skip to main content
10.1145/3219819.3219963acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Deep Adversarial Learning for Multi-Modality Missing Data Completion

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multi-modality data are widely used in clinical applications, such as tumor detection and brain disease diagnosis. Different modalities can usually provide complementary information, which commonly leads to improved performance. However, some modalities are commonly missing for some subjects due to various technical and practical reasons. As a result, multi-modality data are usually incomplete, raising the multi-modality missing data completion problem. In this work, we formulate the problem as a conditional image generation task and propose an encoder-decoder deep neural network to tackle this problem. Specifically, the model takes the existing modality as input and generates the missing modality. By employing an auxiliary adversarial loss, our model is able to generate high-quality missing modality images. At the same time, we propose to incorporate the available category information of subjects in training to enable the model to generate more informative images. We evaluate our method on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative~(ADNI) database, where positron emission tomography~(PET) modalities are missing. Experimental results show that the trained network can generate high-quality PET modalities based on existing magnetic resonance imaging~(MRI) modalities, and provide complementary information to improve the detection and tracking of the Alzheimer's disease. Our results also show that the proposed methods generate higher quality images than baseline methods as measured by various image quality statistics.

References

  1. Le An, Pei Zhang, Ehsan Adeli, Yan Wang, Guangkai Ma, Feng Shi, David S Lalush, Weili Lin, and Dinggang Shen . 2016. Multi-level canonical correlation analysis for standard-dose PET image estimation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing Vol. 25, 7 (2016), 3303--3315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vijay Badrinarayanan, Alex Kendall, and Roberto Cipolla . 2017. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence Vol. 39, 12 (2017), 2481--2495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Xi Chen, Yan Duan, Rein Houthooft, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Pieter Abbeel . 2016. Infogan: Interpretable representation learning by information maximizing generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2172--2180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Özgün cCiccek, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Soeren S Lienkamp, Thomas Brox, and Olaf Ronneberger . 2016. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 424--432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Emily L Denton, Soumith Chintala, Rob Fergus, et almbox. . 2015. Deep generative image models using a Laplacian pyramid of adversarial networks Advances in neural information processing systems. 1486--1494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang . 2016. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Vol. 38, 2 (2016), 295--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hao Dong, Paarth Neekhara, Chao Wu, and Yike Guo . 2017. Unsupervised image-to-image translation with generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02676 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alexey Dosovitskiy, Jost Tobias Springenberg, and Thomas Brox . 2015. Learning to generate chairs with convolutional neural networks Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 1538--1546.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hongyang Gao, Hao Yuan, Zhengyang Wang, and Shuiwang Ji . 2017. Pixel Deconvolutional Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06820 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio . 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2672--2680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun . 2016. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Laurens van der Maaten . 2017. Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Vol. Vol. 1. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy . 2015. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Phillip Isola, Jun-Yan Zhu, Tinghui Zhou, and Alexei A Efros . 2017. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. arXiv preprint (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Shuiwang Ji, Wei Xu, Ming Yang, and Kai Yu . 2013. 3D convolutional neural networks for human action recognition. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence Vol. 35, 1 (2013), 221--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba . 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton . 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks Advances in neural information processing systems. 1097--1105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton . 2015. Deep learning. nature Vol. 521, 7553 (2015), 436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner . 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE Vol. 86, 11 (1998), 2278--2324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et almbox. . 2016. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rongjian Li, Wenlu Zhang, Heung-Il Suk, Li Wang, Jiang Li, Dinggang Shen, and Shuiwang Ji . 2014. Deep learning based imaging data completion for improved brain disease diagnosis International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 305--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell . 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 3431--3440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael Mathieu, Camille Couprie, and Yann LeCun . 2015. Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05440 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehdi Mirza and Simon Osindero . 2014. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Augustus Odena, Christopher Olah, and Jonathon Shlens . 2016. Conditional image synthesis with auxiliary classifier gans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.09585 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala . 2015. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox . 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 234--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. SC Strother, ME Casey, and EJ Hoffman . 1990. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts. Ieee transactions on nuclear science Vol. 37, 2 (1990), 783--788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Qi Wang, Mengying Sun, Liang Zhan, Paul Thompson, Shuiwang Ji, and Jiayu Zhou . 2017 b. Multi-Modality Disease Modeling via Collective Deep Matrix Factorization Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1155--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yan Wang, Guangkai Ma, Le An, Feng Shi, Pei Zhang, David S Lalush, Xi Wu, Yifei Pu, Jiliu Zhou, and Dinggang Shen . 2017 a. Semisupervised tripled dictionary learning for standard-dose PET image prediction using low-dose PET and multimodal MRI. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Vol. 64, 3 (2017), 569--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli . 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing Vol. 13, 4 (2004), 600--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Michael W Weiner, Dallas P Veitch, Paul S Aisen, Laurel A Beckett, Nigel J Cairns, Robert C Green, Danielle Harvey, Clifford R Jack, William Jagust, Enchi Liu, et almbox. . 2013. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association Vol. 9, 5 (2013), e111--e194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shuo Xiang, Lei Yuan, Wei Fan, Yalin Wang, Paul M Thompson, and Jieping Ye . 2013. Multi-source learning with block-wise missing data for Alzheimer's disease prediction. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 185--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Shuo Xiang, Lei Yuan, Wei Fan, Yalin Wang, Paul M Thompson, and Jieping Ye . 2014. Bi-level multi-source learning for heterogeneous block-wise missing data. NeuroImage Vol. 102, 0 (2014), 192--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Tao Xu, Han Zhang, Xiaolei Huang, Shaoting Zhang, and Dimitris N Metaxas . 2016. Multimodal deep learning for cervical dysplasia diagnosis International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 115--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Han Zhang, Tao Xu, Hongsheng Li, Shaoting Zhang, Xiaolei Huang, Xiaogang Wang, and Dimitris Metaxas . 2017. Stackgan: Text to photo-realistic image synthesis with stacked generative adversarial networks. In IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision. 5907--5915.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Shaoting Zhang and Dimitris Metaxas . 2016. Large-Scale medical image analytics: Recent methodologies, applications and Future directions. Medical Image Analysis Vol. 33 (2016), 98--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A Efros . 2017. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10593 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Deep Adversarial Learning for Multi-Modality Missing Data Completion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        KDD '18: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
        July 2018
        2925 pages
        ISBN:9781450355520
        DOI:10.1145/3219819

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 July 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of983submissions,11%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader