skip to main content
10.1145/3202185.3210793acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empowering children to author digital media effects for reader's theatre

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Reader's Theatre (RT) is a pedagogical activity, in which the children read aloud to an audience. Prior research established that the RT can be used to foster reading fluency and ultimately to increase reading skills [11]. However, this activity still has the margin to grow its potential. One way to support and empower children in this pedagogical activity is by allowing them to collaboratively define digital media effects that can be triggered when the reading activity takes place. In this paper, we describe STREEN (Story Reading

Environmental Enrichment), an immersive multimodal learning environment, which was inspired in the classical Reader's Theatre. STREEN is being directed towards primary school children and follows a Design-Based Research approach. Following the description of the system, we share findings gathered in the co-design sessions with children and discuss the obtained design insights.

References

  1. Terry Anderson and Julie Shattuck. 2012. Design-Based Research A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher 41, 1: 16--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Vanessa Cesário, Paulo Freitas, Diana Pimentel, and Valentina Nisi. 2016. Children's Books: Paper VS Digital, What Do They Prefer? Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 625--630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tracy D. |O'Connor Garrett. 2010. Readers' Theater: "Hold on, Let's Read It Again." TEACHING Exceptional Children 43, 1: 6--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Arthur M. Glenberg, Andrew B. Goldberg, and Xiaojin Zhu. 2011. Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science 39, 1: 27--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Young-Suk Grace Kim, Chea Hyeong Park, and Richard K. Wagner. 2014. Is Oral/Text Reading Fluency a "Bridge" to Reading Comprehension? Reading and writing 27, 1: 79--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rebecca Linke, Tina Kothe, and Florian Alt. 2017. TaBooGa: A Hybrid Learning App to Support Children's Reading Motivation. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, 278--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Louis Major, Bjoern Haßler, and Sara Hennessy. 2017. Tablet Use in Schools: Impact, Affordances and Considerations. In Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools. Springer, Cham, 115--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Amelia Moody. 2010. Using Electronic Books in the Classroom to Enhance Emergent Literacy Skills in Young Children. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 23--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Roxana Moreno and Richard Mayer. 2007. Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review 19, 3: 309--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Maryann Mraz, William Nichols, Safronia Caldwell, Rene Beisley, Stephan Sargent, and William Rupley. 2013. Improving Oral Reading Fluency through Readers Theatre. Reading Horizons 52, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ina V. S. Mullis, Martin, Michael O., Pierre Foy, and Martin Hooper. PIRLS 2016 International Results in Reading. Retrieved March 2, 2018, from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/international-results/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Janette Pelletier and Ruth Beatty. 2015. Children's understanding of Aesop's fables: relations to reading comprehension and theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pedro Ribeiro, Anna Michel, Ido Iurgel, Christian Ressel, Cristina Sylla, and Wolfgang Müller. 2018. Designing a Smart Reading Environment with and for Children. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM, 88--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. George Schafer, Keith Green, Ian Walker, Susan King Fullerton, and Elise Lewis. 2014. An Interactive, Cyber-physical Read-aloud Environment: Results and Lessons from an Evaluation Activity with Children and Their Teachers. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 865--874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Empowering children to author digital media effects for reader's theatre

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children
        June 2018
        789 pages
        ISBN:9781450351522
        DOI:10.1145/3202185

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        IDC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate28of96submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

        Upcoming Conference

        IDC '24
        Interaction Design and Children
        June 17 - 20, 2024
        Delft , Netherlands

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader