skip to main content
10.1145/3330482.3330505acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of the Selected Philippine E-Government Websites' Performance with Prescriptive Analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have the potential to transform the political landscape by engaging citizens in the governance process. The conduct of valuation on Government websites' performance, acclimates to our country's productivity development of the government requirements, contributes to promoting the government websites of constant improvement on quality service. Besides, there are insufficient studies in the country to support the practice in websites' performance evaluation. Using automated testing tools, this paper aims to evaluate the performance of the selected Philippine e-government websites. Moreover, it sought to identify evaluation tool with common parameters in assessment using comparative analysis and illustrates recommendations to improve the web performance using prescriptive analysis. Results show that Website Grader, GTMetrix and the Pingdom Tool have common parameters to evaluate websites' performance. Moreover, this paper shows that recommendations from prescriptive analysis is suited for the improvement of an e-government website and offers the best solutions. These findings could offer new insights for academic researchers, government agencies, and practitioners, to measure e-government satisfaction and its impact upon citizen trust.

References

  1. Salmi, M. and Hasnan, N. (2016) E-Government Analysis: Sultanate of Oman Case. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 35--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. ADB (2013) Empowerment and Public Service Delivery in Developing Asia. Policy Report. {Citation Time(s):2}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Karunasena, K. and Deng, H. (2012) A Citizen-Oriented Approach for Evaluating the Performance of E-Government in Sri Lanka. International Journal of E-Government Research, 8, 44--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. Bai, "A Public Value Based Framework for Evaluating the Performance of e-Government in China," iBusiness, Vol. 5 No. 3B, 2013, pp. 26--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sharma, P.N. et, al., 2018, An Empirical and Comparative Analysis of E-Government Performance Measurement Models: Model Selection via Explanation, Prediction, and Parsimony, Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Brandus, Healthcare.gov, Obama's Cratering Popularity, and the Democrats' Big 2014 Problem. TheWeek.com, December 2, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. B. McLean, Accounting for Obamacare: Inside the company that built Healthcare.gov Vanity Fair (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Parajuli J (2007) "A Content Analysis of Selected Government Web Sites: a Case Study of Nepal" The Electronic Journal of e-Government Volume 5 Issue 1, pp 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bend, J. (2004) Public Value and E-Health. Institute of Public Policy Research, London. {Citation Time(s):1}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bai, W. (2013) A Public Value Based Framework for Evaluating the Performance of E-Government in China. Journal of iBusiness, 5, 26--29. {Citation Time(s):8}Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. eGEP (2006) Measurement Framework: Final Version, E-Government Economics Project. European Commission, Brussels. {Citation Time(s):4}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alsaghier, H., Ford, M., Nguyen, A. and Hexel, R. (2009) Conceptualizing Citizen's Trust in E-Government: Application of Q Methodology. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7, 295--310. {Citation Time(s):7}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heeks, R. (2008) Benchmarking E-Government: Improving the National and International Measurement Evaluation and Comparison of E-Government. In: Evaluation of Information Systems, Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann. {Citation Time(s):5}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gartner retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/it-governance/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Techopedia retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/19641/information-technology-governance-it-governance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fink, K., and C. Ploder, January 2008, Decision support framework for the implementation of IT-governance," Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 432--441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lagura, G. B. 2017, 'e-Governance in Davao Region: An assessment of City Government Websites', Journal of Public Administration and Governance, vol. 7, no. 3, pp 133--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. GARTNER Forecast Snapshot: Prescriptive Analytics, Worldwide, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lallana, E., Pascual, P.J., Soriano, E.S. (2012), "e-Government in the Philippines: Benchmarking Against Global Best Practices". http://www.digitalphilippines.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramiscal, Dr. Atty. Noel G., "The Government Service Insurance System Website Is Not Secure", Philippine Law Bytes: TheCyberLawyer Issues by Dr. Attorney Noel Guivani Ramiscal, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Deng, H, (2012) Critical Factors for Evaluating the Public Value of E-Government in Sri Lanka, Government Information Quarteerly, 29, 74--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kocakusak Diren, 2014, What is Website Performance and Why is it Important, instantShift. Retrieved from http://www.instantshift.com/2014/06/16/website-performance-tools/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Crystal, Greg, Easy ways to Help Reduce Webite's Page Loading Speed, July 24, 2018. Retrieved from https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/how-to-reduce-your-websites-page-speedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Akamai. Stream Analyzer Service Description. 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.akamai.com/dl/feature_sheets/Stream_Analyzer_Seervice_Description.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Vaughan, Pamela, Website Grader Analyzes Over 2 Million Sites, June 27, 2010. Retrieved from https://www.hubspot.com/blog/bid/5539/Website-Grader-Analyzes-Over-2-Million-Sites?_ga=2.76602389.161355755.1539526850-214328295.1537520481Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Winsauer, Emily, The Hubspot Website Grader: How does your Site Score?, May 4, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.vieodesign.com/blog/using-hubspot-marketing-grader-measure/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Iglesias,G. (2010) "E-government Initiatives of Four Philippine Cites" Globalization, Governance and the Philippine State, S. No. 2010-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Siar, S. (2007). E-Governance at the Local Government Level in the Philippines: An Assessment of City Government Websites. Retrieved January 7, 2013 from Philippine Institute for Development Studies Website: http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/pjd/pidspjd05-2egovernance.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaur, Sukhpuneet & Kaur, Kulwant & Kaur, Parminder. (2016). An Empirical Performance Evaluation of Universities Website. International Journal of Computer Applications. 146. 10--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Huffman B.D., E-Participation in the Philippines: A Capabilities Approach to Socially Inclusive Governance, Journal of Democracy and Open Government, Vol 9, No 2 (2017), pp 23--46Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Atterer, R., Wnuk, M., & Schmidt, A. 2006. Knowing the user's every move: user activity tracking for website usability evaluation and implicit interaction. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 203--212). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. I. Anwarul & K Tsuji. 2011. "Evaluation of usage of university websites in Bangladesh". DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology,Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 469--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. S. N. Junaini. 2001. "Navigation design and usability evaluation of the Malaysianpublic university websites," in Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Cognitive Science CSC, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. 31--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. R. Alexander & B. Andres. 2011. "Automated usability testing: AnalysingAsia websites,"{Online. Available http://www.arxiv.org/pdf/12http://www.arxiv.org/pdf/1212.349} (accessed 7 June, 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Carly Stec, "How to Reduce Page Weight on Your Website", Published: August 21, 2015, Updated January 03, 2018, Hubspot. Retrieved from https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/reducing-page-sizeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Prescriptive Analytics. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prescriptive-analytics.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. AJ Segal, "How do you improve the performance of a website?", December 26, 2017, Qoura. Retrieved from: https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-improve-the-performance-of-a-website.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ralph Eck, "8 Ways to Improve Your Website Perfromance", November 06, 2017, Monitis -- A TeamViewer Company. Retrieved from: http://www.monitis.com/blog/8-ways-to-improve-your-website-performance/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Syed Balkhi, How to Use GTMetrix Plugin ti Improve WordPress Site Performance, August 8, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.wpbeginner.com/plugins/how-to-use-gtmetrix-plugin-to-improve-wordpress-site-performance/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Cody Reichert, Why Pingodm isn't enough for me today?, June 7, 2017. Retrieved from, https://hackernoon.com/why-pingdom-wasnt-enough-for-me-today-6153e1780c05Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajeck Jeff, "Analytical Approaches Every Marketer Should Know #4: Prescriptive Analytics", August 5, 2017, Econsultancy. Retrived from: https://econsultancy.com/analytics-approaches-every-marketer-should-know-4-prescriptive-analytics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of the Selected Philippine E-Government Websites' Performance with Prescriptive Analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCAI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence
      April 2019
      267 pages
      ISBN:9781450361064
      DOI:10.1145/3330482

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader