skip to main content
10.1145/3175603.3175611acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicraiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital Image Vegetation Analysis with Machine Learning

Published:29 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose computer vision based approach for effectively computing the vegetation coverage of the image to determine the structure of the vegetation and to understand wildlife habitat. To deal with the variation of lighting condition, two-stage segmentation strategy is applied. Firstly, texture information is used to roughly classify the vegetation and the reference blackboard at each position using Support Vector Machine. And then a K-means based adaptive color model is used to refine the segmentation result in pixel level. We evaluate our approach on our dataset, and the results demonstrate that the proposed method is robust to environment changing, and color instability. For blackboard localization, we tested 200 images and the accuracy is approximately 93%. For grass detection and coverage computation, the error rate is approximately 3%.

References

  1. Jorgensen, C.F., Stutzman, R.J., Anderson, L.C., E Decker, S., Powell, L.A., Schacht, W.H. and Fontaine, J.J. 2013. Choosing a DIVA: a comparison of emerging digital imagery vegetation analysis techniques. Applied Vegetation Science, 16(4), pp. 552--560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Limb, R.F., Hickman, K.R., Engle, D.M., Norland, J.E. and Fuhlendorf, S.D. 2007. Digital photography: reduced investigator variation in visual obstruction measurements for southern tallgrass prairie. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 60(5), pp. 548--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Leis, S.A. and Morrison, L.W. 2011. Field test of digital photography biomass estimation technique in tallgrass prairie. Rangeland ecology & management, 64(1), pp. 99--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Morrison, L.W. 2015. Observer error in vegetation surveys: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology, 9(4), pp. 367--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Robel, R.J., Briggs, J.N., Dayton, A.D. and Hulbert, L.C. 1970. Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. Journal of Range Management, pp. 295--297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nudds, T.D. 1977. Quantifying the vegetative structure of wildlife cover. Wildlife Society Bulletin, pp. 113--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cagney, J., Cox, S.E. and Booth, D.T. 2011. Comparison of point intercept and image analysis for monitoring rangeland transects. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 64(3), pp. 309--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Booth, D.T., Cox, S.E. and Johnson, D.E. 2005. Detection-threshold calibration and other factors influencing digital measurements of ground cover. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 58(6), pp. 598--604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dalal, N. and Triggs, B. 2005, June. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005. IEEE Computer Society Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 886--893). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. He, D.C. and Wang, L. 1990. Texture unit, texture spectrum, and texture analysis. IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(4), pp. 509--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Digital Image Vegetation Analysis with Machine Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICRAI '17: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence
      December 2017
      127 pages
      ISBN:9781450353588
      DOI:10.1145/3175603

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 December 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader