skip to main content
10.1145/3341105.3374093acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Chaining model transformations to develop a system model verification tool: application to capella state machines and data flows models

Published:30 March 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the context of model-based system engineering (MBSE), the need emerges for model verification tools aiming at detecting inconsistencies in the dynamic behavioral aspect of the design. In this paper, a model-based approach is proposed to develop model verification tools. The approach allows targeting different semantics and facilitates the reuse of legacy semantics. The idea is to enforce separation of concerns, by progressively defining a behavioral semantic through a chain of five model transformation steps. The approach ensures traceability between source models and target models, facilitating the interpretation of the verification results. We apply the approach to develop a tool to verify Capella models, allowing simulation of the data flow and state machines diagrams in order to verify their coherency. An experimentation on a clock-radio case study demonstrates the ability of the generated tool to catch design inconsistencies.

References

  1. [n. d.]. Acceleo. https://www.eclipse.org/acceleo/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrea Sindico, Marco Di Natale, and Giampiero Panci. 2001. Integrating SysML with Simulink using Open-source Model Transformations.. In 1st Int. Conf. on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMUL-TECH'11). Noordwijekr, The Netherlands, 45--56. http://retis.sssup.it/~marco/papers/2011/simultech.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassim Chabibi, Adil Anwar, and Mahmoud Nassar. 2018. Towards a Model Integration from SysML to MATLAB/Simulink. Journal of Software (2018), 630--645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Benoit Combemale, Cédric Brun, Joël Champeau, Xavier Crégut, Julien Deantoni, and Jérome LE Noir. 2016. A Tool-Supported Approach of Concurrent Execution Of Heterogeneous Models. In 8th European Congress on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS 2016). Toulouse. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01258358Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benoit Combemale, Xavier Crégut, Pierre-Loïc Garoche, and Xavier Thirioux. 2009. Essay on Semantics Definition in MDE An Instrumented Approach for Model Verification. journal of Software (Nov. 2009), 943--958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cécile Hardebolle and Frédéric Boulanger. 2009. Multi-Formalism Modelling and Model Execution. International Journal of Computers and Applications 31, 3 (2009), 193--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Edward. A. Lee and David. G. Messerschmitt. 1987. Synchronous data flow. Proc. IEEE 75, 9 (Sep. 1987), 1235--1245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Erwan Bousse, Thomas Degueule, Didier Vojtisek, Tanja Mayerhofer, Julien Deantoni, and Benoit Combemale. 2016. Execution Framework of GEMOC Studio (Tool Demo). In ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering. ACM, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 84--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jean-Luc. Voirin. 2017. Model-based System and Architecture Engineering with the Arcadia Method. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jim Steel and Jean-Marc Jézéquel. 2007. On model typing. Software & Systems Modeling 6, 4 (Dec. 2007), 401--413. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. José E. Riviera and Antonio Vallecillo. 2007. Adding Behavioral Semantics to Models. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference. IEEE, Annapolis, MD, USA, 169--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kai Chen, Janos Sztipanovits, Sherif Abdelwalhed, and Ethan Jackson. 2005. Semantic Anchoring with Model Transformations. In Model Driven Architecture, Foundations and Applications (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Alan Hartman and David Kreische (Eds.), Vol. 3748. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Nuremberg, Germany, 115--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Levi Lúcio, Moussa Amrani, Juergen Dingel, Leen Lambers, Rick Salay, Gehan M. K. Selim, Eugene Syriani, and Manuel Wimmer. 2016. Model transformation intents and their properties. Software & Systems Modeling 15, 3 (01 Jul 2016), 647--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paola Vallejo, Jean-Philippe Babau, and Mickaèl Kerboeuf. 2016. ModifRoundtrip: A Model-Based tool to reuse legacy transformations. In MoDELS 2016 Demo and Poster Sessions co-located with ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2016). IEEE Xplore, Saint Malo, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pascal Roques. 2017. System Architecture Modeling with the Arcadia Method: A Practical Guide to Capella. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Slim Medimegh, Jean-Yves Pierron, and Frédéric Boulanger. 2018. Qualitative Simulation of Hybrid Systems with an Application to SysML Models. In 6 th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Funchal Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wuliang Sun, Benoit Combemale, Steven Derrien, and Robert B. France. 2013. Using Model Types to Support Contract-Aware Model Substitutability. In Modelling Foundations and Applications (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Pieter Van Gorp, Tom Ritter, and Louis M. Rose (Eds.), Vol. 7949. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Montpellier, France, 118--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Chaining model transformations to develop a system model verification tool: application to capella state machines and data flows models

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '20: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2020
        2348 pages
        ISBN:9781450368667
        DOI:10.1145/3341105

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 March 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader