skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Reciprocity and Donation: How Article Topic, Quality and Dwell Time Predict Banner Donation on Wikipedia

Published:01 November 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Donation-based support for open, peer production projects such as Wikipedia is an important mechanism for preserving their integrity and independence. For this reason understanding donation behavior and incentives is crucial in this context. In this work, using a dataset of aggregated donation information from Wikimedia's 2015 fund-raising campaign, representing nearly 1 million pages from English and French language versions of Wikipedia, we explore the relationship between the properties of contents of a page and the number of donations on this page. Our results suggest the existence of a reciprocity mechanism, meaning that articles that provide more utility value attract a higher rate of donation. We discuss these and other findings focusing on the impact they may have on the design of banner-based fundraising campaigns. Our findings shed more light on the mechanisms that lead people to donate to Wikipedia and the relation between properties of contents and donations.

References

  1. James Andreoni. 1989. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Polit. Econ. 97, 6 (1989), 1447--1458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. James Andreoni. 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100, 401 (1990), 464--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dan Ariely, Anat Bracha, and Stephan Meier. 2009. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 1 (2009), 544--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Omar Azfar. 2001. The logic of collective action. In The Elgar companion to public choice. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Arun Balagopalan. 2012. Improving topic reproducibility in topic models. University of California, Irvine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Daniel Batson. 2012. 12 A history of prosocial behavior research. Handb. Hist. Soc. Psychol. (2012), 243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. David A. Belsley. 1991. Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gee-Woo Bock, Robert W. Zmud, Young-Gul Kim, and Jae-Nam Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q. (2005), 87--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Robert B. Cialdini. 2009. Influence: Science and practice. Pearson education Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia and Dario Taraborelli. 2015. MoodBar: Increasing new user retention in Wikipedia through lightweight socialization. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 734--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Quang-Vinh Dang and Claudia-Lavinia Ignat. 2017. An end-to-end learning solution for assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Scott Dawson. 1988. Four motivations for charitable giving: Implications for ma. Mark. Health Serv. 8, 2 (1988), 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabon Dzogang, Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, and Nello Cristianini. 2016. Seasonal Fluctuations in Collective Mood Revealed by Wikipedia Searches and Twitter Posts. In ICDM Workshops, 931--937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Armin Falk. 2004. Charitable Giving as a Gift Exchange-Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter. 2000. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 3 (2000), 159--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Niall Firth. 2012. Crowdfunding successes show value of small donations. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruediger Glott, Philipp Schmidt, and Rishab Ghosh. 2010. Wikipedia survey--overview of results. U. N. Univ. Collab. Creat. Group (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Alvin W. Gouldner. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. (1960), 161--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Aaron Halfaker. 2017. Interpolating Quality Dynamics in Wikipedia and Demonstrating the Keilana Effect. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym '17), 19:1--19:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T. Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 5 (2013), 664--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. William T. Harbaugh. 1998. What do donations buy?: A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. J. Public Econ. 67, 2 (1998), 269--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Daniel Hasan Dalip, Marcos André Gonçalves, Marco Cristo, and Pável Calado. 2009. Automatic quality assessment of content created collaboratively by web communities: a case study of wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin A. McCabe, and Vernon L. Smith. 1996. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. Int. J. Game Theory 25, 3 (1996), 289--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gary Hsieh, Jilin Chen, Jalal Mahmud, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2014. You read what you value. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gary Hsieh and Rafal Kocielnik. 2016. You get who you pay for: The impact of incentives on participation bias. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 823--835. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Chris S. Hulleman, Olga Godes, Bryan L. Hendricks, and Judith M. Harackiewicz. 2010. Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. J. Educ. Psychol. 102, 4 (2010), 880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Tamieka Jameson. 2017. Communication strategies as drivers of nonprofit donor retention. Walden University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. John H. Kagel and Alvin E. Roth. 2016. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2: The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Beth Kanter and Aliza Sherman. 2016. The happy, healthy nonprofit: Strategies for impact without burnout. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Aniket Kittur, Ed H. Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2009. What's in Wikipedia?: mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1509--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. George P. Knight, Lora G. Johnson, Gustavo Carlo, and Nancy Eisenberg. 1994. A multiplicative model of the dispositional antecedents of a prosocial behavior: Predicting more of the people more of the time. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66, 1 (1994), 178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rafal Kocielnik and Gary Hsieh. 2017. Send Me a Different Message: Utilizing Cognitive Space to Create Engaging Message Triggers. In CSCW, 2193--2207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tomás Kramár and Mária Bieliková. 2014. Context of seasonality in web search. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, 644--649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Nicola Lacetera and Mario Macis. 2010. Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 76, 2 (2010), 225--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. David Leonhardt. 2008. What makes people give. N. Y. Times 9, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonathan Meer. 2011. Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation. J. Public Econ. 95, 7--8 (2011), 926--941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Stephan Meier. 2006. A Survey of Economic Theories and Field Evidence on Pro-Social Behavior. SSRN Electron. J. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott Menard. 2002. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Theodore Millon, Melvin J Lerner, and Irving B Weiner. VOLUME 5 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 691.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Dennis T. Regan. 1971. Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 7, 6 (1971), 627--639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. David Reinstein and Gerhard Riener. 2012. Reputation and influence in charitable giving: An experiment. Theory Decis. 72, 2 (2012), 221--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. German Rodriguez. Models for Count Data With Overdispersion. 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Philipp Singer, Florian Lemmerich, Robert West, Leila Zia, Ellery Wulczyn, Markus Strohmaier, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Why We Read Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 1591--1600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Strakos Z. and Liesen J. 2005. On numerical stability in large scale linear algebraic computations. ZAMM - J. Appl. Math. Mech. Z. Für Angew. Math. Mech. 85, 5 (April 2005), 307--325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Behavioural Insights Team. 2013. Applying behavioural insights to charitable giving. Cabinet Off. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Ott Toomet, Siiri Silm, Erki Saluveer, Rein Ahas, and Tiit Tammaru. 2015. Where do ethno-linguistic groups meet? How copresence during free-time is related to copresence at home and at work. PloS One 10, 5 (2015), e0126093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Jakob Voss. 2005. Measuring wikipedia. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Morten Warncke-Wang, Vladislav R. Ayukaev, Brent Hecht, and Loren G. Terveen. 2015. The Success and Failure of Quality Improvement Projects in Peer Production Communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 743--756. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Morten Warncke-Wang, Dan Cosley, and John Riedl. 2013. Tell me more: an actionable quality model for Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Rick Wash. 2013. The Value of Completing Crowdfunding Projects. ICWSM 13, (2013), 7th.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas Wöhner and Ralf Peters. 2009. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Bowen Yu, Yuqing Ren, Loren Terveen, and Haiyi Zhu. 2017. Predicting Member Productivity and Withdrawal from Pre-Joining Attachments in Online Production Groups. 1775--1784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Xiaoquan Zhang and Feng Zhu. 2006. Intrinsic motivation of open content contributors: The case of Wikipedia. In Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. 2016--2017 Fundraising Report - Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2016--2017_Fundraising_ReportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. How does one interpret coefficients from regularized linear regression, considering multicollinearity present between independent variables? - Quora. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-interpret-coefficients-from-regularized-linear-regression-considering-multicollinearity-present-between-independent-variablesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Fundraising/2013--14 Report - Meta. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising/2013--14_ReportGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reciprocity and Donation: How Article Topic, Quality and Dwell Time Predict Banner Donation on Wikipedia

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader