Abstract
Donation-based support for open, peer production projects such as Wikipedia is an important mechanism for preserving their integrity and independence. For this reason understanding donation behavior and incentives is crucial in this context. In this work, using a dataset of aggregated donation information from Wikimedia's 2015 fund-raising campaign, representing nearly 1 million pages from English and French language versions of Wikipedia, we explore the relationship between the properties of contents of a page and the number of donations on this page. Our results suggest the existence of a reciprocity mechanism, meaning that articles that provide more utility value attract a higher rate of donation. We discuss these and other findings focusing on the impact they may have on the design of banner-based fundraising campaigns. Our findings shed more light on the mechanisms that lead people to donate to Wikipedia and the relation between properties of contents and donations.
- James Andreoni. 1989. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. J. Polit. Econ. 97, 6 (1989), 1447--1458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Andreoni. 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100, 401 (1990), 464--477.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dan Ariely, Anat Bracha, and Stephan Meier. 2009. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 1 (2009), 544--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Omar Azfar. 2001. The logic of collective action. In The Elgar companion to public choice. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Arun Balagopalan. 2012. Improving topic reproducibility in topic models. University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
- C. Daniel Batson. 2012. 12 A history of prosocial behavior research. Handb. Hist. Soc. Psychol. (2012), 243.Google Scholar
- David A. Belsley. 1991. Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. Wiley.Google Scholar
- David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google Scholar
- Gee-Woo Bock, Robert W. Zmud, Young-Gul Kim, and Jae-Nam Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q. (2005), 87--111. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert B. Cialdini. 2009. Influence: Science and practice. Pearson education Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia and Dario Taraborelli. 2015. MoodBar: Increasing new user retention in Wikipedia through lightweight socialization. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 734--742. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quang-Vinh Dang and Claudia-Lavinia Ignat. 2017. An end-to-end learning solution for assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott Dawson. 1988. Four motivations for charitable giving: Implications for ma. Mark. Health Serv. 8, 2 (1988), 31.Google Scholar
- Fabon Dzogang, Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, and Nello Cristianini. 2016. Seasonal Fluctuations in Collective Mood Revealed by Wikipedia Searches and Twitter Posts. In ICDM Workshops, 931--937.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Armin Falk. 2004. Charitable Giving as a Gift Exchange-Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2004).Google Scholar
- Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter. 2000. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 3 (2000), 159--181.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niall Firth. 2012. Crowdfunding successes show value of small donations. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Ruediger Glott, Philipp Schmidt, and Rishab Ghosh. 2010. Wikipedia survey--overview of results. U. N. Univ. Collab. Creat. Group (2010).Google Scholar
- Alvin W. Gouldner. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. (1960), 161--178.Google Scholar
- Aaron Halfaker. 2017. Interpolating Quality Dynamics in Wikipedia and Demonstrating the Keilana Effect. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym '17), 19:1--19:9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T. Morgan, and John Riedl. 2013. The rise and decline of an open collaboration system: How Wikipedia's reaction to popularity is causing its decline. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 5 (2013), 664--688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William T. Harbaugh. 1998. What do donations buy?: A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. J. Public Econ. 67, 2 (1998), 269--284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Hasan Dalip, Marcos André Gonçalves, Marco Cristo, and Pável Calado. 2009. Automatic quality assessment of content created collaboratively by web communities: a case study of wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, 295--304. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin A. McCabe, and Vernon L. Smith. 1996. On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. Int. J. Game Theory 25, 3 (1996), 289--301. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary Hsieh, Jilin Chen, Jalal Mahmud, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2014. You read what you value. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary Hsieh and Rafal Kocielnik. 2016. You get who you pay for: The impact of incentives on participation bias. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 823--835. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris S. Hulleman, Olga Godes, Bryan L. Hendricks, and Judith M. Harackiewicz. 2010. Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. J. Educ. Psychol. 102, 4 (2010), 880.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tamieka Jameson. 2017. Communication strategies as drivers of nonprofit donor retention. Walden University.Google Scholar
- John H. Kagel and Alvin E. Roth. 2016. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Volume 2: The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton university press.Google Scholar
- Beth Kanter and Aliza Sherman. 2016. The happy, healthy nonprofit: Strategies for impact without burnout. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Aniket Kittur, Ed H. Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2009. What's in Wikipedia?: mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1509--1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- George P. Knight, Lora G. Johnson, Gustavo Carlo, and Nancy Eisenberg. 1994. A multiplicative model of the dispositional antecedents of a prosocial behavior: Predicting more of the people more of the time. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66, 1 (1994), 178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rafal Kocielnik and Gary Hsieh. 2017. Send Me a Different Message: Utilizing Cognitive Space to Create Engaging Message Triggers. In CSCW, 2193--2207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tomás Kramár and Mária Bieliková. 2014. Context of seasonality in web search. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, 644--649.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicola Lacetera and Mario Macis. 2010. Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 76, 2 (2010), 225--237.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Leonhardt. 2008. What makes people give. N. Y. Times 9, (2008).Google Scholar
- Jonathan Meer. 2011. Brother, can you spare a dime? Peer pressure in charitable solicitation. J. Public Econ. 95, 7--8 (2011), 926--941.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephan Meier. 2006. A Survey of Economic Theories and Field Evidence on Pro-Social Behavior. SSRN Electron. J. (2006).Google Scholar
- Scott Menard. 2002. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage.Google Scholar
- Theodore Millon, Melvin J Lerner, and Irving B Weiner. VOLUME 5 PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 691.Google Scholar
- Dennis T. Regan. 1971. Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 7, 6 (1971), 627--639.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Reinstein and Gerhard Riener. 2012. Reputation and influence in charitable giving: An experiment. Theory Decis. 72, 2 (2012), 221--243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- German Rodriguez. Models for Count Data With Overdispersion. 7.Google Scholar
- Philipp Singer, Florian Lemmerich, Robert West, Leila Zia, Ellery Wulczyn, Markus Strohmaier, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Why We Read Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 1591--1600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strakos Z. and Liesen J. 2005. On numerical stability in large scale linear algebraic computations. ZAMM - J. Appl. Math. Mech. Z. Für Angew. Math. Mech. 85, 5 (April 2005), 307--325.Google Scholar
- Behavioural Insights Team. 2013. Applying behavioural insights to charitable giving. Cabinet Off. (2013).Google Scholar
- Ott Toomet, Siiri Silm, Erki Saluveer, Rein Ahas, and Tiit Tammaru. 2015. Where do ethno-linguistic groups meet? How copresence during free-time is related to copresence at home and at work. PloS One 10, 5 (2015), e0126093.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jakob Voss. 2005. Measuring wikipedia. (2005).Google Scholar
- Morten Warncke-Wang, Vladislav R. Ayukaev, Brent Hecht, and Loren G. Terveen. 2015. The Success and Failure of Quality Improvement Projects in Peer Production Communities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 743--756. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morten Warncke-Wang, Dan Cosley, and John Riedl. 2013. Tell me more: an actionable quality model for Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rick Wash. 2013. The Value of Completing Crowdfunding Projects. ICWSM 13, (2013), 7th.Google Scholar
- Thomas Wöhner and Ralf Peters. 2009. Assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles with lifecycle based metrics. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowen Yu, Yuqing Ren, Loren Terveen, and Haiyi Zhu. 2017. Predicting Member Productivity and Withdrawal from Pre-Joining Attachments in Online Production Groups. 1775--1784. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaoquan Zhang and Feng Zhu. 2006. Intrinsic motivation of open content contributors: The case of Wikipedia. In Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, 4.Google Scholar
- 2016--2017 Fundraising Report - Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2016--2017_Fundraising_ReportGoogle Scholar
- How does one interpret coefficients from regularized linear regression, considering multicollinearity present between independent variables? - Quora. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-interpret-coefficients-from-regularized-linear-regression-considering-multicollinearity-present-between-independent-variablesGoogle Scholar
- Fundraising/2013--14 Report - Meta. Retrieved April 19, 2018 from https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising/2013--14_ReportGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Reciprocity and Donation: How Article Topic, Quality and Dwell Time Predict Banner Donation on Wikipedia
Recommendations
Small Donation -- Big Impact: Visualizing Charitable Donations
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe want to encourage community engagement in charity by creating a new type of donation box. We learned that the purchasing power of food is much larger for charities than individuals. Our goal is to encourage cash donations by helping people visualize ...
Social exchange in online social networks. The reciprocity phenomenon on Facebook
Our research is focused on reciprocity, which is crucial for social exchanges.The online social network platform of our choice was Facebook, which is one of the most successful online social sites.In our study we found strong empirical evidence that an ...
Social Influence and Reciprocity in Online Gift Giving
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsGiving gifts is a fundamental part of human relationships that is being affected by technology. The Internet enables people to give at the last minute and over long distances, and to observe friends giving and receiving gifts. How online gift giving ...
Comments