skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3186965acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration
Free Access

THOR: Text-enabled Analytics for Humanitarian Operations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this demonstration, we present the Text-enabled Humanitarian Operations in Real-time (THOR) framework, which is being prototyped to provide visual and analytical situational awareness to humanitarian and disaster relief (HADR) planners. THOR is a collaborative effort between industrial and university research laboratories, designed with an intent to support both military and civilian HADR operations. At its core, THOR is powered by a domain-specific knowledge graph, which is derived from natural language outputs and is amenable to real-time analytics. THOR is designed to operate in low-resource linguistic environments, process heterogeneous data, including news and social media, reason about arbitrary disasters not knowable in advance, and provide advanced graphical interaction capabilities. We will demo the latest prototype of THOR using an interactive case study situation.

References

  1. Fabian Abel, Claudia Hauff, Geert-Jan Houben, Richard Stronkman, and Ke Tao. 2012. Twitcident: fighting fire with information from social web streams Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 305--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Yusup Aibaidulla and Kim-Teng Lua. 2003. The development of tagged Uyghur corpus. Proceedings of PACLIC17 (2003), 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brian Anderson and Sumeth Vongpanitlerd. 2006. Network analysis and synthesis. Dover.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rudy Arthur, Chris A Boulton, Humphrey Shotton, and Hywel TP Williams. 2017. Social Sensing of Floods in the UK. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04695 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marco Avvenuti, Stefano Cresci, Mariantonietta N La Polla, Andrea Marchetti, and Maurizio Tesconi. 2014. Earthquake emergency management by social sensing. Pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOM workshops), 2014 IEEE international conference on. IEEE, 587--592.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cosmin Adrian Bejan and Sanda Harabagiu. 2014. Unsupervised event coreference resolution. Computational Linguistics Vol. 40, 2 (2014), 311--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research Vol. 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Seonhwa Choi and Byunggul Bae. 2015. The real-time monitoring system of social big data for disaster management. Computer Science and its Applications. Springer, 809--815.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrew Crooks, Arie Croitoru, Anthony Stefanidis, and Jacek Radzikowski. 2013. # Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 17, 1 (2013), 124--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Daniel Delling, Peter Sanders, Dominik Schultes, and Dorothea Wagner. 2009. Engineering route planning algorithms. Algorithmics of large and complex networks. Springer, 117--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lise Getoor and Ashwin Machanavajjhala. 2013. Entity resolution for big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1527--1527. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Xingsheng He, Di Lu, Drew Margolin, Mengdi Wang, Salma El Idrissi, and Yu-Ru Lin. 2017. The signals and noise: Actionable information in improvised social media channels during a disaster. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference. ACM, 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Ji Lucas, Patrick Meier, and Sarah Vieweg. 2014. AIDR: Artificial intelligence for disaster response Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 159--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Muhammad Imran, Shady Elbassuoni, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Patrick Meier. 2013. Extracting information nuggets from disaster-Related messages in social media. ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ann Irvine and Alexandre Klementiev. 2010. Using Mechanical Turk to annotate lexicons for less commonly used languages Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Association for Computational Linguistics, 108--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Peter Jackson and Isabelle Moulinier. 2007. Natural language processing for online applications: Text retrieval, extraction and categorization. Vol. Vol. 5. John Benjamins Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ashutosh Sopan Jadhav, Hemant Purohit, Pavan Kapanipathi, Pramod Anantharam, Ajith H Ranabahu, Vinh Nguyen, Pablo N Mendes, Alan Gary Smith, Michael Cooney, and Amit P Sheth. 2010. Twitris 2.0: Semantically empowered system for understanding perceptions from social data. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Grigoris Karvounarakis, Zachary G Ives, and Val Tannen. 2010. Querying data provenance. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. ACM, 951--962. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Philipp Koehn, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch, Chris Callison-Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan, Wade Shen, Christine Moran, Richard Zens, et almbox. 2007. Moses: Open source toolkit for statistical machine translation Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the ACL on interactive poster and demonstration sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics, 177--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Andrea Moro, Alessandro Raganato, and Roberto Navigli. 2014. Entity linking meets word sense disambiguation: a unified approach. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 2 (2014), 231--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Nathan Morrow, Nancy Mock, Adam Papendieck, and Nicholas Kocmich. 2011. Independent evaluation of the Ushahidi Haiti project. Development Information Systems International Vol. 8 (2011), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. David Nadeau and Satoshi Sekine. 2007. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes Vol. 30, 1 (2007), 3--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, et almbox. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 2, 1--2 (2008), 1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jakob Rogstadius, Maja Vukovic, CA Teixeira, Vassilis Kostakos, Evangelos Karapanos, and Jim Alain Laredo. 2013. CrisisTracker: Crowdsourced social media curation for disaster awareness. IBM Journal of Research and Development Vol. 57, 5 (2013), 4--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 851--860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Axel Schulz, Petar Ristoski, and Heiko Paulheim. 2013. I see a car crash: Real-time detection of small scale incidents in microblogs Extended Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 22--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomer Simon, Avishay Goldberg, and Bruria Adini. 2015. Socializing in emergencies--A review of the use of social media in emergency situations. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 35, 5 (2015), 609--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Michael Stonebraker, Uǧur cCetintemel, and Stan Zdonik. 2005. The 8 requirements of real-time stream processing. ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. 34, 4 (2005), 42--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pedro Szekely, Craig A Knoblock, Jason Slepicka, Andrew Philpot, Amandeep Singh, Chengye Yin, Dipsy Kapoor, Prem Natarajan, Daniel Marcu, Kevin Knight, et almbox. 2015. Building and using a knowledge graph to combat human trafficking International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 205--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Dennis Thom, Robert Krüger, Thomas Ertl, Ulrike Bechstedt, Axel Platz, Julia Zisgen, and Bernd Volland. 2015. Can twitter really save your life A case study of visual social media analytics for situation awareness. In Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2015 IEEE Pacific. IEEE, 183--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sarah Vieweg, Amanda L Hughes, Kate Starbird, and Leysia Palen. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1079--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Quan Wang, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. 2015. Knowledge Base Completion Using Embeddings and Rules. IJCAI. 1859--1866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Linhong Zhu, Majid Ghasemi-Gol, Pedro Szekely, Aram Galstyan, and Craig A Knoblock. 2016. Unsupervised Entity Resolution on Multi-type Graphs International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 649--667.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. THOR: Text-enabled Analytics for Humanitarian Operations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
          April 2018
          2023 pages
          ISBN:9781450356404

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

          Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 April 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • demonstration

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format