skip to main content
research-article

Hacking with NPOs: Collaborative Analytics and Broker Roles in Civic Data Hackathons

Published:06 December 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recently Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) are adopting more and more data-driven approaches to their work, yet NPOs often lack appropriate tools and expertise in such data related works. To compensate, many NPOs are using a new form of collaboration, civic data hackathons, to leverage on external volunteers' data expertise. In this paper, we sought to understand how civic data hackathons could generate impactful data analytics for NPOs' data-driven work, and how to support collaborative data analytics during hackathons. We collected various types of data (observations, surveys, and interviews) from two civic data hackathons with 9 NPOs and over 300 data volunteers in a Midwestern city in the U.S. Our results describe the collaboration activities and the types of actionable collaborative analytics outputs generated from these activities. We also identify a unique social group (i.e., client teams), who help with preparing and coordinating the event, perform brokering activities to support the collaborative analytics through the civic data hackathons. This broker role is vital for the success of the collaboration between domain experts and data experts. Our findings contribute to the CSCW research on the collaborative work of interdisciplinary hackathons, and to a broader understanding of civic data collaborations.

References

  1. Jennifer Alexander, Jeffrey L. Brudney, Kaifeng Yang, Kelly Leroux and Nathaniel S Wright. 2010. Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39, 4: 571--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chris Bopp, Ellie Harmon and Amy Voida. 2017. Disempowered by data: nonprofits, social enterprises, and the consequences of data-driven work. In Proceedings of CHI '17, 3608--3619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Gregorio Convertino and Craig H. Ganoe. 2006. Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting with Computers 18, 1: 21--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joohee Choi. 2017. Characteristics of collaboration in the emerging practice of open data analysis. In Proceedings of CSCW '17, 835--846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gregorio Convertino, Helena M Mentis, Aleksandra Slavkovic, Mary Beth Rosson and John M Carroll. 2011. Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning: A design research project. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18, 4: 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carl Disalvo, Thomas Lodato, Jonathan Lukens and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In Proceedings of CHI '14, 2397--2406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of CSCW '92, 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sheena Erete, Emily Ryou, Geoff Smith, Khristina Fassett and Sarah Duda. 2016. Storytelling with data: examining the use of data by non-profit organizations. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 1273--1283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michael B. Gurstein. 2011. Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday 16, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jeffrey Heer and Maneesh Agrawala. 2006. Software design patterns for information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jeffrey Heer and Maneesh Agrawala. 2007. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. In Proceedings of VAST IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel Hellmann, Carleen Maitland and Andrea Tapia. 2016. Collaborative analytics and brokering in digital humanitarian response. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 1284--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Youyang Hou and Cliff Lampe. 2015. Social media effectiveness for public engagement: example of small nonprofits. In Proceedings of CHI '15, 3107--3116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lilly Irani. 2015. Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology & Human Values 40, 5: 799--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Peter Johnson and Pamela Robinson. 2014. Civic hackathons: innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of Policy Research 31, 4: 349--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Erik Lakomaa and Jan Kallberg. 2013. Open data as a foundation for innovation: The enabling effect of free public sector information for entrepreneurs. IEEE Access 1, 558--563.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Michael Lenczner and Susan Phillips. 2012. From stories to evidence: how mining data can promote innovation in the nonprofit sector. Technology Innovation Management Review 2, 7: 10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Thomas James Lodato and Carl Disalvo. 2016. Issue-oriented hackathons as material participation. New Media & Society 18, 4: 539 - 557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nan L. Maxwell, Dana Rotz and Christina Garcia. 2016. Data and decision making: Same organization, different perceptions; different organizations, different perceptions. American Journal of Evaluation 37, 4: 463--485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. David W. Mcdonald and Mark S. Ackerman. 1998. Just talk to me: A field study of expertise location. In Proceedings of CSCW '98, 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. David W. Mcdonald and Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. In Proceedings of CSCW '00, 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Cecelia Merkel, Umer Farooq, Lu Xiao, Craig Ganoe, Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. 2007. Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: Methodological challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of CHIMIT '07, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jonathan Morgan, Wikimedia Foundation, Dharma Dailey and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2017. Hacking and making at time-bounded events: Current trends and next steps in research and event Design. In Proceedings of CSCW '17 Companion, 363--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Andreas Paepcke. 1996. Information needs in technical work settings and their implications for the design of computer tools. CSCW 5, 1: 63--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. D. Pawlowski, Dan Robey and A. Raven. 2000. Supporting shared information systems: Boundary objects, communities, and brokering. Conference on Information Systems 329--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Suzanne D. Pawlowski, Daniel Robey and Daniel Robey. 2004. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly 28, 4: 645--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Matthew Richardson and Ryen W White. 2011. Supporting synchronous social Q&A throughout the question lifecycle. In Proceedings of WWW '11, 755--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Stephanie B. Steinhardt and Steven J. Jackson. 2015. Anticipation work: Cultivating vision in collective practice. In Proceedings of CSCW '15, 443--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Erik H. Trainer, Arun Kalyanasundaram, Chalalai Chaihirunkarn and James D. Herbsleb. 2016. How to hackathon: Socio-technical tradeoffs in brief, intensive collocation. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 1118--1130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon and Ban Al-Ani. 2011. Homebrew databases: Complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In Proceedings of CHI '11, 915--924. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Dakuo Wang, Youyang Hou, Lin Luo and Yingxin Pan. 2016. Answerer engagement in an enterprise social question & answering system. In Proceedings of IConference '16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthew Weinstein. 2006. TAMS analyzer: Anthropology as cultural critique in a digital age. Social Science Computer Review 24, 1: 68--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Etienne Wenger. 2003. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7, 2: 76--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Hacking with NPOs: Collaborative Analytics and Broker Roles in Civic Data Hackathons

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 1, Issue CSCW
      November 2017
      2095 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3171581
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 December 2017
      Published in pacmhci Volume 1, Issue CSCW

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader