skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376658acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Social Network: How People with Visual Impairment use Mobile Phones in Kibera, Kenya

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Living in an informal settlement with a visual impairment can be very challenging resulting in social exclusion. Mobile phones have been shown to be hugely beneficial to people with sight loss in formal and high-income settings. However, little is known about whether these results hold true for people with visual impairment (VIPs) in informal settlements. We present the findings of a case study of mobile technology use by VIPs in Kibera, an informal settlement in Nairobi. We used contextual interviews, ethnographic observations and a co-design workshop to explore how VIPs use mobile phones in their daily lives, and how this use influences the social infrastructure of VIPs. Our findings suggest that mobile technology supports and shapes the creation of social infrastructure. However, this is only made possible through the existing support networks of the VIPs, which are mediated through four types of interaction: direct, supported, dependent and restricted.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a529-barbareschi-presentation.mp4

mp4

48.4 MB

References

  1. Ilias Apostolopoulos, Navid Fallah, Eelke Folmer, and Kostas E. Bekris. 2014. Integrated Online Localization and Navigation for People with Visual Impairments Using Smart Phones. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 3, 4 (January 2014), 21:1--21:28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2499669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shiri Azenkot, Richard E. Ladner, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. Smartphone Haptic Feedback for Nonvisual Wayfinding. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 281--282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049607Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence As a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 161--173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Timothy Bickmore and Justine Cassell. 2001. Relational Agents: A Model and Implementation of Building User Trust. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 396--403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Timothy W. Bickmore and Rosalind W. Picard. 2005. Establishing and Maintaining Long-term Human-computer Relationships. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12, 2 (June 2005), 293--327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Julia Bird, Piero Montebruno, and Tanner Regan. 2017. Life in a slum: understanding living conditions in Nairobi's slums across time and space. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 33, 3 (2017), 496--520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2373--2382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702511Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 163--171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 2 (January 2006), 77--101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Margot Brereton, Paul Roe, Ronald Schroeter, and Anita Lee Hong. 2014. Beyond Ethnography: Engagement and Reciprocity As Foundations for Design Research out Here. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1183--1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Robin N. Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2019. Understanding Trust, Transportation, and Accessibility Through Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 195:1--195:11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300425Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Maria Claudia Buzzi, Marina Buzzi, Barbara Leporini, and Amaury Trujillo. 2014. Designing a Text Entry Multimodal Keypad for Blind Users of Touchscreen Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661354Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Clare Carroll, Catherine Chiodo, Adena Xin Lin, Meg Nidever, and Jayanth Prathipati. 2017. Robin: Enabling Independence For Individuals With Cognitive Disabilities Using Voice Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 46--53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3049266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Marshini Chetty and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2007. HCI4D: Hci Challenges in the Global South. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2327--2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Linfeng Li, and Tanya Rosenblat. 2017. Uncovering the Values and Constraints of Real-time Ridesharing for Low-resource Populations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2757--2769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kevin Doughty. 2011. SPAs (smart phone applications) -- a new form of assistive technology. J. Assist. Technol. (June 2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/17549451111149296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int. J. Qual. Methods 5, 1 (2006), 80--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Emiliano Firmino and Mauro Teófilo. 2013. Visually impaired navigation assistant for emerging market using tactile floor, feature phone and audio descriptions. ACM, 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2537052.2537072Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Harold Garfinkel. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood cliffs. Prentice-Hall (1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishita Ghosh. 2013. The agent in a transformational m-banking ecosystem: interface or intermediary? In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes-Volume 2, ACM, 33--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ishita Ghosh. 2016. Contextualizing Intermediated Use in the Developing World: Findings from India & Ghana. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 355--359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jonathan Grudin. 1990. The Computer Reaches out: The Historical Continuity of Interface Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '90), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. GSMA. 2019. Understanding the mobile disability gapInsights on mobile phone access and usage by persons with disabilities in Kenya and Bangladesh. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/GSMA_Understanding-the-mobile-disability-gap_116pg_Accessible.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. João Guerreiro, Dragan Ahmetovic, Daisuke Sato, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2019. Airport Accessibility and Navigation Assistance for People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 16:1--16:14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300246Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lilit Hakobyan, Jo Lumsden, Dympna O'Sullivan, and Hannah Bartlett. 2013. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Surv. Ophthalmol. 58, 6 (December 2013), 513--528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Catherine Holloway. 2019. Disability interaction (DIX): A manifesto. ACM Interact. 26, 2 (February 2019) (2019), 44--49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3310322Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Catherine Holloway, Victoria Austin, Giulia Barbareschi, and Ramos. 2018. Scoping research Report on Assistive Technology. On the road for universal assistive technology coverage. Prepared by the GDI Hub & partners for the UK Department for International Development. Global Disability Innvoation Hub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hernisa Kacorri, Kris M. Kitani, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. People with Visual Impairment Training Personal Object Recognizers: Feasibility and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5839--5849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025899Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, Sile O'Modhrain, Tiffany C. Veinot, Robin Brewer, Aakanksha Parameshwar, Vidhya Y, and Jacki O'Neill. 2018. "We Can Go Anywhere": Understanding Independence Through a Case Study of Ride-hailing Use by People with Visual Impairments in Metropolitan India. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact 2, CSCW (November 2018), 85:1--85:24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3274354Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to Roam: A Study of Mobile Device Adoption and Accessibility for People with Visual and Motor Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets '09), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115--122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Seita Kayukawa, Keita Higuchi, João Guerreiro, Shigeo Morishima, Yoichi Sato, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2019. BBeep: A Sonic Collision Avoidance System for Blind Travellers and Nearby Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 52:1--52:12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Faith N. Kibere. 2016. The paradox of mobility in the Kenyan ICT ecosystem: An ethnographic case of how the youth in Kibera slum use and appropriate the mobile phone and the mobile internet. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22, sup1 (2016), 47--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Frank Chun Yat Li, David Dearman, and Khai N. Truong. 2010. Leveraging Proprioception to Make Mobile Phones More Accessible to Users with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 187--194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Theresa Lorenzo. 2003. No African renaissance without disabled women: a communal approach to human development in Cape Town South Africa. Disabil. Soc. 18, 6 (October 2003), 759--778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000119505Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Theresa Lorenzo. 2008. "We are also travellers": An action story about disabled women mobilising for an accessible public transport system in Khayelitsha and Nyanga, Cape Metropole, South Africa. South Afr. J. Occup. Ther. 38, 1 (2008), 32--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lauren R. Milne, Cynthia L. Bennett, and Richard E. Ladner. 2013. VBGhost: A Braille-based Educational Smartphone Game for Children. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75:1--75:2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Maghboeba Mosavel, Christian Simon, Debbie van Stade, and Mara Buchbinder. 2005. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: Engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question. Soc. Sci. Med. 61, 12 (December 2005), 2577--2587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development. 2008. Kenya - National Survey for Persons with Disabilities 2008. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from http://www.ilo.org/surveydata/index.php/catalog/927Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. L. Van Niekerk, T. Lorenzo, and P. Mdlokolo. 2006. Understanding partnerships in developing disabled entrepreneurs through participatory action research. Disabil. Rehabil. 28, 5 (January 2006), 323--331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500166425Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Nora Groce and Maria Kett. 2013. The Disability and Development Gap. Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/leonard-cheshire-research/research/publications/documents/working-papers/wp-21.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Pew Research Centre. 2018. Social Media Use Continues to Rise in Developing Countries. Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/06/19/social-media-use-continues-to-rise-in-developing-countries-but-plateaus-across-developed-ones/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Joyojeet Pal, Priyank Chandra, Terence O'Neill, Maura Youngman, Jasmine Jones, Ji Hye Song, William Strayer, and Ludmila Ferrari. 2016. An Accessibility Infrastructure for the Global South. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 24:1--24:11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2909609.2909666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Joyojeet Pal, Manas Pradhan, Mihir Shah, and Rakesh Babu. 2011. Assistive Technology for Vision-impairments: Anagenda for the ICTD Community. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW '11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 513--522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1963192.1963365Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Joyojeet Pal, Anandhi Viswanathan, Priyank Chandra, Anisha Nazareth, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Hariharan Subramonyam, Aditya Johri, Mark S. Ackerman, and Sile O'Modhrain. 2017. Agency in Assistive Technology Adoption: Visual Impairment and Smartphone Use in Bangalore. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5929--5940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025895Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Joyojeet Pal, Anandhi Viswanathan, and Ji-Hye Song. 2016. Smartphone Adoption Drivers and Challenges in Urban Living: Cases from Seoul and Bangalore. In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction (IHCI '16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 24--34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3014362.3014364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Anicia N. Peters, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Kagonya Awori, Nicola J. Bidwell, Edwin Blake, Arun Kumar, and Shilumbe Chivuno-Kuria. 2014. Collaborating with Communities in Africa: A Hitchhikers Guide. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1969--1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. André Rodrigues, Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Tiago Guerreiro. 2015. Getting Smartphones to Talkback: Understanding the Smartphone Adoption Process of Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23--32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Yvonne Rogers, Liam Bannon, and Graham Button. 1994. Rethinking Theoretical Frameworks for HCI: Report on an INTERCHI '93 Workshop, Amsterdam, 24--25th April, 1993. SIGCHI Bull 26, 1 (January 1994), 28--30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/181526.181530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Yvonne Rogers and Gary Marsden. 2013. Does he take sugar?: moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. interactions 20, 4 (2013), 48--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Nithya Sambasivan, Ed Cutrell, Kentaro Toyama, and Bonnie Nardi. 2010. Intermediated Technology Use in Developing Communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2583--2592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Nithya Sambasivan and Thomas Smyth. 2010. The Human Infrastructure of ICTD. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 40:1--40:9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2369220.2369258Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. M. A. C. Schouten and R. W. Mathenge. 2010. Communal sanitation alternatives for slums: A case study of Kibera, Kenya. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts ABC 35, 13--14 (2010), 815--822.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Amartya Sen. 2001. Development as Freedom (New Ed edition ed.). OUP Oxford, Oxford?; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Akbar S. Shaik, G. Hossain, and M. Yeasin. 2010. Design, development and performance evaluation of reconfigured mobile Android phone for people who are blind or visually impaired. ACM, 159--166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1878450.1878478Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Longfei Shangguan, Zheng Yang, Zimu Zhou, Xiaolong Zheng, Chenshu Wu, and Yunhao Liu. 2014. CrossNavi: Enabling Real-time Crossroad Navigation for the Blind with Commodity Phones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 787--798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the Shadow of Misperception: Assistive Technology Use and Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 705--714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans Access Comput 8, 2 (January 2016), 5:1--5:31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Louise Skilling and Colin Rogers. 2017. Crime prevention and coping mechanisms in neighbourhoods: insights from Kibera, Nairobi. Crime Prev. Community Saf. 19, 2 (2017), 103--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Ji-Won Song and Sung-Ho Yang. 2010. Touch Your Way: Haptic Sight for Visually Impaired People to Walk with Independence. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3343--3348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Fiona Ssozi-Mugarura, Thomas Reitmaier, Anja Venter, and Edwin Blake. 2016. Enough with "In-The-Wild." In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction (AfriCHI'16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 182--186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2998581.2998601Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Susan Leigh Star. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. Am. Behav. Sci. 43, 3 (1999), 377--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Sue Stubbs. 1999. Engaging with difference: Soul-searching for a methodology in disability and development research. Disabil. Dev. (1999), 257--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Jeromey B. Temple and Margaret Kelaher. 2018. Is disability exclusion associated with psychological distress? Australian evidence from a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 8, 5 (May 2018), e020829. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020829Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Anja Thieme, Cynthia L. Bennett, Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, and Alex S. Taylor. 2018. "I can do everything but see!" -- How People with Vision Impairments Negotiate their Abilities in Social Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, Paper 203. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173777Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Kentaro Toyama. 2011. Technology As Amplifier in International Development. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (iConference '11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75--82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1940761.1940772Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Kentaro Toyama. 2013. Reflections on HCI for Development. Interactions 20, 6 (November 2013), 64--67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2527298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Ivan Turok and Jackie Borel-Saladin. 2018. The theory and reality of urban slums: Pathways-out-of-poverty or cul-de-sacs? Urban Stud. 55, 4 (2018), 767--789.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Anna Rius Ulldemolins, Van C. Lansingh, Laura Guisasola Valencia, Marissa J. Carter, and Kristen A. Eckert. 2012. Social inequalities in blindness and visual impairment: a review of social determinants. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 60, 5 (October 2012), 368--375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/0301--4738.100529Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Aditya Vashistha, Edward Cutrell, Nicola Dell, and Richard Anderson. 2015. Social Media Platforms for Low-Income Blind People in India. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 259--272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809858Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Elin Wihlborg and Per-Olof Hansson. 2011. Internet café as a supportive educational arena: a case study from the urban slum of Kibera, Nairobi, Kenya. In INTED 2011, International Technology, Education and Development Conference, 7--9 March, Valencia, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. R. Wiles, J. Prosser, A. Bagnoli, A. Clark, K. Davies, S. Holland, and E. Renold. 2008. Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research. (2008). Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/visual-ethics-ethical-issues-in-visual-research(17f0a3ff-c6b9--4c19-a1fd-4adf3e5da8cb)/export.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 3 (April 2011), 1--27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1952383.1952384Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. World Health Organisation. 2017. Improving access to assistive technology: report by the Director-General. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274140Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Susan Wyche. 2015. Exploring Mobile Phone and Social Media Use in a Nairobi Slum: A Case for Alternative Approaches to Design in ICTD. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12:1--12:8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Susan P. Wyche, Andrea Forte, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2013. Hustling Online: Understanding Consolidated Facebook Use in an Informal Settlement in Nairobi. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2823--2832. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Susan Wyche, Nightingale Simiyu, and Martha E. Othieno. 2016. Mobile phones as amplifiers of social inequality among rural Kenyan women. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. TOCHI 23, 3 (2016), 14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Kianoosh Zakerhaghighi, Mojtaba Khanian, and Nima Gheitarani. 2015. Subjective Quality of Life; Assessment of Residents of Informal Settlements in Iran (A Case Study of Hesar Imam Khomeini, Hamedan). Appl. Res. Qual. Life 10, 3 (September 2015), 419--434. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014--9320--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. The Diffusion of IT in the Historical Context of Innovations from Developed Countries | SpringerLink. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-011--9989-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Mobile Report 2019 | Jumia NG. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.jumia.com.ng/mobile-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Trust, assurance, and inequality: A rational choice model of mutual trust 1: The Journal of Mathematical Sociology: Vol 26, No 1--2. Retrieved September 20, 2019 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222500210525Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Social Network: How People with Visual Impairment use Mobile Phones in Kibera, Kenya

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format