skip to main content
10.1145/3284179.3284195acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Newton's cradle: a smartphone-based video analysis approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss a simple and inexpensive method to study pendular movement and head-on elastic collisions, according to the Bring-Your-Own-Device philosophy. A popular toy, the Newton's cradle, can be used to provide a pendular or a collision system, and the movements of the spheres can be tracked by video analysis, using a smartphone. We show that the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy, upon collision of two or more spheres, can be easily confirmed and that the pendular movement can be studied in detail. A more complete analysis, appropriate for undergraduate students in STEM degrees, is also suggested.

References

  1. F. Herrmann and P. Schmälzle. 1981. Simple explanation of a well-known collision experiment. American Journal of Physics 49, 8, 761--764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. F. Herrmann and M. Seitz. 1982. How does the ball-chain work? American Journal of Physics 50, 11, 977--981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. R. Lovett, K. M. Moulding, and S. Anketell-Jones. 1988. Collisions between elastic bodies: Newton's cradle. European Journal of Physics 9, 4, 323--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. J. Hinch and S. Saint-Jean. 1999. The fragmentation of a line of balls by an impact. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 455, 1989, 3201--3220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. V. Ceanga and Y. Hurmuzlu. 2001. A New Look at an Old Problem: Newton's Cradle. Journal of Applied Mechanics 68, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stefan Hutzler, Gary Delaney, Denis Weaire, and Finn Macleod. 2004. Rocking Newton's cradle. American Journal of Physics 72, 12, 1508--1516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. M. Donahue, C. M. Hrenya, A. P. Zelinskaya, and K. J. Nakagawa. 2008. Newton's cradle undone: Experiments and collision models for the normal collision of three solid spheres. Physics of Fluids 20, 11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Colin F. Gauld. 2006. Newton's Cradle in Physics Education. Science & Education 15, 6, 597--617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Murat Muradoglu, Enoch Ming Wei Ng, and Tuck Wah Ng. 2014. Experimentation on recurrent sphere collision with Audacity. European Journal of Physics 35, 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Douglas Brown and Anne J. Cox. 2009. Innovative Uses of Video Analysis. The Physics Teacher 47, 3, 145--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Colin White. 2017. A comparative study of two types of ball-on-ball collision. Physics Education 52, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rod Cross. 2018. Multiple collisions of two steel balls in a Newton's cradle. European Journal of Physics 39, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Anissofira, F. D. E. Latief, L. Kholida, and P. Sinaga. 2017. Newton's Cradle Experiment Using Video Tracking Analysis with Multiple Representation Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 895.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Joel Chevrier, Laya Madani, Simon Ledenmat, and Ahmad Bsiesy. 2013. Teaching classical mechanics using smartphones. The Physics Teacher 51, 6, 376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jonathan Hall. 2013. More smartphone acceleration. The Physics Teacher 51, 1, 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Martín Monteiro, Cecilia Stari, Cecilia Cabeza, and Arturo C. Marti. 2015. The Atwood machine revisited using smartphones. The Physics Teacher 53, 6, 373--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Asif Shakur and Jakob Kraft. 2016. Measurement of Coriolis Acceleration with a Smartphone. The Physics Teacher 54, 5, 288--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Patrik Vogt and Jochen Kuhn. 2012. Analyzing simple pendulum phenomena with a smartphone acceleration sensor. The Physics Teacher 50, 7, 439.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Patrik Vogt, Jochen Kuhn, and Sebastian Müller. 2011. Experiments Using Cell Phones in Physics Classroom Education: The Computer-Aided g Determination. The Physics Teacher 49, 6, 383--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sebastian Gröber, Pascal Klein, and Jochen Kuhn. 2014. Video-based problems in introductory mechanics physics courses. European Journal of Physics 35, 5, 055019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Pascal Klein, Jochen Kuhn, Andreas Müller, and Sebastian Gröber. 2015. Video Analysis Exercises in Regular Introductory Physics Courses: Effects of Conventional Methods and Possibilities of Mobile Devices. In Multidisciplinary Research on Teaching and Learning, W. Schnotz, A. Kauertz, H. Ludwig, A. Müller and J. Pretsch Eds. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 270--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Vanda Pereira, Pablo Martín-Ramos, Pedro Pereira Da Silva, and Manuela Ramos Silva. 2017. Studying 3D collisions with smartphones. The Physics Teacher 55, 5, 312--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mário S. M. N. F. Gomes, Pablo Martín-Ramos, Pedro S. Pereira Da Silva, and Manuela Ramos Silva. 2018. The 'spinning disk touches stationary disk' problem revisited: an experimental approach. European Journal of Physics 39, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Helen Crompton and John Traxler. 2018. Mobile learning and higher education: challenges in context. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsaedek. 2018. VidAnalysis free v. 1.63, Google Play.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Hohenwarter, M. Borcherds, G. Ancsin, B. Bencze, M. Blossier, A. Delobelle, C. Denizet, J. Elias, A. Fekete, L. Gal, Z. Konevny, Z. Kovacs, S. Lizelfelner, B. Parisse, and G. Sturr. 2013. GeoGebra 4.4, http://www.geogebra.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark Harman. 2018. Open Camera v. 1.43.3, Google Play.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Vernier. 2018. Vernier Video Physics v.3.0.5, App Store.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Newton's cradle: a smartphone-based video analysis approach

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
            October 2018
            1072 pages
            ISBN:9781450365185
            DOI:10.1145/3284179

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 24 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            TEEM'18 Paper Acceptance Rate151of243submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader