skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tobiko: A Contact Array for Self-Configuring, Surface-Powered Sensors

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a contact array that outputs the maximum and minimum voltages at its contacts. The goal is to extract power for a detachable touch sensor, display, or other human-computer interaction (HCI) device that is attached to a surface by a user, and that does not have its own power source. Experimental results are shown for an array that has positive and negative outputs and a pass-through at each contact position. It solves the startup problem for a randomly-placed batteryless sensor patch or sticker, which can scan its ports to discover neighboring devices only after it obtains power. Applications include user-configurable electronic textile circuits, and new methods for prototyping and repairing large-area flexible circuits. This note describes construction of a 7x7 array, provides design rules, and examines the signal quality on two kinds of electronic surfaces.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1287-file3.mp4

mp4

8.5 MB

pn1287p.mp4

mp4

5.1 MB

References

  1. Leah Buechley, David Mellis, Hannah Perner-Wilson, Emily Lovell, Bonifaz Kaufmann. 2010. Living wall: programmable wallpaper for interactive spaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 1401--1402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Wataru Honda, Shingo Harada, Takayuki Arie, Seiji Akita, Kuniharu Takei. 2014. Wearable, Human-Interactive, Health-Monitoring, Wireless Devices Fabricated by Macroscale Printing Techniques. Advanced Functional Materials 24, 22 (2014), 3299--3304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Guido Gioberto, Lucy E. Dunne. 2013. Overlockstitched stretch sensors: characterization and effect of fabric property. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management 8, 3 (2013), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Asimina Kiourti, John L. Volakis. 2015. Highgeometrical-accuracy embroidery process for textile antennas with fine details. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 14 (2015), 1474--1477. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Thomas Vervust, Guy Buyle, Frederick Bossuyt, Jan Vanfleteren. 2012. Integration of stretchable and washable electronic modules for smart textile applications. Journal of The Textile Institute 103, 10 (2012), 1127--1138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mary Ellen Berglund, Julia Duvall, Cory Simon, Lucy E. Dunne. 2015. Surface-mount component attachment for e-textiles. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 65--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ivan Poupyrev, Nan-Wei Gong, Shiho Fukuhara, Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Carsten Schwesig, Karen E. Robinson. 2016. Project Jacquard: Interactive Digital Textiles at Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4216--4227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nicholas Farrow, Naren Sivagnanadasan, Nikolaus Correll. 2014. Gesture based distributed user interaction system for a reconfigurable self-organizing smart wall. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, 245--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cindy K. Harnett. 2012. Trilife: A Kit for Large Group Workshops. Demonstration at Open Hardware Summit, NY, NY, September 27. Retrieved September 19, 2016 from http://issuu.com/harnettlab/docs/trilifeposterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andreas Mehmann, Matija Varga, Karl Gönner, Gerhard Tröster. 2015. A ball-grid-array-like electronics-to-textile pocket connector for wearable electronics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 57--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Open Dots project http://opendotsalliance.org/technicalinformation/application-notes/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffmann, Frank, James Scott, Mike Addlesee, Glenford Mapp, Andy Hopper. "Data transport on the networked surface." In Local Computer Networks, 2001. Proceedings. LCN 2001. 26th Annual IEEE Conference on, pp. 269--277. IEEE, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Scott, James, Frank Hoffmann, Mike Addlesee, Glenford Mapp, Andy Hopper. "Networked surfaces: a new concept in mobile networking." Mobile Networks and Applications 7, no. 5 (2002): 353--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hoffmann, Frank, and James Scott. "Location of mobile devices using Networked Surfaces." In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 281--298. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Steurer, Philipp, and Mani B. Srivastava. "System design of smart table." In Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2003.(PerCom 2003). Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on, pp. 473--480. IEEE, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. John A. Rogers, Takao Someya, Yonggang Huang. 2010. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327, 5973 (2010), 1603--1607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Leonard S. Buchoff, Joseph P. Kosiarski, Chris A. Dalamangas. 1976. Method of making electrically conductive connector. U.S. Patent No. 3,982,320. WA, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Myung-Jin Yim, Kyung-Wook Paik. 1997. Design and understanding of anisotropic conductive films (ACFs) for LCD packaging. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Symposium on Polymeric Electronics Packaging, 233--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Etienne Palleau, Stephen Reece, Sharvil C. Desai, Michael E. Smith, Michael D. Dickey. 2013. Self-healing stretchable wires for reconfigurable circuit wiring and 3D microfluidics. Advanced Materials 25, 11 (2013), 15891592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Manero, R. B., J. Grewal, B. Michael, A. Shafti, K. Althoefer, J. Ll Fernandez, and M. J. Howard. "Wearable Embroidered Muscle Activity Sensing Device for the Human Upper Leg." arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.04841 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Standards for placing sensors for each muscle group: http://www.seniam.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. V. Postrel, "Why Nobody's Wearing Wearables," Bloomberg, March 3, 2016. Online: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-0303/why-nobody-s-wearing-wearablesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Repository for scoring and plotting contacts: https://github.com/harnettlab/iPythonNotebookRepo/tree/m aster/TobikoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Tobiko: A Contact Array for Self-Configuring, Surface-Powered Sensors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader