Stacy Black
Hoda Mehrpouyan
Jerry Alan Fails
ABSTRACT
Internet usage continues to increase among children ages 12 and younger. Because their digital interactions can be persistently stored, there is a need for building an understanding and foundational knowledge of privacy. We describe initial investigations into children's understanding of privacy from a Contextual Integrity (CI) perspective by conducting semi-structured interviews. We share results -- that echo what others have shown -- that indicate children have limited knowledge and understanding of CI principles. We also share an initial exploration of utilizing participatory design theater as a possible educational mechanism to help children develop a stronger understanding of important privacy principles.
- Adam Barth, Anupam Datta, John C Mitchell, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2006. Privacy and contextual integrity: Framework and applications. (2006), 15--pp.Google Scholar
- Kathy Charmaz and Linda L. Belgrave. 2012. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (Jan. 2012), 347--366.Google Scholar
- John W. Creswell. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications. Google-Books-ID: bjO2AAAAIAAJ.Google Scholar
- Priya Kumar, Shalmali Milind Naik, Utkarsha Ramesh Devkar, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L. Clegg, and Jessica Vitak. 2017. 'No Telling Passcodes Out Because They're Private': Understanding Children's Mental Models of Privacy and Security Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, Jonathan Yang, Brenna McNally, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2018. Co-designing online privacy-related games and stories with children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 67--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janet C Read and Russell Beale. 2009. Under my pillow: designing security for children's special things. (2009), 5.Google Scholar
- Leah Zhang-Kennedy, Yomna Abdelaziz, and Sonia Chiasson. 2017. Cyberheroes: The design and evaluation of an interactive ebook to educate children about online privacy. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 13 (2017), 10--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jun Zhao, Ge Wang, Carys Dally, Petr Slovak, Julian Childs, Max Van Klee, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. I make up a silly name': Understanding Children's Perception of Privacy Risks Online. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10245 (2019). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Anon what what?: Children's Understanding of the Language of Privacy
Recommendations
Toward a Practice-Based Approach to Privacy Literacy
Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global FutureAbstractChildren play, communicate, create, learn, and socialize with networked digital technologies. These activities generate data about what children do, where they go, and with whom they interact, raising questions about children’s privacy. To help ...
Children with ADHD and their Care Ecosystem: Designing Beyond Symptoms
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDesigning for children with ADHD has been of increasing interest to the HCI community. However, current approaches do not adequately involve all relevant stakeholders, and primarily focus on addressing symptoms, following a medical model of disability ...
YoungDeafDesign: Participatory design with young Deaf children
AbstractIt is common in HCI research to involve children in the design of their own technology. However, no design methods exist to design with young Deaf children. To address this gap, I have created YoungDeafDesign, a design method for ...
Comments