skip to main content
10.1145/3289402.3289513acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessitaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantic recommendation system of digital educational resources

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In today's world, information seekers are confronted with a large volume of very heterogeneous and varied data combined with the multilingual, which makes it difficult to find the most relevant digital educational resource that meets the user's needs. These needs are expressed by a query, generally based on keywords. This observation prompted the researchers to exploit other techniques and methods, among which there is the semantic web. In this paper, we propose a bayesian networks-based recommendation system which represents a recommendation activity. Our goal is to propose an approach to the semantic recommendation of digital resources after each query submitted by the user, by means of SPARQL queries that searches in the Linking Open Data (LOD) cloud.

References

  1. Hendrik Drachsler, Katrien Verbert, Olga C Santos, and Nikos Manouselis. Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 421--451. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gilbert Paquette and Alexis Miara. Managing open educational resources on the web of data. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(8), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Constanta-Nicoleta Bodea, Maria-Iuliana Dascalu, and Adina Lipai. Clustering of the web search results in educational recommender systems. In Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, pages 154--181. IGI Global, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Alicia Díaz, Regina Motz, Edelweis Rohrer, and Libertad Tansini. An ontology network for educational recommender systems. In Educational Recommender Systems and Technologies: Practices and Challenges, pages 67--93. IGI Global, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tania Kerkiri, Athanassios Manitsaris, and Ioannis Mavridis. How e-learning systems may benefit from ontologies and recommendation methods to efficiently personalise resources. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 5(3-4): 347--370, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Yuanyuan Wang and Kazutoshi Sumiya. Semantic ranking of lecture slides based on conceptual relationship and presentational structure. Procedia Computer Science, 1(2):2801--2810, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Abele Andrejs, John P. McCrae, Paul Buitelaar, Anja Jentzsch, and Richard Cyganiak. Linking open data cloud diagram 2017, 2017. URL http://lod-cloud.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamid Slimani, Nour-eddine El Faddouli, Mohamed Idrissi Khalidi, and Samir Bennani. Sharing the digital pedagogical resources among institutions of higher education in morocco. In Information Science and Technology (CIST), 2014 Third IEEE International Colloquium in, pages 266--271. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hamid Slimani, Nou-eddine El Faddouli, Rachid Benslimane, and Samir Bennani. Personalized search and recommendation in a digital educational resources repository: the case of ori-oai. In Information Science and Technology (CiSt), 2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on, pages 541--546. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific american, 284(5):34--43, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. PHAN Quang Trung Tien. Ontologies et web services. Travail d'intérêt personnel encadré, Institut de la Francophonie pour l'Informatique, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John Domingue, Dieter Fensel, and James A. Hendler. Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1st edition, 2011. ISBN 978-3-540-92912-3. (book). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dean Allemang and Jim Hendler. Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist -- Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Amsterdam, 2nd edition, 2011. ISBN 978-0-12-385965-5. (book). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Abdelladim Hadaoui, Samir Bennani, and Mohammed khalidi Idrissi. An ontological extraction framework of the actors' pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 93(1):69--80, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Patrice Buche. Les langages du Web Sémantique, 2007. Cours, Département Mathématique et Informatique Appliquées INRA, unité Mét@risk UFR Informatique d'AgroParisTech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamid Slimani, Nour-eddine El Faddouli, Rachid Benslimane, and Samir Bennani. The normalization of the indexation of digital educational resources for higher education among the arab countries: the case of moroccan application profile. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science (IJITCS)(http://www. ijitcs. com)(ISSN: 2091-1610) on volume, (22), 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilles Gauthier. Semantic web and metadata - international norm iso / iec 19788 metadata for learning resources (mlr), November 2th 2012. URL https://www.milieuxdoc.ca/cm2s_content/_milieux-documentaire/document/milieux-documentaires-1355504552-Atelier-31-Web-s-mantique-et-m-tadonn-es.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Iso-mlr iso-iec 19788 information technoogy -- learning, education and training -- metatda for learning resources multipart standard, 28-Nov-2014. URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_19788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Iso-mlr iso-iec 19788 information technoogy -- learning, education and training -- metatda for learning resources multipart standard, 15-01-2011. 55p.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. The world wide web consortium (w3c). URL http://www.w3.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Saadia Lgarch, Mohamed Idrissi Khalidi, and Samir Bennani. A selection algorithm of terms from owl ontology for semantically classify messages. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(11):6788--6800, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stefan Dietze, Hendrik Drachsler, and Daniela Giordano. A survey on linked data and the social web as facilitators for tel recommender systems. In Recommender systems for technology enhanced learning, pages 47--75. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tom Heath and Christian Bizer. Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 1(1):1--136, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Andrejs Abele, John P. McCrae, Paul Buitelaar, Anja Jentzsch, and Richard Cyganiak. Linking open data cloud diagram 2017, 2017. URL http://lod-cloud.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. State of the lod cloud 2014, 2014. URL http://linkeddatacatalog.dws.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/state/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamid Slimani, Nour-eddine El Faddouli, Samir Bennani, and Naila Amrous. Models of digital educational resources indexing and dynamic user profile evolution. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(01): 26--32, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Uri Hanani, Bracha Shapira, and Peretz Shoval. Information filtering: Overview of issues, research and systems. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 11 (3):203--259, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nikos Manouselis and Constantina Costopoulou. Experimental analysis of design choices in multiattribute utility collaborative filtering. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 21(02):311--331, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Nikos Manouselis, Hendrik Drachsler, Katrien Verbert, and Erik Duval. Recommender systems for learning. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Judea Pearl. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Elsevier, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard Turtle and W Bruce Croft. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 9(3):187--222, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information processing & management, 24(5):513--523, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic recommendation system of digital educational resources

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SITA'18: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications
      October 2018
      301 pages
      ISBN:9781450364621
      DOI:10.1145/3289402

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader