skip to main content
10.1145/3152896.3152905acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

mmWave for future public safety communications

Published:11 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The technologies developed for the next generation of cellular networks (i.e., 5G) are potential enablers for future Public Safety Communication (PSC) systems. These will indeed need advanced communication techniques, capable of providing real-time, low-latency and reliable interactions in different scenarios (vehicular, aerial, unmanned) and different network architectures. There is great interest in the millimeter wave (mmWave) band and in general in the spectrum above 6 GHz, since the bandwidth that can be allocated at these frequencies is much higher compared to the traditional (and congested) sub-6 GHz bands. This would enable orders of magnitude greater throughput and low latency, which could be used for example to stream high definition video or virtual/augmented reality data to first responders or for the remote control of autonomous robots. In this paper we illustrate both the potential of mmWave communications for PSC (also with a typical use case) and the issues that must be solved before this technology can be reliably adopted and mmWave PSC networks become a reality.

References

  1. 3GPP. 2016. Study on Scenarios and Requirements for Next Generation Access Technologies. TR 38.913, Rel. 14. (October 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 3GPP. 2017. LS on set of configuration values for SS burst set periodicity. Intel - Tdoc R1-1706708. (April 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. W. B. Abbas and M. Zorzi. 2016. Towards an Appropriate Receiver Beamforming Scheme for Millimeter Wave Communication: A Power Consumption Based Comparison. In 22th European Wireless Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M.R. Akdeniz, Y. Liu, M.K. Samimi, S. Sun, S. Rangan, T.S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip. 2014. Millimeter Wave Channel Modeling and Cellular Capacity Evaluation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm. 32, 6 (June 2014), 1164--1179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Baldini, S. Karanasios, D. Allen, and F. Vergari. 2014. Survey of Wireless Communication Technologies for Public Safety. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 16, 2 (September 2014), 619--641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. ETSI. 2015. Satellite Earth Stations and Systems (SES); Reference scenario for the deployment of emergency communications. TS 103 260. (May 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Russell Ford, Menglei Zhang, Sourjya Dutta, Marco Mezzavilla, Sundeep Rangan, and Michele Zorzi. 2016. A framework for end-to-end evaluation of 5G mmWave cellular networks in ns-3. In Proceedings of the Workshop on ns-3. ACM, 85--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Ford, M. Zhang, M. Mezzavilla, S. Dutta, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi. 2017. Achieving Ultra-Low Latency in 5G Millimeter Wave Cellular Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 3 (March 2017), 196--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Ghafoor, P. D. Sutton, C. J. Sreenan, and K. N. Brown. 2014. Cognitive radio for disaster response networks: survey, potential, and challenges. IEEE Wireless Communications 21, 5 (October 2014), 70--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Giordani, M. Mezzavilla, C. N. Barati, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi. 2016. Comparative analysis of initial access techniques in 5G mmWave cellular networks. In Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS). 268--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Giordani, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi. 2017. Millimeter wave communication in vehicular networks: Challenges and opportunities. In 2017 6th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Farooq Khan and Zhouyue Pi. 2011. An introduction to millimeter-wave mobile broadband systems. IEEE Comm. Mag. 49, 6 (June 2011), 101--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Khawaja, I. Guvenc, and D. Matolak. 2016. UWB Channel Sounding and Modeling for UAV Air-to-Ground Propagation Channels. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. Khawaja, O. Ozdemir, and I. Guvenc. 2017. UAV Air-to-Ground Channel Characterization for mmWave Systems. ArXiv e-prints (July 2017). arXiv:cs.IT/1707.04621Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Kumbhar, F. Koohifar, I. Guvenc, and B. Mueller. 2017. A Survey on Legacy and Emerging Technologies for Public Safety Communications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19, 1 (September 2017), 97--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Toni Levanen, Juho Pirskanen, and Mikko Valkama. 2014. Radio interface design for ultra-low latency millimeter-wave communications in 5G era. In Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps). 1420--1426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yingzhe Li, Jeffrey G Andrews, François Baccelli, Thomas D Novlan, and Charlie Zhang. 2016. Design and Analysis of Initial Access in Millimeter Wave Cellular Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05582 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Z. Liu, R. Sengupta, and A. Kurzhanskiy. 2017. A power consumption model for multi-rotor small unmanned aircraft systems. In 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). 310--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonathan S. Lu, Daniel Steinbach, Patrick Cabrol, and Philip Pietraski. 2012. Modeling Human Blockers in Millimeter Wave Radio Links. ZTE Communications 10, 4 (December 2012), 23--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. George R. MacCartney, Jr., Shu Sun, Theodore S. Rappaport, Yunchou Xing, Hangsong Yan, Jeton Koka, Ruichen Wang, and Dian Yu. 2016. Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications: New Results for Rural Connectivity. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on All Things Cellular: Operations, Applications and Challenges. 31--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Merwaday, A. Tuncer, A. Kumbhar, and I. Guvenc. 2016. Improved Throughput Coverage in Natural Disasters: Unmanned Aerial Base Stations for Public-Safety Communications. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 11, 4 (December 2016), 53--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Marco Mezzavilla, Michele Polese, Andrea Zanella, Aditya Dhananjay, Sundeep Rangan, Coitt Kessler, Ted Rappaport, and Michele Zorzi. 2017. Public Safety Communications above 6 GHz: Challenges and Opportunities. To appear on IEEE Access - Special Section on Mission Critical Public-Safety Communications: Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Future Applications (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marco Mezzavilla, Menglei Zhang, Michele Polese, Russell Ford, Sourjya Dutta, Sundeep Rangan, and Michele Zorzi. 2017. End-to-End Simulation of 5G mmWave Networks. Submitted to IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02882Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. NGMN Alliance. 2015. NGMN 5G WHITE PAPER. (Februray 2015). https://www.ngmn.org/uploads/media/NGMN_5G_White_Paper_V1_0.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Polese, M. Giordani, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi. 2017. Improved Handover Through Dual Connectivity in 5G mmWave Mobile Networks. IEEE JSAC Special Issue on Millimeter Wave Communications for Future Mobile Networks 35, 9 (September 2017), 2069--2084.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Polese, R. Jana, and M. Zorzi. 2017. TCP in 5G mmWave Networks: Link Level Retransmissions and MP-TCP. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Michele Polese, Marco Mezzavilla, Sundeep Rangan, and Michele Zorzi. 2017. Mobility Management for TCP in mmWave Networks. (2017), 11--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip. 2014. Millimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges. Proc. IEEE 102, 3 (March 2014), 366--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Theodore S Rappaport, Shu Sun, Rimma Mayzus, Hang Zhao, Yaniv Azar, Kevin Wang, George N Wong, Jocelyn K Schulz, Matthew Samimi, and Felix Gutierrez. 2013. Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! IEEE Access 1 (May 2013), 335--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. SAFECOM, US communications program of the Department of Homeland Security. 2006. Public Safety Statements of Requirements for Communications and Interoperability Vols. I and II. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tracy McElvaney. 2015. 5G: From a Public Safety Perspective. (2015). http://www.atis.org/5g/presentations/5G_PublicSafety_TMcElvaney.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Vutha Va, Takayuki Shimizu, Gaurav Bansal, and Robert W. Heath Jr. 2016. Millimeter Wave Vehicular Communications: A Survey. Found. Trends Netw. 10, 1 (June 2016), 1--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Menglei Zhang, Marco Mezzavilla, Russell Ford, Sundeep Rangan, Shivendra Panwar, Evangelos Mellios, Di Kong, Andrew Nix, and Michele Zorzi. 2016. Transport layer performance in 5G mmWave cellular. In IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). 730--735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Menglei Zhang, Marco Mezzavilla, Jing Zhu, Sundeep Rangan, and Shivendra S. Panwar. 2016. The Bufferbloat Problem over Intermittent Multi-Gbps mmWave Links. CoRR abs/1611.02117 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Menglei Zhang, Michele Polese, Marco Mezzavilla, Sundeep Rangan, and Michele Zorzi. 2017. ns-3 Implementation of the 3GPP MIMO Channel Model for Frequency Spectrum above 6 GHz. In Proceedings of the Workshop on ns-3. ACM, 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. H. Zhao, R. Mayzus, S. Sun, M. Samimi, J. K. Schulz, Y. Azar, K. Wang, G. N. Wong, F. Gutierrez, and T. S. Rappaport. 2013. 28 GHz millimeter wave cellular communication measurements for reflection and penetration loss in and around buildings in New York city. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 5163--5167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. mmWave for future public safety communications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        I-TENDER '17: Proceedings of the First CoNEXT Workshop on ICT Tools for Emergency Networks and DisastEr Relief
        December 2017
        53 pages
        ISBN:9781450354240
        DOI:10.1145/3152896

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 December 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader