skip to main content
10.1145/3173225.3173236acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Through the Glance Mug: A Familiar Artefact to Support Opportunistic Search in Meetings

Published:18 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

During collocated meetings, the spontaneous need for information, called opportunistic search, might arise while conversing. However, using smartphones to look up information might be disruptive, disrespectful or even embarrassing in social contexts. We propose an alternative instrument for this practice: Glance Mug, a touch-sensitive mug prototype that listens to the conversation and displays browsable content-driven results on its inner screen. We organized 15 pairs of one-to-one meetings between students to gather user reflections. The user study revealed that the mug has the potential for supporting instant search and affords sufficient subtlety to conceal user actions. Yet, it provoked some anxiety for the users in maintaining eye contact with their partners. Our main contributions are the context-aware mug concept tested in a real-life setting and the analysis through Hornecker and Buur's Tangible Interaction Framework that discusses its design space, and its impact on the users and social interaction.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

fp1049.mp4

mp4

9.7 MB

References

  1. Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, and Paul Roe. 2017. Technology Individuation: The Foibles of Augmented Everyday Objects. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6632--6644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, Daniel Wigdor, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Supporting Subtlety with Deceptive Devices and Illusory Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 1489--1498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paul M. Aoki and Allison Woodruff. 2005. Making Space for Stories: Ambiguity in the Design of Personal Communication Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael Beigl, Hans-W. Gellersen, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2001. Mediacups: experience with design and use of computer-augmented everyday artefacts. Computer Networks 35, 4: 401--409. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tilde Bekker and Janienke Sturm. 2009. Stimulating Physical and Social Activity Through Open-ended Play. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '09), 309--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ahmet Börütecene, Idil Bostan, Tilbe Göksun, and Oğuzhan Özcan. 2016. Informing Design Decisions for Advice Mediating Handheld Devices by Studying Coffee Cup Reading. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16), 7:1--7:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ahmet Börütecene, ğdil Bostan, Gülben Şanli, Çağlar Genç, Tilbe Göksun, and Oğuzhan Özcan. 2017. Coffee Cup Reading as an Inspiration for Looking into Augmented Mugs in Social Interaction. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Understanding Users and Contexts (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 199--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Oscar de Bruijn and Robert Spence. 2001. Serendipity within a Ubiquitous Computing Environment: A Case for Opportunistic Browsing. In Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 362--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hyemin Chung, Chia-Hsun Jackie Lee, and Ted Selker. 2006. Lover's Cups: Drinking Interfaces As New Communication Channels. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06), 375--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Karen Church, Antony Cousin, and Nuria Oliver. 2012. I Wanted to Settle a Bet!: Understanding Why and How People Use Mobile Search in Social Settings. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '12), 393--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Enrico Costanza, Samuel A. Inverso, Rebecca Allen, and Pattie Maes. 2007. Intimate Interfaces in Action: Assessing the Usability and Subtlety of Emg-based Motionless Gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), 819--828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jared Donovan and Robb Mitchell. 2010. Social Contraptions and Embodied Interaction. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference Adjunct Papers on Ubiquitous Computing - Adjunct (UbiComp '10 Adjunct), 403--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David Finlay. 1982. Motion Perception in the Peripheral Visual Field. Perception 11, 4: 457--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity As a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Luc Geurts and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2012. Splash Controllers: Game Controllers Involving the Uncareful Manipulation of Water. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12), 183--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Trevor Hogan and Eva Hornecker. 2017. Towards a Design Space for Multisensory Data Representation. Interacting with Computers 29, 2: 147--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jason Hong. Considering Privacy Issues in the Context of Google Glass. Retrieved December 8, 2017 from https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2013/11/169041-considering-privacy-issues-in-the-context-of-google-glass/fulltext Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shamsi T. Iqbal, Jonathan Grudin, and Eric Horvitz. 2011. Peripheral Computing During Presentations: Perspectives on Costs and Preferences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 891--894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao and Chris Schmandt. 2015. MugShots: A Mug Display for Front and Back Stage Social Interaction in the Workplace. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15), 57--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lisa Kleinman. 2007. Physically Present, Mentally Absent: Technology Use in Face-to-face Meetings. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07), 2501--2506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nan Li and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2012. Designing Conversation-context Recommendation Display to Support Opportunistic Search in Meetings. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '12), 12:1--12:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Bruno Nadeau and Amanda Williams. 2009. Tactful Interaction: Exploring Interactive Social Touch Through a Collaborative Tangible Installation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '09), 147--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Leysia Palen, Marilyn Salzman, and Ed Youngs. 2000. Going Wireless: Behavior & Practice of New Mobile Phone Users. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '00), 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Max Van Kleek, Dave Murray-Rust, Amy Guy, Kieron O'Hara, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2016. Computationally Mediated Pro-Social Deception. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 552--563. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jay Vidyarthi, Alissa N. Antle, and Bernhard E. Riecke. 2011. Sympathetic Guitar: Can a Digitally Augmented Guitar Be a Social Entity? In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11), 1819--1824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vessyl. Retrieved June 14, 2016 from https://www.myvessyl.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Yecup: Your Perfect Wireless Smart Mug. Retrieved June 14, 2016 from http://yecup.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Paulig Muki. Retrieved February 8, 2016 from http://www.pauligmuki.com/index.php?lang=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Cogi - Beyond Notes. Retrieved January 14, 2017 from https://cogi.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Speech API - Speech Recognition. Google Cloud Platform. Retrieved January 16, 2017 from https://cloud.google.com/speech/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Google Knowledge Graph Search API | Knowledge Graph Search API. Google Developers. Retrieved January 16, 2017 from https://developers.google.com/knowledge-graph/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Intel shows off a light-up smart mug, because why not? Engadget. Retrieved February 8, 2016 from http://www.engadget.com/2014/01/07/intel-smart-mug-concept/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Through the Glance Mug: A Familiar Artefact to Support Opportunistic Search in Meetings

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            TEI '18: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
            March 2018
            763 pages
            ISBN:9781450355681
            DOI:10.1145/3173225

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 March 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            TEI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of130submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader