skip to main content
10.1145/3287098.3287126acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Urdu language based information dissemination system for low-literate farmers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 January 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the design process by which we designed an Android application equipped with audio, textual menus and visuals components for use by farmers of diverse literacy levels looking for vital weather information after the conclusion of research-work that productivity lags due to information inadequacies. The intervention provides more timely access to accurate information to low-literate farmers and thereby help in making the agricultural ecosystem more robust. We discuss the various design and implementation features of our system and presents our findings from the field on the usability of our application. We have also openly released our source code so that other users and developers can also benefit from our work.

References

  1. Jenny C Aker. 2011. Dial "A" for agriculture: a review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Economics 42, 6 (2011), 631--647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Syed Ali, Harris Durrani, Muhammad Naeem, Waleed Riaz, and Suleman Shahid. 2016. Supporting Pakistani Farmers Through Digital Means: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2299--2305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Yaw Anokwa, Thomas N Smyth, Divya Ramachandran, Jahanzeb Sherwani, Yael Schwartzman, Rowena Luk, Melissa Ho, Neema Moraveji, and Brian DeRenzi. 2009. Stories from the field: Reflections on HCI4D experiences. Information Technologies & International Development 5, 4 (2009), pp--101. http://www.itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/427Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Adriana Camacho and Emily Conover. 2010. The impact of receiving price and climate information in the agricultural sector. SSRN (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sebastien Cuendet, Indrani Medhi, Kalika Bali, and Edward Cutrell. 2013. VideoKheti: Making video content accessible to low-literate and novice users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2833--2842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Melissa Densmore, Ben Bellows, John Chuang, and Eric Brewer. 2013. The evolving braid: how an organization in Uganda achieved reliable communications. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers-Volume 1. ACM, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rikin Gandhi, Rajesh Veeraraghavan, Kentaro Toyama, and Vanaja Ramprasad. 2007. Digital green: Participatory video for agricultural extension. In International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 2007. ICTD 2007. IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fahid Idrees. 2018. Publicly accessible open source code of our agricultural Android-based mobile application. https://github.com/fahadgudu/weather-app-web-portal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fahad Idrees, Amna Batool, and Junaid Qadir. 2017. Weather Forecast Information Dissemination Design For Low-Literate Farmers: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Indrani Medhi, Somani Patnaik, Emma Brunskill, SN Gautama, William Thies, and Kentaro Toyama. 2011. Designing mobile interfaces for novice and low-literacy users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18, 1 (2011), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Indrani Medhi-Thies, Pedro Ferreira, Nakull Gupta, Jacki O'Neill, and Edward Cutrell. 2015. KrishiPustak: A Social Networking System for Low-Literate Farmers. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Surabhi Mittal. 2015. Mobile phones based agro-advisories role in gender empowerment. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Maletsabisa Molapo and Melissa Densmore. 2015. How to choose a mobile phone for an ICT4D project. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Omar Mubin, Joshua Tubb, Mauricio Novoa, Mustafa Naseem, and Samia Razaq. 2015. Understanding the Needs of Pakistani Farmers and the Prospects of an ICT Intervention. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1109--1114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Neil Patel, Deepti Chittamuru, Anupam Jain, Paresh Dave, and Tapan S Parikh. 2010. Avaaj Otalo: a field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 733--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. UNESCO report. 2017. International Literacy Day 2017. http://uis.unesco.org/en/news/international-literacy-day-2017. {Online; accessed July 2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. DAWN Newspaper's Staff Reporter. 2016. Smartphones for farmers. https://www.dawn.com/news/1281296. {Online; accessed July 2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Waleed Riaz, Haris Durrani, Suleman Shahid, and Agha Ali Raza. 2017. ICT Intervention for Agriculture Development: Designing an IVR System for Farmers in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 33, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Galen Weld, Trevor Perrier, Jenny Aker, Joshua E Blumenstock, Brian Dillon, Adalbertus Kamanzi, Editha Kokushubira, Jennifer Webster, and Richard J Anderson. 2018. eKichabi: Information Access through Basic Mobile Phones in Rural Tanzania. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Susan P Wyche, Melissa Densmore, and Brian Samuel Geyer. 2015. Real mobiles: Kenyan and Zambian smallholder farmers' current attitudes towards mobile phones. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Urdu language based information dissemination system for low-literate farmers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICTD '19: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
        January 2019
        422 pages
        ISBN:9781450361224
        DOI:10.1145/3287098

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 January 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate22of116submissions,19%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader