skip to main content
10.1145/3024969.3025009acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Popfab: A Case for Portable Digital Fabrication

Published:20 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a case study of Popfab, a portable multi-purpose digital fabrication tool. It is uses interchangeable heads (3D printer, CNC mill, and CNC knife) on a general-purpose motion platform that folds into a briefcase. Popfab contributed to the discussion of the future of digital fabrication tools by demonstrating the feasibility of both portability and both additive and subtractive manufacturing on a single platform. Portability is not yet a widely considered option for digital fabrication tools, but with Popfab we demonstrate that general site-specific personal fabrication is possible.

References

  1. Jennifer Jacobs and Amit Zoran. 2015. Hybrid Practice in the Kalahari: Design Collaboration through Digital Tools and Hunter-Gatherer Craft. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 619--628. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Manfred Lau, Greg Saul, Jun Mitani, and Takeo Igarashi. 2010. Modeling-in-context: User Design of Complementary Objects with a Single Photo. In Proceedings of the Seventh Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling Symposium (SBIM '10). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 17--24. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1923363.1923367 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marlin. 2016. Marlin Firmware. http://www.marlinfw.org/. (2016). accessed 2016-08-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Mellis, Sean Follmer, Björn Hartmann, Leah Buechley, and Mark D. Gross. 2013. FAB at CHI: Digital Fabrication Tools, Design, and Community. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3307--3310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ilan Moyer. 2012. Core XY. http://corexy.com/. (2012). accessed 2016-01-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Printrbot. 2016. Printrboard Rev. F6. https://printrbot.com/shop/printrboard-rev-f6. (2016). accessed 2016-08-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pronterface. 2016. Printrun. http://www.pronterface.com/. (2016). accessed 2016-08-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrew Quitmeyer and Hannah Perner-Wilson. 2015. Wearable studio practice: design considerations for digital crafting in harsh environments. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 1285--1293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Alec Rivers, Ilan E. Moyer, and Frédo Durand. 2012. Position-correcting Tools for 2D Digital Fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 4, Article 88 (July 2012), 7 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eldon Schoop, Michelle Nguyen, Daniel Lim, Valkyrie Savage, Sean Follmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2016. Drill Sergeant: Supporting Physical Construction Projects through an Ecosystem of Augmented Tools. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1607--1614. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Alexander H. Slocum. 1992. Design of three-groove kinematic couplings. Precision Engineering 14, 2 (1992), 67--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Alexander Teibrich, Stefanie Mueller, François Guimbretière, Robert Kovacs, Stefan Neubert, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Patching Physical Objects. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 83--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shopbot Tools. 2014. Handibot Kickstarter Page. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1320575205/ handibottm-a-smart-digital-power-tool. (2014). accessed 2016-07-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lung-Wen Tsai. 1999. Robot analysis: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Christian Weichel, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, and Hans Gellersen. 2015a. SPATA: Spatio-Tangible Tools for Fabrication-Aware Design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Christian Weichel, John Hardy, Jason Alexander, and Hans Gellersen. 2015b. ReForm: Integrating Physical and Digital Design Through Bidirectional Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Karl D.D. Willis, Cheng Xu, Kuan-Ju Wu, Golan Levin, and Mark D. Gross. 2011. Interactive Fabrication: New Interfaces for Digital Fabrication. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 69--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Amit Zoran and Joseph A. Paradiso. 2013. FreeD: A Freehand Digital Sculpting Tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2613--2616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Popfab: A Case for Portable Digital Fabrication

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '17: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
        March 2017
        806 pages
        ISBN:9781450346764
        DOI:10.1145/3024969

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        TEI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate41of151submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader