Ana M. Pinto-Llorente
ABSTRACT
This is the second edition of the track Implementation of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in the International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM). The aims of the track are to present the most relevant qualitative studies and those that integrate qualitative and quantitative approaches in research designs, and to provide a space for reflexion.
- F. Conde. 1995. Las perspectivas metodológicas cualitativa y cuantitativa en el context de la historia de las ciencias. In Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales, J. M. Delgado and J. Gutiérrez Fernández, Coords. Síntesis. Madrid, 53--68.Google Scholar
- M. C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2015. La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativo: posibilidades de integración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto. Revista De Educación, 1, 1, 11--30Google Scholar
- E. Bericat. 1998. La integración de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la investigación social. Ariel. Barcelona.Google Scholar
- U. Flick. 2004. Introducción a la Investigación Cualitativa. Morata Madrid.Google Scholar
- U. Flick. 2014. La gestión de la calidad en la investigación cualitativa. Morata. Madrid.Google Scholar
- K. S. Cameron and R. E. Quinn. 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational Culture: Based on the competing values framework. Jossey Bass. Reading, MA.Google Scholar
- K. Charmaz. 2013. Constructing grounded theory. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano-Clark. 2006. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- R. Hernández, C. Fernández and M. P. Baptista. 2014. Metodología de la investigación. McGraw Hill, México.Google Scholar
- J. M. Morse. 2012. Qualitative health research: Creating a new discipline. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
- J. M. Morse and L. Niehaus. 2010. Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
- A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2003. The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences, A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Eds. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA, 671--702.Google Scholar
- A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2008. Introduction to mixed method and mixed model studies in the social and behavioral sciences. In The mixed methods reader, J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano-Clark, Eds. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA, 7--26.Google Scholar
- M. T. Anguera. 2008. Metodologías cualitativas: características, procesos y aplicaciones. In Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales, M. A. Verdugo et al., Coords. Publicaciones INICO, Salamanca, 141--155.Google Scholar
- C. Delgado. 2014. Viajando a Ítaca por los mares cuantitativos, manual de ruta para investigar en grado y en postgrado. Amarú, Salamanca.Google Scholar
- A. Bryman. S. Becker and J. Sempik. 2008. Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal Social Research Methodology, 11, 4, 261--276. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401644.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. C. Greene. 2008. Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 1, 7--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2008. Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In Advances in mixed methods research, M. M. Bergman Ed. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1--7.Google Scholar
- R. Hernández Sampieri and C. P. Mendoza Torre. 2008. El matrimonio cuantitativo cualitativo: el paradigma mixto. In Proceedings of the 6º Congreso de Investigación en Sexología (Instituto Mexicano de Sexología, A. C. y Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, Tabasco, México, 2008), J. L. Álvarez Gayou Ed.Google Scholar
- B. Johnson and L. Christensen. 2008. Educational Research. Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
- B. Johnson and A. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 7, 14--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Johnson, A. Onwuegbuzie and L. Turner. 2007. Toward a definition of Mixed Methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 2, 112--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. L. O'Brien and M. Lebow. 2013. Mixed-methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 8, 1543--1556.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2010. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
- J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- P. Bazeley. 2018. Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- E. G. Creamer. 2017. An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- S. Verdugo-Castro, M. C. Sánchez Gómez, A. García-Holgado and A. P. Costa. 2019. Mixed methods and visual representation of data with CAQDAS: empirical study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Sánchez Santos, A. García-Holgado and M. C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2019. Gender gap in the Digital Society: a qualitative analysis of the international conversation in the WYRED project. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. R. Valenzuela-González. 2019. Mixed methods: Lessons learned from five cases of doctoral theses. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Reflections on Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches
Recommendations
Mixing quantitative with qualitative methods: current practices in designing experiments, gathering data and analysis with mixed methods reporting
OzCHI '17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human InteractionIn this workshop, we set up a discussion on opposing approaches to evaluation methods in order to elicit best practice scenarios. We ask what are the best practice methods being used in the OzCHI community to address the complexities inherent in ...
Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in Social Sciences
TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThis is the third edition of the track Implementation of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in the International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM). The main objective of the track is to specify the ...
Implementation of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches
TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThe objective of the qualitative and quantitative integration in research designs is the reconciliation between paradigms and methods in research in social science. The objective to specify the general epistemological formulations on which qualitative ...
Comments