skip to main content
10.1145/3099023.3099090acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Cultural Heritage Gaming: Effects of Human Cognitive Styles on Players' Performance and Visual Behavior

Published:09 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Common design practices of current cultural heritage activities barely take into account the contextual, cultural, and cognitive characteristics of visitors. Bearing in mind that information processing is substantial in such activities, this paper investigates the interplay among human cognitive differences and cultural heritage gaming activities towards players' performance and visual behavior. Three user studies were conducted under the field dependence/independence theory, which underpin cognitive differences in visual perceptiveness and contextual information handling. Findings are expected to provide useful insights for practitioners and researchers with the aim to design playful cultural activities tailored to the users' cognitive preferences.

References

  1. Eike Falk Anderson, Leigh McLoughlin, Fotis Liarokapis, Christopher Peters, Panagiotis Petridis, and Sara de Freitas 2010. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art Review. Virtual Reality. 14, 4 (2010), 255--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Michela Mortara, Chiara Eva Catalano, Francesco Bellotti, Giusy Fiucci, Minica Houry-Panchetti, and Panagiotis Petridis 2014. Learning cultural heritage by serious games. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 15, 3 (2014), 318--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Maria Kozhevnikov 2007. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin. 133, 3 (2007), 464--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Charoula Angeli, Nicos Valanides, and Paul Kirschner 2009. Field dependence--independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior. 25, 6 (Nov. 2009), 1355--1366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Christina Katsini, Christos Fidas, Marios Belk, Nikolaos Avouris, and George Samaras 2017. Influences of Users' Cognitive Strategies on Graphical Password Composition. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17 (New York, New York, USA, 2017), 2698--2705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Franco Mawad, Marcela Trías, Ana Giménez, Alejandro Maiche, and Gastón Ares 2015. Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study. Food Research International. 74, (2015), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Herman. A. Witkin, Carol A. Moore, Donald R. Goodenough, and Patricia W. Cox 1975. Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and their Educational Implications. ETS Research Bulletin Series. 1975, 2 (Dec. 1975), 1--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Yannick Naudet, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Eric Tobias, Angeliki Antoniou, Jenny Rompa, and George Lepouras 2013. Gaming and cognitive profiles for recommendations in museums. Proceedings - 8th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization, SMAP 2013. (2013), 67--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paula Goodale, Paul David Clough, Samuel Fernando, Nigel Ford, and Mark Stevenson 2014. Cognitive styles within an exploratory search system for digital libraries. Journal of Documentation. 70, 6 (Oct. 2014), 970--996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris 2016. Do Field Dependence-Independence Differences of Game Players Affect Performance and Behaviour in Cultural Heritage Games? Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16 (New York, New York, USA, 2016), 38--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. George E. Raptis, Christos A. Fidas, and Nikolaos M. Avouris 2016. Using Eye Tracking to Identify Cognitive Differences: A Brief Literature Review. 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference in Informatics (Patras, Greece, 2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. George E. Raptis, Christos Fidas, and Nikolaos Avouris 2016. A qualitative analysis of the effect of wholistic-analytic cognitive style dimension on the cultural heritage game playing. 2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) (Jul. 2016), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. George Raptis, Christina Katsini, Marios Belk, Christos Fidas, George Samaras, and Nikos Avouris 2017. Using Eye Gaze Data and Visual Activities to Infer Human Cognitive Styles: Method and Feasibility Studies. 2017 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (Bratislava, Slovakia, 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Massimo Zancanaro, Tsvi Kuflik, and Zvi Boger 2007. Analyzing museum visitors' behavior patterns. User Modeling. 4511, (2007), 238--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tsvi Kuflik, Zvi Boger, and Massimo Zancanaro 2012. Analysis and prediction of museum visitors' behavioral pattern types. Cognitive Technologies. (2012), 161--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cultural Heritage Gaming: Effects of Human Cognitive Styles on Players' Performance and Visual Behavior

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UMAP '17: Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
          July 2017
          456 pages
          ISBN:9781450350679
          DOI:10.1145/3099023

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 July 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader