Madeline Hinckle
Eric Wiebe
ABSTRACT
Computer science (CS) is widely recognized as a field with a significant gender gap despite the growing prevalence of computing. Several factors including CS attitudes, exposure to CS, experience with computer programming, and confidence in using computers are understood to be correlated with the low participation of women in CS. These factors also play an important role in students' interest in CS careers and are particularly crucial during secondary school. However, there is a dearth of research that examines differences in how these factors are inter-correlated for younger students (ages 11-13). The purpose of this study was to generate and test a statistical model that demonstrates the inter-correlation amongst these factors with respect to gender. A total of 260 middle school students participated in this study. Four instruments measuring students' CS attitudes, confidence in using computers, CS conceptual understanding, and prior experience with CS-related activities were used. Structural equation modeling was utilized to test the hypothesized model. The findings showed that previous participation in CS-related activities had a significant direct effect on CS attitudes and confidence in using computers, but the effect on students' CS conceptual understanding was indirect. We also found that in a female specific model, previous participation had a significantly stronger direct effect on CS attitudes compared to its effect in a male specific model. The importance of providing more CS-related experience, especially to female students, as well as suggestions on activities that promote gender equity in the field are discussed.
- Giora Alexandron, Michal Armoni, Michal Gordon, and David Harel. 2012. The effect of previous programming experience on the learning of scenario-based programming. Proceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research - Koli Calling 12 (2012), ACM Press, New York, NY 151--159. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1145/2401796.2401821Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Monica Anderson, Andrew Mckenzie, Briana Wellman, Marcus Brown, and Susan Vrbsky. 2011. Affecting attitudes in first-year computer science using syntax free robotics programming. ACM Inroads 2, 3 (2011), 51--57. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2003616.2003635Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.L. Arbuckle. 2017. Amos, version 25.0. Computer Program. (2017). Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
- Albert Bandura. 1989. Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist 44, 9 (1989), 1175--1184. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mordechai Ben-Ari. 2001. Constructivism in computer science education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 20,1 (2001) 45--73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/274790.274308Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sylvia Beyer and Susan Haller. 2006. Gender differences and intra-gender differences in computer science students: Are female CS majors more similar to male CS majors or female nonmajors?. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 12, 4 (2006), 337--365. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v12.i4.50Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert F. DeVellis. 2017. Scale development: theory and applications 4th ed., Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Oliver Dickhäuser and Joachim Stiensmeier-Pelster. 2003. Gender Differences in the Choice of Computer Courses: Applying an Expectancy-Value Model. Social Psychology of Education 6, 3 (2003), 173--189.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Allan Wigfield. 2002. Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 1 (2002), 109--132. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153Google ScholarCross Ref
- Darren George and Paul Mallery. 2010. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0 update 10a ed., Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Shuchi Grover and Satabdi Basu. 2017. Measuring student learning in introductory block-based programming: Examining misconceptions of loops, variables, and Boolean logic. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE 17 (2017). ACM Press, New York, NY. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017723Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Guzdial, Barbara J. Ericson, Tom Mcklin, and Shelly Engelman. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences. Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research - ICER 12 (2012), 143--150. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361304Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian Harrington, Shichong Peng, Xiaomeng Jin, and Minhaz Khan. 2018. Gender, confidence, and mark prediction in CS examinations. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - ITiCSE 2018 (2018), ACM Press, New York, NY, 230--235. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197116Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jun He and Lee Freeman. 2010. Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education 2, 21 (2010), 203--212.Google Scholar
- Alice Y. Kolb and David A. Kolb. 2009. The Learning Way. Simulation & Gaming 40, 3 (October 2009), 297--327. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713Google ScholarDigital Library
- David A. Kolb. 1984. Experiential learning: experience as a source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Robert Lent, Steven Brown, and Gail Hackett. 2002. Social cognitive career theory. In Career Choice and Development (2002), Duane Brown and Associates, 255--311.Google Scholar
- Colleen M. Lewis. 2010. How programming environment shapes perception, learning and goals. Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE 10 (2010), ACM Press, New York, NY, 346--350. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734383Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim Lewis. 2018. Gender-gaps, gender-based social norms, and conditioning from the vantage point of leadership theories. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 14, 3 (2018), 17--25.Google Scholar
- Allison Master, Sapna Cheryan, Adriana Moscatelli, and Andrew N. Meltzoff. 2017. Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 160 (2017), 92--106. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Assessing and responding to the growth of computer science undergraduate enrollments. The National Academies Press. Washington, DC. DOI : https://doi.org/10.17226/24926Google Scholar
- Hoi Kwan Ning and Kevin Downing. 2012. Influence of student learning experience on academic performance: the mediator and moderator effects of self-regulation and motivation. British Educational Research Journal 38, 2 (2012), 219--237. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.538468Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yizhou Qian and James D. Lehman. 2016. Correlates of Success in Introductory Programming: A Study with Middle School Students. Journal of Education and Learning 5, 2 (2016), 73--83. DOI : http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p73Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arif Rachmatullah, Bita Akram, Danielle Boulden, Bradford Mott, Kristy Boyer, James Lester, and Eric Wiebe. 2020. Development and validation of the middle grades computer science concept inventory (MG-CSCI) assessment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16, 5 (2020), 1--11. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116600Google Scholar
- Marcos Román-González, Jesús Moreno-León, and Gregorio Robles. 2019. Combining Assessment Tools for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Computational Thinking Interventions. Computational Thinking Education (2019), 79--98. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1007/978--981--13--6528--7_6Google Scholar
- Marcos Román-González, Juan-Carlos Pérez-González, Jesús Moreno-León, and Gregorio Robles. 2018. Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors. Computers in Human Behavior 80 (2018), 441--459. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Rozell and William L. Gardner III. 2000. Cognitive, motivation, and affective processes associated with computer-related performance: a path analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 16, 2 (2000), 199--222. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0747--5632(99)00054-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melissa Sandgren. 2014. When glass ceilings meet glass walls. Kennedy School Review 14, (2014), 39--46Google Scholar
- James Schreiber, Amaury Nora, Frances Stage, Elizabeth Barlow & Jamie King. 2006. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research 99, 6 (2006), 323--338. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323--338Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lily Shashaani. 1994. Gender-Differences in Computer Experience and its Influence on Computer Attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 11, 4 (1994), 347--367. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/64md-htkw-pdxv-rd62Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leslie P. Steffe and Jerry Gale. 1995. Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Harriet G. Taylor and Luegina C. Mounfield. 1994. Exploration of the Relationship between Prior Computing Experience and Gender on Success in College Computer Science. Journal of Educational Computing Research 11, 4 (1994), 291--306. DOI : http://doi.org/10.2190/4u0a-36xp-eu5k-h4kvGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Keith Trigwell, Paul Ashwin, and Elena S. Millan. 2012. Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 3 (2012), 363--378. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044--8279.2012.02066.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Alana Unfried, Malinda Faber, Daniel S Stanhope, and Eric Wiebe. 2015. The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 7 (2015), 622--639. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915571160Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Wiebe, Alana Unfried, and Malinda Faber. 2018. The relationship of STEM attitudes and career interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14, 10 (2018), 1--17. DOI : https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92286Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The Relationship of Gender, Experiential, and Psychological Factors to Achievement in Computer Science
Recommendations
Gender influences on school students' mental models of computer science: a quantitative rich picture analysis with sixth graders
GenderIT '18: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & ITDespite great efforts, women are underrepresented in computer science and other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. To understand the root of this we studied 112 high school students (51 female, 61 male) aged between 10 to 13 ...
Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program
The proportion of computer science (CS) bachelor's degree recipients who are women has consistently been small and is declining. This study investigates factors that predict performance and persistence in an undergraduate CS program and explores why ...
Student Psychological Factors and Diversity in Computer Science Education
SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationUnderrepresentation of women and Black and Latinx individuals in computer science (CS) is a well-documented issue facing university training programs and the field in general. In an effort to expand on current knowledge and help bridge the equality gap ...
Comments