skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3186242acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Processing Social Media Messages in Mass Emergency: Survey Summary

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Millions of people use social media to share information during disasters and mass emergencies. Information available on social media, particularly in the early hours of an event when few other sources are available, can be extremely valuable for emergency responders and decision makers, helping them gain situational awareness and plan relief efforts. Processing social media content to obtain such information involves solving multiple challenges, including parsing brief and informal messages, handling information overload, and prioritizing different types of information. These challenges can be mapped to information processing operations such as filtering, classifying, ranking, aggregating, extracting, and summarizing. This work highlights these challenges and presents state of the art computational techniques to deal with social media messages, focusing on their application to crisis scenarios.

References

  1. Mohammed Ali Al-garadi, Muhammad Sadiq Khan, Kasturi Dewi Varathan, Ghulam Mujtaba, and Abdelkodose M Al-Kabsi. 2016. Using online social networks to track a pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of biomedical informatics Vol. 62 (2016), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Firoj Alam, Muhammad Imran, and Ferda Ofli. 2017. Image4Act: Online Social Media Image Processing for Disaster Response. Proc. of ASONAM. 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. James Allan. 2012. Topic detection and tracking: event-based information organization. Vol. Vol. 12. Springer Science & Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Javed Aslam, Fernando Diaz, Matthew Ekstrand-Abueg, Richard McCreadie, Virgil Pavlu, and Tetsuya Sakai. 2015. TREC 2014 temporal summarization track overview. Technical Report. NIST.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Marco Avvenuti, Stefano Cresci, Andrea Marchetti, Carlo Meletti, and Maurizio Tesconi. 2014. EARS (earthquake alert and report system): a real time decision support system for earthquake crisis management. In Proc. of KDD. ACM, 1749--1758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michele Berlingerio, Francesco Calabrese, Giusy Di Lorenzo, Xiaowen Dong, Yiannis Gkoufas, and Dimitrios Mavroeidis. 2013. SaferCity: a system for detecting and analyzing incidents from social media Proc. of ICDM Workshops. IEEE, 1077--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jingwen Bian, Yang Yang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2013. Multimedia summarization for trending topics in microblogs Proc. of CIKM. ACM, 1807--1812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Carlos Castillo. 2016. Big crisis data: social media in disasters and time-critical situations. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proc. of WWW. ACM, 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tao Chen, Dongyuan Lu, Min-Yen Kan, and Peng Cui. 2013. Understanding and classifying image tweets. In Proc. of ACM MM. ACM, 781--784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Soudip Roy Chowdhury, Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Rizwan Asghar, Sihem Amer-Yahia, and Carlos Castillo. 2013. Tweet4act: Using incident-specific profiles for classifying crisis-related messages. Proc. of ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Courtney D Corley, Chase Dowling, Stuart J Rose, and Taylor McKenzie. 2013. Social sensor analytics: Measuring phenomenology at scale Proc. of ISI. IEEE, 61--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. John Harrald and Theresa Jefferson. 2007. Shared situational awareness in emergency management mitigation and response Proc. of HICSS. IEEE, 23--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Amanda L Hughes and Leysia Palen. 2012. The evolving role of the public information officer: An examination of social media in emergency management. J. of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Vol. 9, 1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Amanda L Hughes, Steve Peterson, and Leysia Palen. 2014 a. Social media in emergency management. Issues in Disaster Science and Management: A Critical Dialogue Between Scientists and Emergency Managers (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amanda L Hughes, Lise AA St Denis, Leysia Palen, and Kenneth M Anderson. 2014 b. Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy Proc. of SIGCHI. ACM, 1505--1514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Muhammad Imran and Carlos Castillo. 2015. Towards a data-driven approach to identify crisis-related topics in social media streams Proc. of WWW. ACM, 1205--1210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) Vol. 47, 4 (2015), 67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Ji Lucas, Patrick Meier, and Sarah Vieweg. 2014. AIDR: Artificial intelligence for disaster response Proc. of WWW. ACM, 159--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Muhammad Imran, Sanjay Chawla, and Carlos Castillo. 2016 a. A robust framework for classifying evolving document streams in an expert-machine-crowd setting. In Proc. of ICDM. IEEE, 961--966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Muhammad Imran, Prasenjit Mitra, and Carlos Castillo. 2016 b. Twitter as a Lifeline: Human-annotated Twitter Corpora for NLP of Crisis-related Messages Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016) (23--28). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Muhammad Imran, Prasenjit Mitra, and Jaideep Srivastava. 2016 c. Enabling Rapid Classification of Social Media Communications During Crises. Int. J. of Inf. Sys. for Crisis Response and Management, Vol. 8, 3 (2016), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Chris Kedzie, Kathleen McKeown, and Fernando Diaz. 2014. Summarizing disasters over time. In Proc. of KDD Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chris Kedzie, Kathleen McKeown, and Fernando Diaz. 2015. Predicting Salient Updates for Disaster Summarization. Proc. of ACL.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Yuan Liang, James Caverlee, and John Mander. 2013. Text vs. images: on the viability of social media to assess earthquake damage Proc. of WWW. ACM, 1003--1006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Alan M MacEachren, Anuj Jaiswal, Anthony C Robinson, Scott Pezanowski, Alexander Savelyev, Prasenjit Mitra, Xiao Zhang, and Justine Blanford. 2011. Senseplace2: Geotwitter analytics support for situational awareness Proc. of VAST. IEEE, 181--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Patrick Meier. 2015. Digital humanitarians: how big data is changing the face of humanitarian response. CRC Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Leonardo Neumeyer, Bruce Robbins, Anish Nair, and Anand Kesari. 2010. S4: Distributed stream computing platform. In Proc. of ICDM Workshops. IEEE, 170--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Dat Tien Nguyen, Kamla Al-Mannai, Shafiq R Joty, Hassan Sajjad, Muhammad Imran, and Prasenjit Mitra. 2017 a. Robust Classification of Crisis-Related Data on Social Networks Using Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proc. of ICWSM. 632--635.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Dat Tien Nguyen, Firoj Alam, Ferda Ofli, and Muhammad Imran. 2017 b. Automatic Image Filtering on Social Networks Using Deep Learning and Perceptual Hashing During Crises. In Proc. of ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Dat Tien Nguyen, Shafiq Joty, Muhammad Imran, Hassan Sajjad, and Prasenjit Mitra. 2016 a. Applications of Online Deep Learning for Crisis Response Using Social Media Information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01030 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Dat Tien Nguyen, Kamela Ali Al Mannai, Shafiq Joty, Hassan Sajjad, Muhammad Imran, and Prasenjit Mitra. 2016 b. Rapid Classification of Crisis-Related Data on Social Networks using Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03902 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Dat Tien Nguyen, Ferda Ofli, Muhammad Imran, and Prasenjit Mitra. 2017 c. Damage Assessment from Social Media Imagery Data During Disasters Proc. of ASONAM. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferda Ofli, Patrick Meier, Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Devis Tuia, Nicolas Rey, Julien Briant, Pauline Millet, Friedrich Reinhard, Matthew Parkan, et almbox. 2016. Combining human computing and machine learning to make sense of big (aerial) data for disaster response. Big data, Vol. 4, 1 (2016), 47--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2014. CrisisLex: A Lexicon for Collecting and Filtering Microblogged Communications in Crises. Proc. of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Robin Peters and Porto de Albuqerque Joao. 2015. Investigating images as indicators for relevant social media messages in disaster management Proc. of ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Robert Power, Bella Robinson, John Colton, and Mark Cameron. 2014. Emergency situation awareness: Twitter case studies Proc. of ISCRAM MED. Springer, 218--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Hemant Purohit and Amit P Sheth. 2013. Twitris v3: From Citizen Sensing to Analysis, Coordination and Action. Proc. of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Vahed Qazvinian, Emily Rosengren, Dragomir R Radev, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs Proc. of EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1589--1599. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Alan Ritter, Oren Etzioni, Sam Clark, et almbox. 2012. Open domain event extraction from twitter. In Proc. of KDD. ACM, 1104--1112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Bella Robinson, Robert Power, and Mark Cameron. 2013. A sensitive twitter earthquake detector. In Proc. of WWW. ACM, 999--1002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jakob Rogstadius, Maja Vukovic, CA Teixeira, Vassilis Kostakos, Evangelos Karapanos, and Jim Alain Laredo. 2013. CrisisTracker: Crowdsourced social media curation for disaster awareness. IBM J. of Research and Development Vol. 57, 5 (2013), 4--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Koustav Rudra, Siddhartha Banerjee, Niloy Ganguly, Pawan Goyal, Muhammad Imran, and Prasenjit Mitra. 2016. Summarizing Situational and Topical Information During Crises. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01561 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Koustav Rudra, Ashish Sharma, Niloy Ganguly, and Muhammad Imran. 2017. Classifying Information from Microblogs during Epidemics Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health. ACM, 104--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors Proc. of WWW. ACM, 851--860. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Diane H Sonnenwald and Linda G Pierce. 2000. Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Inf. Proc. & Mgmt., Vol. 36, 3 (2000), 461--479. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Kate Starbird, Leysia Palen, Amanda L Hughes, and Sarah Vieweg. 2010. Chatter on the red: what hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proc. of CSCW. ACM, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Sarah Vieweg, Carlos Castillo, and Muhammad Imran. 2014. Integrating social media communications into the rapid assessment of sudden onset disasters Proc. of SOCINFO. Springer, 444--461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarah Vieweg, Amanda L Hughes, Kate Starbird, and Leysia Palen. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proc. of SIGCHI. ACM, 1079--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Jianshu Weng and Bu-Sung Lee. 2011. Event detection in twitter. Proc. of ICWSM Vol. 11 (2011), 401--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Shize Xu, Liang Kong, and Yan Zhang. 2012. A picture paints a thousand words: a method of generating image-text timelines Proc. of CIKM. ACM, 2511--2514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Processing Social Media Messages in Mass Emergency: Survey Summary

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
            April 2018
            2023 pages
            ISBN:9781450356404

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

            Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 April 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format