skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154922acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

SCAUT: using patient-generated data to improve remote monitoring of cardiac device patients

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The main problem with remote monitoring of cardiac device patients relates to inefficient communication. This is because patients and clinicians are separated in space and time. In the SCAUT project (2014--2018) we experiment with asynchronous interaction and explore how different types of patient-generated data can improve collaboration. The types of data that patients generate using the SCAUT patient app includes symptom experiences (categories/audio/numeric values), context (activity level/audio), medication list and travel information. We find that it is very important to consider how the data that patients enter can become useful for patients and clinicians simultaneously.

References

  1. Andersen, T.O., Bansler, J.P., Kensing, F., and Moll, J. 2017. From Prototype to Product: Making Participatory Design of mHealth Commercially Viable. In A.M. Kanstrup, A. Bygholm, P. Bertelsen and C. Nøhr, eds., Participatory Design Health Information Technology. IOS Press, 95--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, T.O., Bjørn, P., Kensing, F., and Moll, J. 2011. Designing for collaborative interpretation in telemonitoring: Re-introducing patients as diagnostic agents. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80, 8, e112--e126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Grudin, J. 1988. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In Proceedings of the conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW '88), 85--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Oudshoorn, N. 2008. Diagnosis at a distance: the invisible work of patients and healthcare professionals in cardiac telemonitoring technology. Sociology of health & illness 30, 2, 272--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ricci, R.P., Morichelli, L., D'onofrio, A., Calò, L., Vaccari, D., Zanotto, G., Curnis, A., Buja, G., Rovai, N. and Gargaro, A. 2014. Manpower and outpatient clinic workload for remote monitoring of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: data from the HomeGuide Registry. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 25(11), 1216--1223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Skov, M.B., Johansen, P.G., Skov, C.S., and Lauberg, A. 2015. No News is Good News: Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Patients. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 827--836. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader