skip to main content
10.1145/3240167.3240234acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobility experience types: towards designing a positive personal commuting experience

Published:29 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

To design successful, sustainable future mobility systems, it is crucial to provide incentives for commuters to change to eco-friendly alternative routes and means of transport. We believe that this can be realized by a user-centered, need-based design of a mobility infrastructure combined with an intelligent planning system that provides a positive commuting experience. As a first step towards this goal, we conducted interactive focus groups with commuters to identify their motivational drivers as well as opportunities for a positive, personalized commuting experience. The results reveal the demand to support the hedonic use of ways (taking routes for the enjoyable experience itself) and a segmentation into four mobility experience types (MxT) describing commuting and interaction preferences of commuters based on their need's profile.

References

  1. Jennifer Dungs, Daniel Duwe, Florian Herrmann, Alexander Schmidt, Sebastian Stegmüller, Ralf Gaydoul, Peter L. Peters, and Maik Sohl. 2016. The value of time - Potential for user-centered services offered by autonomous driving. Retrieved from http://publica.fraunhofer.de/dokumente/N-393764.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nora Fronemann and Matthias Peissner. 2014. User experience concept exploration: user needs as a source for innovation. In Proc. NordiCHI 2014. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 727--736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Silvia Gabrielli, Paula Forbes, Antti Jylhä, Simon Wells, Miika Sirén, Samuli Hemminki, Petteri Nurmi, Rosa Maimone, Judith Masthoff, and Giulio Jacucci. 2014. Design challenges in motivating change for sustainable urban mobility. Computers in Human Behavior 41 (Dec. 2014), 416--423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Silvia Gabrielli, Rosa Maimone, Paula Forbes, Judith Masthoff, Simon Wells, Laura Primerano, Laura Haverinen, Giancarlo Bo, and Marco Pompa. 2013. Designing motivational features for sustainable urban mobility. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1461--1466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, Anja Göritz. 2010. Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22, 353--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Marc Hassenzahl. 2008. User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In Proc. IHM 2008. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daniel L. Morgan. 1998. The focus group guidebook. Focus group kit 1. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Elena Not and Daniela Petrelli. 2018. Blending customisation, context-awareness and adaptivity for personalised tangible interaction in cultural heritage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (Jun. 2018), 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gustavo F. Tondello, Alberto Mora, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2017. Elements of Gameful Design Emerging from User Preferences. In Proc. CHI PLAY 2017. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. United States Census Bureau. 2017. American Community Survey 2012--2016 (Dec. 2017). Retrieved Apr. 25, 2018 from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2017/acs-5yr.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    September 2018
    1002 pages
    ISBN:9781450364379
    DOI:10.1145/3240167

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 September 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    NordiCHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate59of240submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader