skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331371acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

NRPA: Neural Recommendation with Personalized Attention

Published:18 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing review-based recommendation methods usually use the same model to learn the representations of all users/items from reviews posted by users towards items. However, different users have different preference and different items have different characteristics. Thus, the same word or the similar reviews may have different informativeness for different users and items. In this paper we propose a neural recommendation approach with personalized attention to learn personalized representations of users and items from reviews. We use a review encoder to learn representations of reviews from words, and a user/item encoder to learn representations of users or items from reviews. We propose a personalized attention model, and apply it to both review and user/item encoders to select different important words and reviews for different users/items. Experiments on five datasets validate our approach can effectively improve the performance of neural recommendation.

References

  1. Chong Chen, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Neural attentional rating regression with review-level explanations. In WWW. 1583--1592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Donghyun Kim, Chanyoung Park, Jinoh Oh, Sungyoung Lee, and Hwanjo Yu. 2016. Convolutional matrix factorization for document context-aware recommendation. In RecSys. 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Greg Linden, Brent Smith, and Jeremy York. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. Internet Computing (2003), 76--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yichao Lu, Ruihai Dong, and Barry Smyth. 2018. Coevolutionary Recommendation Model: Mutual Learning between Ratings and Reviews. In WWW. 773--782. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andriy Mnih and Ruslan R Salakhutdinov. 2008. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In NIPS. 1257--1264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Steffen Rendle. 2010. Factorization machines. In ICDM. 995--1000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chong Wang and David M Blei. 2011. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In KDD. 448--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Xianchen Wang, Hongtao Liu, Peiyi Wang, Fangzhao Wu, Hongyan Xu, Wenjun Wang, and Xing Xie. 2019. Neural Review Rating Prediction with Hierarchical Attentions and Latent Factors. In DASFAA. 363--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Junxin Liu, and Yongfeng Huang. 2019. Hierarchical User and Item Representation with Three-Tier Attention for Recommendation. In NAACL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lei Zheng, Vahid Noroozi, and Philip S Yu. 2017. Joint deep modeling of users and items using reviews for recommendation. In WSDM. 425--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. NRPA: Neural Recommendation with Personalized Attention

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2019
      1512 pages
      ISBN:9781450361729
      DOI:10.1145/3331184

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 July 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate84of426submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader