skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376340acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Improving Humans' Ability to Interpret Deictic Gestures in Virtual Reality

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative Virtual Environments (CVEs) offer unique opportunities for human communication. Humans can interact with each other over a distance in any environment and visual embodiment they want. Although deictic gestures are especially important as they can guide other humans' attention, humans make systematic errors when using and interpreting them. Recent work suggests that the interpretation of vertical deictic gestures can be significantly improved by warping the pointing arm. In this paper, we extend previous work by showing that models enable to also improve the interpretation of deictic gestures at targets all around the user. Through a study with 28 participants in a CVE, we analyzed the errors users make when interpreting deictic gestures. We derived a model that rotates the arm of a pointing user's avatar to improve the observing users' accuracy. A second study with 24 participants shows that we can improve observers' accuracy by 22.9%. As our approach is not noticeable for users, it improves their accuracy without requiring them to learn a new interaction technique or distracting from the experience.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper213pv.mp4

mp4

6.4 MB

a213-mayer-presentation.mp4

mp4

95 MB

References

  1. Martha W. Alibali. 2005. Gesture in Spatial Cognition: Expressing, Communicating, and Thinking About Spatial Information. Spatial Cognition and Computation 5, 4 (2005), 307--331. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0504_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2016. Haptic Retargeting: Dynamic Repurposing of Passive Haptics for Enhanced Virtual Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1968--1979. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Adrian Bangerter and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2006. Accuracy in detecting referents of pointing gestures unaccompanied by language. Gesture 6, 1 (2006), 85--102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/gest.6.1.05banGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R.M. Baños, C. Botella, M. Alcañiz, V. Liaño, B. Guerrero, and B. Rey. 2004. Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, 6 (dec 2004), 734--741. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.734Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Steve Benford, John Bowers, Lennart E. Fahlén, Chris Greenhalgh, and Dave Snowdon. 1995. User Embodiment in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human 2https://github.com/interactionlab/Deictic-Pointing-in-VR Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 242--249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/223904.223935Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Tom Rodden, and James Pycock. 2001. Collaborative Virtual Environments. Commun. ACM 44, 7 (July 2001), 79--85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/379300.379322Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Johanna Bertram, Johannes Moskaliuk, and Ulrike Cress. 2015. Virtual training: Making reality work? Computers in Human Behavior 43 (2015), 284 -- 292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Frank Biocca. 1992. Communication Within Virtual Reality: Creating a Space for Research. Journal of Communication 42, 4 (1992), 5--22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.1992.tb00810.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Richard A. Bolt. 1980. Put-that-there: Voice and gesture at the graphics interface. In Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH '80). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 262--270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/800250.807503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2016. Point & Teleport Locomotion Technique for Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 205--216. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. George Butterworth and Shoji Itakura. 2000. How the eyes, head and hand serve definite reference. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18, 1 (2000), 25--50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151000165553Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. George Butterworth and Nicholas Jarrett. 1991. What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9, 1 (1991), 55--72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044--835X.1991.tb00862.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Luigia Camaioni. 1997. The Emergence of Intentional Communication in Ontogeny, Phylogeny, and Pathology. European Psychologist 2, 3 (1997), 216--225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016--9040.2.3.216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Luigia Camaioni, Paola Perucchini, Francesca Bellagamba, and Cristina Colonnesi. 2004. The Role of Declarative Pointing in Developing a Theory of Mind. Infancy 5, 3 (2004), 291--308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0503_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Christer Carlsson and Lennart E. Fahlén. 1993. Integrated CSCW Tools Within a Shared 3D Virtual Environment (Abstract). In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '93). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 513--. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/169059.169452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lung-Pan Cheng, Eyal Ofek, Christian Holz, Hrvoje Benko, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2017. Sparse Haptic Proxy: Touch Feedback in Virtual Environments Using a General Passive Prop. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3718--3728. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025753Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Christopher Codella, Reza Jalili, Lawrence Koved, J. Bryan Lewis, Daniel T. Ling, James S. Lipscomb, David A. Rabenhorst, Chu P. Wang, Alan Norton, Paula Sweeney, and Greg Turk. 1992. Interactive Simulation in a Multi-person Virtual World. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 329--334. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/142750.142825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Giambattista Della Porta. 1593. De refractione Optices Parte: Libri Novem... Ex officina Horatii Salviani, apud Jo. Jacobum Carlinum, & Antonium Pacem.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daphne Economou, Ioannis Doumanis, Lemonia Argyriou, and Nektarios Georgalas. 2017. User Experience Evaluation of Human Representation in Collaborative Virtual Environments. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 21, 6 (Dec. 2017), 989--1001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017--1075--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tiare Feuchtner and Jörg Müller. 2017. Extending the Body for Interaction with Reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5145--5157. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. John M. Foley and Richard Held. 1972. Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues. Perception & Psychophysics 12, 3 (01 May 1972), 263--268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Saul Greenberg, Carl Gutwin, and Andy Cockburn. 1996a. Awareness through fisheye views in relaxed-WYSIWIS groupware. In Graphics interface, Vol. 96. Morgan-Kaufmann, Toronto, Canada, 28--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Saul Greenberg, Carl Gutwin, and Mark Roseman. 1996b. Semantic telepointers for groupware. In Proceedings Sixth Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 54--61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/OZCHI.1996.559988Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Scott W Greenwald, Wiley Corning, and Pattie Maes. 2017a. Multi-user framework for collaboration and co-creation in virtual reality (CSCL '17). 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/108440Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott W Greenwald, Alexander Kulik, André Kunert, Stephan Beck, Bernd Fröhlich, Sue Cobb, Sarah Parsons, Nigel Newbutt, Christine Gouveia, Claire Cook, and others. 2017b. Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality. Philadelphia, PA. https://repository.isls.org/handle/1/210Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Victoria Groom, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Clifford Nass. 2009. The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Social Influence 4, 3 (2009), 231--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. ShareVR: Enabling Co-Located Experiences for Virtual Reality Between HMD and Non-HMD Users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 4021--4033. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025683Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Carl Gutwin and Saul Greenberg. 2002. A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11, 3 (01 Sep 2002), 411--446. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021271517844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Anthony Guye-Vuillème, Tolga K. Capin, Igor Sunday Pandzic, Nadia Magnenat Thalmann, and Daniel Thalmann. 1999. Nonverbal communication interface for collaborative virtual environments. Virtual Reality 4, 1 (01 Mar 1999), 49--59. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01434994Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Olof Hagsand. 1996. Interactive multiuser VEs in the DIVE system. IEEE MultiMedia 3, 1 (Spring 1996), 30--39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/93.486702Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Edward Twitchell Hall. 1966. The hidden dimension. Doubleday & Co, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandra G. Hart. 2006. NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society annual meeting, Vol. 50. SAGE Publications, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 904--908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. John B. Haviland. 2003. How to point in Zinacantán. Psychology Press, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, 139--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver Herbort and Wilfried Kunde. 2016. Spatial (mis-)interpretation of pointing gestures to distal referents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42, 1 (2016), 78--89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000126Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Oliver Herbort and Wilfried Kunde. 2018. How to point and to interpret pointing gestures? Instructions can reduce pointer--observer misunderstandings. Psychological Research 82, 2 (01 Mar 2018), 395--406. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0824--8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jason Jerald. 2016. The VR Book: Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality. Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shunichi Kasahara, Keina Konno, Richi Owaki, Tsubasa Nishi, Akiko Takeshita, Takayuki Ito, Shoko Kasuga, and Junichi Ushiba. 2017. Malleable Embodiment: Changing Sense of Embodiment by Spatial-Temporal Deformation of Virtual Human Body. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 6438--6448. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025962Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sotaro Kita. 2003. Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Pascal Knierim, Valentin Schwind, Anna Feit, Florian Nieuwenhuizen, and Niels Henze. 2018. Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality: Analysis of Typing Performance and Effects of Avatar Hands. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173919Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Mikko Kytö, Barrett Ens, Thammathip Piumsomboon, Gun A. Lee, and Mark Billinghurst. 2018. Pinpointing: Precise Head- and Eye-Based Target Selection for Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 81, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sarah Lopez, Yi Yang, Kevin Beltran, Soo Jung Kim, Jennifer Cruz Hernandez, Chelsy Simran, Bingkun Yang, and Beste F. Yuksel. 2019. Investigating Implicit Gender Bias and Embodiment of White Males in Virtual Reality with Full Body Visuomotor Synchrony. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 557, 12 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300787Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Kristina Lundholm Fors. 2015. Production and Perception of Pauses in Speech. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Gothenburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Sven Mayer, Valentin Schwind, Robin Schweigert, and Niels Henze. 2018. The Effect of Offset Correction and Cursor on Mid-Air Pointing in Real and Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 653, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174227Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Sven Mayer, Katrin Wolf, Stefan Schneegass, and Niels Henze. 2015. Modeling Distant Pointing for Compensating Systematic Displacements. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 4165--4168. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Thammathip Piumsomboon, Gun A. Lee, Jonathon D. Hart, Barrett Ens, Robert W. Lindeman, Bruce H. Thomas, and Mark Billinghurst. 2018. Mini-Me: An Adaptive Avatar for Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 46, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173620Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Thammathip Piumsomboon, Youngho Lee, Gun Lee, and Mark Billinghurst. 2017. CoVAR: A Collaborative Virtual and Augmented Reality System for Remote Collaboration. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Emerging Technologies (SA '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 3, 2 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3132818.3132822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Katrin Plaumann, Matthias Weing, Christian Winkler, Michael Müller, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. Towards accurate cursorless pointing: the effects of ocular dominance and handedness. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (07 Dec 2017). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017--1100--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Holger T. Regenbrecht, Thomas W. Schubert, and Frank Friedmann. 1998. Measuring the Sense of Presence and its Relations to Fear of Heights in Virtual Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 10, 3 (1998), 233--249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Rufat Rzayev, Gürkan Karaman, Katrin Wolf, Niels Henze, and Valentin Schwind. 2019. The Effect of Presence and Appearance of Guides in Virtual Reality Exhibitions. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019 (MuC'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 11--20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Maria V. Sanchez-Vives and Mel Slater. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 6, 4 (apr 2005), 332--339. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1651Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Chris L. Schmidt. 1999. Adult understanding of spontaneous attention-directing events: What does gesture contribute? Ecological Psychology 11, 2 (1999), 139--174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1102_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Valentin Schwind, Pascal Knierim, Lews Chuang, and Niels Henze. 2017a. "Where's Pinky?": The Effects of a Reduced Number of Fingers in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY'17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116596Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Valentin Schwind, Pascal Knierim, Cagri Tasci, Patrick Franczak, Nico Haas, and Niels Henze. 2017b. "These Are Not My Hands!": Effect of Gender on the Perception of Avatar Hands in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1577--1582. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Valentin Schwind, Jan Leusmann, and Niels Henze. 2019. Understanding Visual-Haptic Integration of Avatar Hands Using a Fitts' Law Task in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019 (MuC'19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 211--222. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Valentin Schwind, Lorraine Lin, Massimiliano Di Luca, Sophie Jörg, and James Hillis. 2018a. Touch with Foreign Hands: The Effect of Virtual Hand Appearance on Visual-haptic Integration. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (SAP '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 9, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3225153.3225158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Valentin Schwind, Sven Mayer, Alexandre Comeau-Vermeersch, Robin Schweigert, and Niels Henze. 2018b. Up to the Finger Tip: The Effect of Avatars on Mid-Air Pointing Accuracy in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242675Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Maurício Sousa, Rafael Kufner dos Anjos, Daniel Mendes, Mark Billinghurst, and Joaquim Jorge. 2019. Warping Deixis: Distorting Gestures to Enhance Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 608, 12 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300838Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Mark Jeffrey Stefik, Daniel G. Bobrow, Gregg Foster, Stan Lanning, and Deborah Tatar. 1987. WYSIWIS Revised: Early Experiences with Multiuser Interfaces. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 5, 2 (April 1987), 147--167. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/27636.28056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Jonathan Steuer. 1992. Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication 42, 4 (1992), 73--93. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460--2466.1992.tb00812.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Haruo Takemura and Fumio Kishino. 1992. Cooperative Work Environment Using Virtual Workspace. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '92). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 226--232. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/143457.269747Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Janet L. Taylor and D. I. McCloskey. 1988. Pointing. Behavioural Brain Research 29, 1 (1988), 1 -- 5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0166--4328(88)90046-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Jolanda G. Tromp, Anthony Steed, and John R. Wilson. 2003. Systematic Usability Evaluation and Design Issues for Collaborative Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, 3 (2003), 241--267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474603765879512Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Martin Usoh, Kevin Arthur, Mary C Whitton, Rui Bastos, Anthony Steed, Mel Slater, and Frederick P Brooks Jr. 1999. Walking> walking-in-place> flying, in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 359--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Juan Pablo Wachs, Mathias Kölsch, Helman Stern, and Yael Edan. 2011. Vision-based Hand-gesture Applications. Commun. ACM 54, 2 (Feb. 2011), 60--71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1897816.1897838Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. E. J. Williams. 1949. Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments. Australian Journal of Chemistry 2, 2 (01 Jun 1949), 149--168. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9490149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Bob G Witmer and Michael J Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3 (jun 1998), 225--240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Nelson Wong and Carl Gutwin. 2014. Support for Deictic Pointing in CVEs: Still Fragmented After All These Years'. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1377--1387. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving Humans' Ability to Interpret Deictic Gestures in Virtual Reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        10688 pages
        ISBN:9781450367080
        DOI:10.1145/3313831

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format