skip to main content
10.1145/3229345.3229386acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Data Mining to Characterize Seasonal Patterns of Apis mellifera Honey Bee Colonies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Among the agricultural crops used for human consumption, 75% depends on pollination. As the principal pollinating agent, bees are essential for the food production for humans and the ecosystems sustainability. However, a combination of habitat destruction, climate change and exposure to pesticides and pathogens has led to a significant decrease in bee population. Here we propose a method to recognize status patterns of Apis mellifera colonies through the application of data mining techniques. Using a real dataset from the HiveTool.net containing Apis mellifera temperature, humidity and weight data, we identified 3 status patterns in the observed hive. Our results suggest that the recognized patterns are consistent with a honey bee colony life cycle. Based on the found patterns, we propose a high accuracy classification model capable of automatically identifying colony status for new samples.

References

  1. Marcelo A. Aizen and Lawrence D. Harder. 2009. The Global Stock of Domesticated Honey Bees Is Growing Slower Than Agricultural Demand for Pollination. Current Biology 19, 11 (2009), 915--918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Matthias Adolf Becher. 2010. The influence of developmental temperatures on division of labour in honeybee colonies. Ph.D. Dissertation. Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Diss., 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tadeusz Calinski and Jerzy Harabasz. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics 3, 1 (1974), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Thomas Cover and Peter Hart. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory 13, 1 (1967), 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David J Hand and Keming Yu. 2001. Idiot's Bayes: Not So Stupid after All? International Statistical Review 69, 3 (2001), 385--398.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Peter Kevan and Truman Phillips. 2001. The economic impacts of pollinator declines: an approach to assessing the consequences. Conservation Ecology 5, 1 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alexandra-Maria Klein, Bernard E Vaissiere, James H Cane, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Saul A Cunningham, Claire Kremen, and Teja Tscharntke. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274, 1608 (2007), 303--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Douglas Santiago Kridi, Carlos Giovanni Nunes de Carvalho, and Danielo Gonçalves Gomes. 2014. A predictive algorithm for mitigate swarming bees through proactive monitoring via wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM symposium on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, & ubiquitous networks. ACM, 41--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Douglas S. Kridi, Carlos Giovanni N. de Carvalho, and Danielo G. Gomes. 2016. Application of wireless sensor networks for beehive monitoring and in-hive thermal patterns detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 127 (2016), 221--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Armands Kviesis and Aleksejs Zacepins. 2016. Application of Neural Networks for Honey Bee Colony State Identification. In Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), 2016 17th International. IEEE, 413--417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Armands Kviesis, Aleksejs Zacepins, Mahmut Durgun, and Saban Tekin. 2015. Application of wireless sensor networks in precision apiculture. Engineering for Rural Development (2015), 440--445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. James MacQueen. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Vol. 1. Oakland, CA, USA., 281--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. G. Meikle and Niels Holst. 2015. Application of continuous monitoring of honeybee colonies. Apidologie 46, 1 (2015), 10--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fiona Edwards Murphy, Michele Magno, Pádraig M. Whelan, John O'Halloran, and Emanuel M. Popovici. 2016. b+ WSN: Smart beehive with preliminary decision tree analysis for agriculture and honey bee health monitoring. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 124 (2016), 211--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jeff Ollerton, Rachael Winfree, and Sam Tarrant. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120, 3 (2011), 321--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Madeleine M Ostwald, Michael L Smith, and Thomas D Seeley. 2016. The behavioral regulation of thirst, water collection and water storage in honey bee colonies. Journal of Experimental Biology 219, 14 (2016), 2156--2165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Simon G. Potts, V. L. Imperatriz-Fonseca, H. T. Ngo, J. C. Biesmeijer, Thomas D. Breeze, L. V. Dicks, L. A. Garibaldi, R. Hill, J. Settele, and A. J. Vanbergen. 2016. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Report. Bonn, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zheng-Yan Ruan, Chien-Hao Wang, Hong-Jen Lin, Chien-Peng Huang, Ying-Hao Chen, En-Cheng Yang, Chwan-Lu Tseng, and Joe-Air Jiang. 2017. An Internet of Things-Based Weight Monitoring System for Honey. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering 11, 6 (2017), 478--482.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Víctor Sánchez, Sergio Gil, José M. Flores, Francisco J. Quiles, Manuel A. Ortiz, and Juan J. Luna. 2015. Implementation of an electronic system to monitor the thermoregulatory capacity of honeybee colonies in hives with open-screened bottom boards. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 119 (2015), 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pang-Ning Tan, Michael Steinbach, and Vipin Kumar. 2009. Introdução ao data-mining: mineração de dados. Ciência Moderna.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Aleksejs Zacepins, Valters Brusbardis, Jurijs Meitalovs, and Egils Stalidzans. 2015. Challenges in the development of Precision Beekeeping. Biosystems Engineering 130 (2015), 60--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Aleksejs Zacepins and Toms Karasha. 2012. Web based system for the bee colony remote monitoring. In Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), 2012 6th International Conference on. IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Aleksejs Zacepins, Armands Kviesis, Aldis Pecka, and Vitalijs Osadcuks. 2017. Development of Internet of Things concept for Precision Beekeeping. In Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), 2017 18th International. IEEE, 23--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Data Mining to Characterize Seasonal Patterns of Apis mellifera Honey Bee Colonies

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SBSI '18: Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
          June 2018
          578 pages
          ISBN:9781450365598
          DOI:10.1145/3229345

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 June 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate181of557submissions,32%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader