ABSTRACT
In this paper we present a preliminary design and initial assessment of a computational musical tabletop exhibit for children and teenagers at the Museum of Design Atlanta (MODA). We explore how participatory workshops can promote hands-on learning of computational concepts through making music. We also use a hands-on approach to assess informal learning based on maker interviews. Maker interviews serve to subjectively capture impromptu reflections of the visitors' achievements from casual interactions with the exhibit. Findings from our workshops and preliminary assessment indicate that experiencing and taking ownership of tangible programming on a musical tabletop is related to: ownership of failure, ownership through collaboration, ownership of the design, and ownership of code. Overall, this work suggests how to better support ownership of computational concepts in tangible programming, which can inform how to design self-learning experiences at the museum, and future trajectories between the museum and the school or home.
Supplemental Material
- Samuel Aaron and Alan F. Blackwell. 2013. From Sonic Pi to Overtone: Creative Musical Experiences with Domain-Specific and Functional Languages. In Proceedings of the First ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Functional Art, Music, Modeling & Design (FARM '13). 35--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sue Allen. 2004. Designs for Learning: Studying Science Museum Exhibits that Do More than Entertain. Science Education 88, Suppl. 1 (2004), S17--S33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alissa N. Antle. 2015. Scratching the Surface: Opportunities and Challenges from Designing Interactive Tabletops for Learning. In Learning Technologies and the Body: Integration and Implementation, Victor R. Lee (Ed.). Routledge (Taylor & Francis), 55--73.Google Scholar
- Alissa N. Antle, Jillian L. Warren, Aaron May, Min Fan, and Alyssa F. Wise. 2014. Emergent Dialogue: Eliciting Values During Children's Collaboration with a Tabletop Game for Change. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '14). 37--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeanne Bamberger. 1979. Logo Music Projects: Experiments in Musical Perception and Design. MA Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Ayah Bdeir. 2009. Electronics as Material: littleBits. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '09). 397--400. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tina Blaine and Tim Perkis. 2000. The Jam-O-Drum Interactive Music System: A Study in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '00). 165--173. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anders Bruun, Kenneth Eberhardt Jensen, Dianna Hjorth Kristensen, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2016. Escaping the Trough: Towards Real-World Impact of Tabletop Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2016), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Sarah D'Angelo, D. Harmon Pollock, and Michael Horn. 2015. Fishing with Friends: Using Tabletop Games to Raise Environmental Awareness in Aquariums. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '15). 29--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Dewey. 1938/1997. Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.Google Scholar
- Beverlie Dietze and Diane Kashin. 2012. Playing and Learning in Early Childhood Education. Pearson Canada.Google Scholar
- Pierre Dillenbourg and Michael Evans. 2011. Interactive Tabletops in Education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 4 (2011), 491--514.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth Dobson and Karen Littleton. 2016. Digital Technologies and the Mediation of Undergraduate Students' Collaborative Music Compositional Practices. Learning, Media and Technology 41, 2 (2016), 330--350.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carolyn Edwards, Lella Gandini, and George Forman (Eds.). 1993. The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Childhood Education. ERIC.Google Scholar
- Ylva Fernaeus and Jakob Tholander. 2006. Finding Design Qualities in a Tangible Programming Space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). 447--456. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason Freeman, Brian Magerko, Tom McKlin, Mike Reilly, Justin Permar, Cameron Summers, and Eric Fruchter. 2014. Engaging Underrepresented Groups in High School Introductory Computing through Computational Remixing with EarSketch. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '14). 85--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedrich Fröbel. 1885. The Education of Man. A. Lovell & Company, NY.Google Scholar
- Daniel Gallardo, Carles Fernández Julià, and Sergi Jordà. 2008. TurTan: A Tangible Programming Language for Creative Exploration. In 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP 2008). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 89--92.Google Scholar
- Mark Guzdial. 2003. A Media Computation Course for Non-Majors. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 35. 104--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amanda Harris, Jochen Rick, Victoria Bonnett, Nicola Yuill, Rowanne Fleck, Paul Marshall, and Yvonne Rogers. 2009. Around the Table: Are Multiple-Touch Surfaces Better than Single-Touch for Children's Collaborative Interactions?. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL '09). 335--344. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael S. Horn, Brenda C. Phillips, Evelyn Margaret Evans, Florian Block, Judy Diamond, and Chia Shen. 2016. Visualizing Biological Data in Museums: Visitor Learning With an Interactive Tree of Life Exhibit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53, 6 (2016), 895--918.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2008. Tangible Programming and Informal Science Learning: Making TUIs Work for Museums. In Proceedings of the 7th international Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '08). 194--201. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eva Hornecker. 2008. "I don't Understand it Either, but it is Cool" -- Visitor Interactions with a Multi-Touch Table in a Museum. In 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP 2008). 113--120.Google Scholar
- 2Toshio Iwai. 1999. Composition on the Table. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '99). 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carey Jewitt, Anna Xambó, and Sara Price. 2016. Exploring Methodological Innovation in the Social Sciences: The Body in Digital Environments and the Arts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology (2016), 1--16.Google Scholar
- 2Sergi Jordà. 2008. On Stage: The Reactable and Other Musical Tangibles Go Real. International Journal of Arts and Technology 1, 3/4 (2008), 268--287.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Kaltenbrunner and Ross Bencina. 2007. reacTIVision: A Computer-Vision Framework for Table-Based Tangible Interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '07). 69--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Larmer, John Mergendoller, and Suzie Boss. 2015. Setting the Standard for Project Based Learning. ASCD.Google Scholar
- John Maeda. 2013. STEM + Art = STEAM. The STEAM Journal 1, 1 (2013), 34.Google Scholar
- Anand Mahadevan, Jason Freeman, and Brian Magerko. 2016. An Interactive, Graphical Coding Environment for EarSketch Online using Blockly and Web Audio API. In Proceedings of the 2nd Web Audio Conference (WAC '16).Google Scholar
- Bill Manaris and Andrew R. Brown. 2015. Making Music with Computers: Creative Programming in Python. CRC Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ali Mazalek, Claudia Winegarden, Tristan Al-Haddad, Susan J. Robinson, and Chih-Sung Wu. 2009. Architales: Physical/Digital Co-design of an Interactive Story Table. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '09). 241--248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adam L. Meyers, Marilyn C. Cole, Evan Korth, and Sam Pluta. 2009. Musicomputation: Teaching Computer Science to Teenage Musicians. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (CC '09). 29--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sugata Mitra and Vivek Rana. 2001. Children and the Internet: Experiments with Minimally Invasive Education in India. British Journal of Educational Technology 32, 2 (2001), 221--232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Montessori. 1912. The Montessori Method. Frederick A. Stokes, NY.Google Scholar
- Reese Muntean, Kate Hennessy, Alyssa F. Wise, Susan Rowley, Jordan Wilson, Brendan Matkin, Rachael Eckersley, Perry Tan, and Ron Wakkary. 2015. Belongings: A Tangible Interface for Intangible Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2015). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Claire O'Malley and Danae Stanton Fraser. 2004. Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies.Google Scholar
- Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hayes Solos Raffie, Amanda J. Parkes, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2004. Topobo: A Constructive Assembly System with Kinetic Memory. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). 647--654. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Casey Reas and Ben Fry. 2007. Processing: A Programming Handbook for Visual Designers and Artists. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Reason and Hilary Bradbury-Huang. 2015. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE.Google Scholar
- Yvonne Rogers. 2011. Interaction Design Gone Wild: Striving for Wild Theory. Interactions 18, 4 (2011), 58--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gerard Roma and Perfecto Herrera. 2010. Graph Grammar Representation for Collaborative Sample-Based Music Creation. In Proceedings of the 5th Audio Mostly Conference: A Conference on Interaction with Sound (AM '10). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Ruthmann, Jesse M. Heines, Gena R. Greher, Paul Laidler, and Charles Saulters II. 2010. Teaching Computational Thinking Through Musical Live Coding in Scratch. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '10). 351--355. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. CRC Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Short. 2012. Teaching Scientific Concepts using a Virtual World--Minecraft. Teaching Science 58, 3 (2012), 55--58.Google Scholar
- Bret Victor. 2012. Learnable Programming. http://worrydream.com/LearnableProgramming/.Google Scholar
- Alyssa F. Wise, Alissa N. Antle, Jillian Warren, Aaron May, Min Fan, and Anna Macaranas. 2015. What Kind of World Do You Want to Live In? Positive Interdependence and Collaborative Processes in the Tangible Tabletop Land-Use Planning Game Youtopia. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL '15). ISLS Press.Google Scholar
- Chih-Sung Wu and Ali Mazalek. 2008. Tangible Tracking Table: An Interactive Tabletop Display. In IEEE Workshop on Tabletops and Interactive Surfaces (ITS '06), Vol. 8. 1--3.Google Scholar
- Anna Xambó, Eva Hornecker, Paul Marshall, Sergi Jordà, Chris Dobbyn, and Robin Laney. 2016. Exploring Social Interaction With a Tangible Music Interface. Interacting with Computers (2016).Google Scholar
- Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-Inspired Manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). 859--868. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Experience and Ownership with a Tangible Computational Music Installation for Informal Learning
Recommendations
Automatic music composition using answer set programming
Music composition used to be a pen and paper activity. These days music is often composed with the aid of computer software, even to the point where the computer composes parts of the score autonomously. The composition of most styles of music is ...
Armin: Automatic Trance Music Composition using Answer Set Programming
Latin American Workshop on Logic Languages, Algorithms and New Methods of Reasoning (LANMR)The Artificial Intelligence (AI) has taken a leading role in many activities which used to be made “by hand”; one of them is the musical composition. Such task now has another alternative implementation, through the support of software that can compose ...
Structure-Enhanced Pop Music Generation via Harmony-Aware Learning
MM '22: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on MultimediaPop music generation has always been an attractive topic for both musicians and scientists for a long time. However, automatically composing pop music with a satisfactory structure is still a challenging issue. In this paper, we propose to leverage ...
Comments