skip to main content
10.1145/3341161.3343690acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Concept drift in bias and sensationalism detection: an experimental study

Published:15 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to easy dissemination of news in social media and the Web, there has been an increasing rise of disinformation on important political issues like elections in recent years. Computational solutions for automatic bias and sensationalism detection for news articles can have tremendous impact if used in the right way. Because news is an ever-shifting domain, concept drift is an issue that must be dealt with in any real-world computational news classification system that relies on features and trained machine learning models. Yet, an empirical study of concept drift in such systems, especially popular systems released recently as open-source and used within organizations, has been lacking thus far. This short paper reports results on an empirical study specifically designed to assess concept drift, using an open-source, popular computational news classification system, on real news data crawled from the Web. We find that even a gap of two years (2017 vs. 2019) can lead to significant concept drift, a far narrower gap than observed in traditional machine learning domains, making deployment of pre-trained or openly available computational news classification models an ethically suspect issue.

References

  1. B. Martens, L. Aguiar, E. Gómez, and F. Mueller-Langer, "The digital transformation of news media and the rise of disinformation and fake news," 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Floridi, "Brave. net. world: the internet as a disinformation superhighway?" The Electronic Library, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 509--514, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Faris, H. Roberts, B. Etling, N. Bourassa, E. Zuckerman, and Y. Benkler, "Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 us presidential election," 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. J. Conroy, V. L. Rubin, and Y. Chen, "Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news," Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1--4, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. V. Pérez-Rosas, B. Kleinberg, A. Lefevre, and R. Mihalcea, "Automatic detection of fake news," arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07104, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Rubin, N. Conroy, Y. Chen, and S. Cornwell, "Fake news or truth? using satirical cues to detect potentially misleading news," in Proceedings of the second workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, 2016, pp. 7--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Widmer and M. Kubat, "Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts," Machine learning, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 69--101, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Gama, I. Žliobaitė, A. Bifet, M. Pechenizkiy, and A. Bouchachia, "A survey on concept drift adaptation," ACM computing surveys (CSUR), vol. 46, no. 4, p. 44, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. J. Conroy, V. L. Rubin, and Y. Chen, "Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news," Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1--4, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ASONAM '19: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
    August 2019
    1228 pages
    ISBN:9781450368681
    DOI:10.1145/3341161

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    ASONAM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of286submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

    Upcoming Conference

    KDD '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader