skip to main content
10.1145/3027385.3029456acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

What are visitors up to?: helping museum facilitators know what visitors are doing

Published:13 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe a tablet application designed around an interactive game-based science museum exhibit. It is aimed to help provide museum docents useful information about the visitors' actions, in a way that is actionable, and enables docents to provide assistance and prompts to visitors that are more meaningful, compared to what they are typically able to do without this interface augmentation.

References

  1. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Land, S. M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 61--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Lyons, L., Tissenbaum, M., Berland, M., Eydt, R., Wielgus, L., & Mechtley, A. (2015, June). Designing visible engineering: supporting tinkering performances in museums. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 49--58). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Petrich, M., Wilkinson, K., & Bevan, B. (2013). It looks like fun, but are they learning. Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators, 50--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Resnick, M., & Rosenbaum, E. (2013). Designing for tinkerability. Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators, 163--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryoo, J. J., Bulalacao, N., Kekelis, L., McLeod, E., & Henriquez, B. (2015). Tinkering with "failure": Equity, learning, and the iterative design process. In FabLearn 2015 Conference at Stanford University, September 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stenerson, M. E., Salmon, A., Berland, M., & Squire, K. (2014, October). Adage: an open API for data collection in educational games. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play (pp. 437--438). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tissenbaum, M., Kumar, V., & Berland, M. Modeling Visitor Behavior in a Game-Based Engineering Museum Exhibit with Hidden Markov Models. In The Ninth International Conference on Educational Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tissenbaum, M., Kumar, V., Berland, M. (Accepted, 2017) What are you doing over there? Understanding Transitions from Unproductive to Productive States in Open-Ended Inquiry. At the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. What are visitors up to?: helping museum facilitators know what visitors are doing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        LAK '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference
        March 2017
        631 pages
        ISBN:9781450348706
        DOI:10.1145/3027385

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 March 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        LAK '17 Paper Acceptance Rate36of114submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader