skip to main content
10.1145/3054977.3055003acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotdiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Towards an Optimized BlockChain for IoT

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

There has been increasing interest in adopting BlockChain (BC), that underpins the crypto-currency Bitcoin, in Internet of Things (IoT) for security and privacy. However, BCs are computationally expensive and involve high bandwidth overhead and delays, which are not suitable for most IoT devices. This paper proposes a lightweight BC-based architecture for IoT that virtually eliminates the overheads of classic BC, while maintaining most of its security and privacy benefits. IoT devices benefit from a private immutable ledger, that acts similar to BC but is managed centrally, to optimize energy consumption. High resource devices create an overlay network to implement a publicly accessible distributed BC that ensures end-to-end security and privacy. The proposed architecture uses distributed trust to reduce the block validation processing time. We explore our approach in a smart home setting as a representative case study for broader IoT applications. Qualitative evaluation of the architecture under common threat models highlights its effectiveness in providing security and privacy for IoT applications. Simulations demonstrate that our method decreases packet and processing overhead significantly compared to the BC implementation used in Bitcoin.

References

  1. Abdullahi Arabo, Ian Brown, and Fadi El-Moussa. 2012. Privacy in the age of mobility and smart devices in smart homes. In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE, 819--826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Giacomo Brambilla, Michele Amoretti, and Francesco Zanichelli. 2016. Using Block Chain for Peer-to-Peer Proof-of-Location. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00174 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, Erez Shmueli, Samuel S Wang, and Alex Sandy Pentland. 2014. openpds: Protecting the privacy of metadata through safeanswers. PloS one 9, 7 (2014), e98790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ali Dorri, Salil S Kanhere, Raja Jurdak, and Praveen Gauravaram. 2017. Blockchain for IoT Security and Privacy: The Case Study of a Smart Home. In IEEE Percom workshop on security privacy and trust in the internet of thing. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Aditya Gaur, Bryan Scotney, Gerard Parr, and Sally McClean. 2015. Smart city architecture and its applications based on IoT. Procedia Computer Science 52 (2015), 1089--1094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sayed Hadi Hashemi, Faraz Faghri, Paul Rausch, and Roy H Campbell. 2016. World of Empowered IoT Users. In 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI). IEEE, 13--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Moeen Hassanalieragh, Alex Page, Tolga Soyata, Gaurav Sharma, Mehmet Aktas, Gonzalo Mateos, Burak Kantarci, and Silvana Andreescu. 2015. Health monitoring and management using Internet-of-Things (IoT) sensing with cloud-based processing: Opportunities and challenges. In Services Computing (SCC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 285--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Qi Jing, Athanasios V Vasilakos, Jiafu Wan, Jingwei Lu, and Dechao Qiu. 2014. Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks 20, 8 (2014), 2481--2501. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Apostolos Kousaridas, Stefanos Falangitis, Panagis Magdalinos, Nancy Alonistioti, and Markus Dillinger. 2015. SYSTAS: Density-based algorithm for clusters discovery in wireless networks. In Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2015 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on. IEEE, 2126--2131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Vijay Sivaraman, Hassan Habibi Gharakheili, Arun Vishwanath, Roksana Boreli, and Olivier Mehani. 2015. Network-level security and privacy control for smarthome IoT devices. In Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 163--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shawn Wilkinson, Jim Lowry, and Tome Boshevski. 2014. Metadiska blockchain-based decentralized file storage application. Technical Report. Technical Report. http://metadisk.org/metadisk.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiao Yue, Huiju Wang, Dawei Jin, Mingqiang Li, and Wei Jiang. 2016. Healthcare Data Gateways: Found Healthcare Intelligence on Blockchain with Novel Privacy Risk Control. Journal of medical systems 40, 10 (2016), 218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IoTDI '17: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation
    April 2017
    353 pages
    ISBN:9781450349666
    DOI:10.1145/3054977

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 April 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Upcoming Conference

    IoTDI '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader