Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software, p. 199--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. BRASIL, T. C. U. 2014. Levantamento de governança de ti 2014. p. 94. Disponível em: <http://portal.tcu.gov.br/comunidades/fiscalizacao-de-tecnologia-da-informacao/atuacao/perfil-de-governanca-de-ti/>.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Thiollent. 2011. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. In: Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. [S.l.]: Cortez.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. C. Andion e R. Fava. 2002. Gestão empresarial/fae school. Associação Franciscana de Ensino Bom Jesus, Curitiba.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Kock. 2004. The three threats of action research: a discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study. Decision Support Systems, v. 37, p. 265--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. A. P. Oliveira. 2014. Fatores Envolvidos na Estruturação de um Escritório de Processos em uma Organização Pública: Uma Pesquisa-Ação. Dissertação (Mestrado) --- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. I. Susman e R. D. Evered. 1978. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 23, n. 4, p. 582--603. ISSN 00018392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. A. Medeiros, M. B. L. Júnior, H. A. Cavalcanti, A. C. Rouiller; G. Berbert, e S. R. B. Oliveira. 2015. Implementação dos processos de gerência de reutilização, gerência de conhecimento e gerência de portfólio de projetos usando o redmine: O caso da emprel. Trilha da Indústria -- CBSoft, Belo Horizonte-MG.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Implementation of a Strategy for IT Projects Portfolio Management in the Public Sector in accordance with the MPS Reference Model for Software using Action Research

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SBQS '19: Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality
          October 2019
          330 pages
          ISBN:9781450372824
          DOI:10.1145/3364641

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 October 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          SBQS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate35of99submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate35of99submissions,35%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader