skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Chase Lights in the Peripheral View: How the Design of Moving Patterns on an LED Strip Influences the Perception of Speed in an Automotive Context

Published:23 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

LEDs on a strip, when turned on and off in a specific order, result in the perception of apparent motion (i.e. beta movement). In the automotive domain such chase lights have been used to alter drivers' perception of driving speed by manipulating the pixel speed of LEDs. We argue that the perceived velocity of beta movement in the peripheral view is not only based on the actual pixel speed but can be influenced by other factors such as frequency, width and brightness of lit LED segments. We conducted a velocity matching experiment (N=25) by systematically varying these three properties, in order to determine their influence on a participant's perceived velocity in a vehicle mock-up. Results show that a higher frequency and stronger brightness increased perceived velocity, whereas segment width had no influence. We discuss how findings may be applied when designing systems that use beta movement to influence the perception of ambient light velocity.

References

  1. Louis Aarons. 1964. Visual apparent movement research: review, 1935--1955, and bibliography, 1955--1963. Perceptual and motor skills 18, 1 (1964), 239--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Robert Ball and Chris North. 2008. The Effects of Peripheral Vision and Physical Navigation on Large Scale Visualization. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2008 (GI '08). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 9--16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1375714.1375717Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Douglas Bates, Martin Maechler, and Ben Bolker. 2012. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeremy Birnholtz, Lindsay Reynolds, Eli Luxenberg, Carl Gutwin, and Maryam Mustafa. 2010. Awareness Beyond the Desktop: Exploring Attention and Distraction with a Projected Peripheral-vision Display. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (GI '10). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, 55--62. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1839214.1839225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mark R Blakemore and Robert Jefferson Snowden. 1999. The effect of contrast upon perceived speed: a general phenomenon? Perception 28, 1 (1999), 33--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chris Harrison, John Horstman, Gary Hsieh, and Scott Hudson. 2012. Unlocking the Expressivity of Point Lights. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1683--1692. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chris Harrison, Zhiquan Yeo, and Scott E. Hudson. 2010. Faster Progress Bars: Manipulating Perceived Duration with Visual Augmentations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1545--1548. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Doris Hausen, Christine Wagner, Sebastian Boring, and Andreas Butz. 2013. Comparing Modalities and Feedback for Peripheral Interaction. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1263--1268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468582Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michael J Hawken, Karl R Gegenfurtner, and Chao Tang. 1994. Contrast dependence of colour and luminance motion mechanisms in human vision. Nature 367, 6460 (1994), 268--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eugene Hecht. 2002. Optics, 4th. International edition, Addison-Wesley, San Francisco (2002), 467--473.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Valentin Heun, Anette von Kapri, and Pattie Maes. 2012. Perifoveal Display: Combining Foveal and Peripheral Vision in One Visualization. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1150--1155. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370460Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Brett R. Jones, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2013. IllumiRoom: Peripheral Projected Illusions for Interactive Experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 869--878. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466112Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2015. Supporting Lane Change Decisions with Ambient Light. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 204--211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799259Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Andreas Löcken, Heiko Müller, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne CJ Boll. 2014. Exploring the Design Space of Ambient Light Displays. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 387--390. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2574793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michael P. Manser and Peter A. Hancock. 2007. The influence of perceptual speed regulation on speed perception, choice, and control: Tunnel wall characteristics and influences. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39 (1) (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Andrii Matviienko, Andreas Löcken, Abdallah El Ali, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. NaviLight: Investigating Ambient Light Displays for Turn-by-turn Navigation in Cars. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 283--294. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Christine Döttlinger, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. ChaseLight: ambient LED stripes to control driving speed. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 212--219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Heiko Müller, Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. Sparkle: An Ambient Light Display for Dynamic Off-screen Points of Interest. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 51--60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Takuya Nojima, Yoshihiko Saiga, Yu Okano, Yuki Hashimoto, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2007. The Peripheral Display for Augmented Reality of Self-motion. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT '07). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 308--309. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICAT.2007.54Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Florian Perteneder, Eva-Maria Beatrix Grossauer, Joanne Leong, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Michael Haller. 2016. Glowworms and Fireflies: Ambient Light on Large Interactive Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5849--5861. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858524Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paolo Pretto, Jean-Pierre Bresciani, Gregor Rainer, and Heinrich H Bülthoff. 2012. Foggy perception slows us down. Elife 1 (2012), e00031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Paolo Pretto and Astros Chatziastros. 2006. Changes in optic flow and scene contrast affect the driving speed. In Driving Simulation Conference Europe (DSC Europe 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R Core Team. 2015. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (2015). https://www.R-project.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Robert M Steinman, Zygmunt Pizlo, and Filip J Pizlo. 2000. Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer's discovery launched the Gestalt revolution. Vision Research 40, 17 (2000), 2257--2264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Leland S Stone and Peter Thompson. 1992. Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision research 32, 8 (1992), 1535--1549.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Deqing Sun, Stefan Roth, and Michael J Black. 2010. Secrets of optical flow estimation and their principles. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2432--2439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Peter Thompson. 1981. Velocity after-effects: the effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli. Vision research 21, 3 (1981), 337--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peter Thompson. 1982. Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast. Vision research 22, 3 (1982), 377--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Paul D Tynan and Robert Sekuler. 1982. Motion processing in peripheral vision: Reaction time and perceived velocity. Vision Research 22, 1 (1982), 61--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen, Jacques Terken, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Berry Eggen, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. Ambient Light and Its Influence on Driving Experience. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 293--301. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3122992Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yair Weiss, Eero P Simoncelli, and Edward H Adelson. 2002. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature neuroscience 5, 6 (2002), 598--604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Max Wertheimer. 1912. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 61 (1912), 161--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. John Michael Williams and Alfred Lit. 1983. Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision research 23, 2 (1983), 171--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Samuel J Williamson and Herman Z Cummins. 1983. Light and color in nature and art. Light and Color in Nature and Art, by Samuel J. Williamson, Herman Z. Cummins, pp. 512. ISBN 0--471-08374--7. Wiley-VCH, February 1983. 1 (1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Graham Wilson, Thomas Carter, Sriram Subramanian, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2014. Perception of Ultrasonic Haptic Feedback on the Hand: Localisation and Apparent Motion. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1133--1142. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Bodo Winter. 2013. A very basic tutorial for performing linear mixed effects analyses. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Robert Xiao and Hrvoje Benko. 2016. Augmenting the Field-of-View of Head-Mounted Displays with Sparse Peripheral Displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1221--1232. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858212Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Chase Lights in the Peripheral View: How the Design of Moving Patterns on an LED Strip Influences the Perception of Speed in an Automotive Context

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format