skip to main content
10.1145/3144826.3145400acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An architecture for skill assessment in serious games based on Event Sequence Analysis

Published:18 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Serious games are video games with educational purposes. Players interact in many points during a gameplay. These interactions can be registered, producing data sets with sequence of events which provide relevant information about player's skills. Unfortunately, traditional skill assessment methods present limitations to carry out a detailed analysis of large data sets. Sequence Analysis is a group of techniques which allow to analyze data sets consisting of sequence of events. These techniques have been successfully implemented in different fields, and we consider that they can help overcome these limitations. In this paper, we propose an architecture of skill assessment in learning experiences based on serious games using a set of Sequence Analysis techniques known as Process Mining. First, several in-game events are stored in a log. These events are produced by player's interactions with Key Performance Indicators included in the game. Second, event log is used as input for a Process Mining tool. Discovery process is executed and a behavioural model is provided. Third, an assessment metric must be carried out over the model. Finally, a synthetic experiment is conducted and promising results are obtained.

References

  1. Graven, O. H. and MacKinnon, L. 2005. A survey of current state-of-the art support for lifelong learning. In 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training 2005 (Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 9-9 July 2005). ITHET '05. IEEE, F2C/19-F2C/25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Palés-Argullós, J., Nolla-Domenjó, M., Oriol-Bosch, a., and Gual, a. 2010. Proceso de Bolonia (I): educación orientada a competencias. Educación Médica. 13, 3 (Sep. 2010), 127--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Traverso-Ribón, I., Balderas-Alberico, A., Dodero, J. M., Ruiz-Rube, I., and Palomo-Duarte, M. 2016. Open data framework for sustainable assessment of project-based learning experiences. Program. 50, 4, 380--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J. L., Palomo-Duarte, M., and Dodero, J. M. 2016. Motivation, students' needs and learning outcomes: a hybrid game-based app for enhanced language learning. SpringerPlus. 5, 1 (Aug. 2016), 1305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It's not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE review, 41(2), 16--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., and Jessel, J. P. 2011. Classifying serious games: the G/P/S model. In Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation through educational games: Multidisciplinary approaches, P. Felicia, Ed. IGI Global. Hershey, PA, 118--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Abbott, A. 1995. Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas. Annual review of sociology. 21, 1, 93--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Adriansyah, A., De Medeiros, A. K. A., Arcieri, F., Baier, T., Blickle, T., ... and Burattin, A. 2012. Process mining manifesto. In International Conference on Business Process Management. Berlin, Germany: Springer Heidelberg. BPM '11 Workshops. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 99, 169--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Abt, C. C. 1970. Serious games: The art and science of games that simulate life. New York Viking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sawyer, B. 2002. Serious Games: Improving Public Policy through Game-based Learning and Simulation (No. 2002-1). Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zyda, M. 2005. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer. 38, 9, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael, D. and Chen, S. 2006. Serious games. Games that educate, train, and inform. Thomson Course Technology, Boston, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Buckingham, D. and Scanlon, M. 2000. That is edutainment: media, pedagogy and the market place. Paper presented to the International Forum of Researchers on Young People and the Media (Sydney, Australia, November).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Corti, K. 2006. Games-based Learning; a serious business application. Informe de Pixel Learning. 34, 6, 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Prensky, M. 2001. Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Schmidt, R., Emmerich, K., and Schmidt, B. 2015. Applied Games -- In Search of a New Definition. In 14th International Conference in Entertainment Computing (Trondheim, Norway). ICEC '15. Springer International Publishing, 100--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Crisp, G. T. 2012. Integrative assessment: reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 37, 1, 33--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ifenthaler, D., Eseryel, D., and Ge, X. 2012. Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives. Springer New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chaudy, Y., Connolly, T., and Hainey, T. 2013. Specification and Design of a Generalized Assessment Engine for GBL Applications. In 7th European Conference on Games Based Learning (Oporto, Portugal). ECGBL, 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, S. and Michael, D. 2005. Proof of Learning: Assessment in Serious Games. Gamasutra. Retrieved from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/2433/proof_of_learning_assessment_in_.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Caballero-Hernández, J. A., Palomo-Duarte, M., Dodero, J. M. 2017. Skill assessment in learning experiences based on serious games: A Systematic Mapping Study. Computers & Education. 113, (Oct. 2017), 42--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Danto, A. C. 1985. Narration and Knowledge. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse. Cornell Univ. Press, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sampson, R. J. and Laub, J. H. 1993. Crime in the Making. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Abbott, A. 1997. Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces. 75, 4 (Jun. 1997), 1149--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Oliver, P. E. 1993. Formal models of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology. 19, 1 (Aug. 1993), 271--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Abbott, A. 1992. From causes to events notes on narrative positivism. Sociological Methods & Research. 20, 4 (May. 1992), 428--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time series analysis (Vol. 2). Princeton university press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Steele, F. 2005. Event history analysis. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Batagelj, V., Kejžar, N., Korenjak-Èerne, S., and Zaveršnik, M. 2006. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. van der Aalst, W. M. P. 2010. Process Mining Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Raposo, F., Santos, G., and Pereira, J. 2013. SimClinic - An auxiliary tool for evaluation on clinical case settings. In 4th Serious Games Development and Applications (Trondheim, Norway, September 25-27). SGDA '13. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 8101, 37--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Petersen, S. and Bedek, M. 2012. Challenges and opportunities in evaluating learning in serious games: A look at behavioural aspects. In 3rd Serious Games Development and Applications (Bremen, Germany, September 26-29). SGDA '12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 7528, 219--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An architecture for skill assessment in serious games based on Event Sequence Analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          TEEM 2017: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
          October 2017
          723 pages
          ISBN:9781450353861
          DOI:10.1145/3144826

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          TEEM 2017 Paper Acceptance Rate84of109submissions,77%Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader