skip to main content
10.1145/3019943.3019997acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ICF based Usability Scale: evaluating usability according to the evaluators' perspective about the users' performance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ICF based Usability Scale (ICF-US) is a generic usability evaluation scale based on the conceptual model of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and consists of two subscales. This usability evaluation instrument is part of a comprehensive framework for the design, development and evaluation of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) products and services for older adults.

The ICF-US has been previously validated for self-perceived usability. The aims of the study reported in this paper were to verify if ICF-US is also suitable for usability evaluation of AAL products or services considering the opinion of the evaluators about the users.

The results indicate that the ICF-US can be useful tool for usability evaluation of AAL products or services based on the evaluators' perspective about the users' performance.

References

  1. Bangor, A., Kortum P. T. and Miller J. T. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24. 6, 574--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Broek, G., Cavallo F., Oddetti, L., and Wehrmann C. 2009. Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap, VDI/VDE-IT AALIANCE Office, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cockton, G. 2012. Usability Evaluation. In Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, Soegaard Rikke Friis, Ed. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Nubila H. B. V. and Buchalla C. M. 2008. O papel das Classificações da OMS - CID e CIF nas definições de deficiência e incapacidade. In Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 11.2, 324--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Federici, S., Meloni, F. and LoPresti, A. 2009. International Literature Review on WHODAS II. Life Span and Disability, 12.1, 83--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernández, L. K. 2010. Valoración geriátrica integral. In El Residente, 5.2, 55--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoppe, A. 2011. Technological Stress: Mental Strain of Younger and Older Users if Technology Fails. In Ambient Asssisted Living. Germany: Springer, 2011, 17--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jette, A. M. 2006. Toward a Common Language for Function, Disability, and Health. Physical Therapy, 86.5, 726--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lewis, J. R. 2002. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 14, 3--4 463--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Martins, A. I., Queirós, A., and Cerqueira M. 2013. Metodologia Living Usability Lab. In Teixeira, A. Queirós A. and Rocha N. P. (Eds.), Laboratório Vivo de Usabilidade 1st ed. Aveiro: Arc Publishing 215--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martins, A. I., Queirós, A., Rocha, N. P. and Santos, B. S. 2013. Usability evaluation: A systematic literature review {Avaliação de usabilidade: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura}. RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, 11.1, 31--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Martins, A. I., Rosa, A. F., Queirós, A., Silva, A. and Rocha, N. P. 2015. Definition and Validation of the ICF -- Usability Scale. Procedia Computer Science, 67, 132--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Moumtzi, V. and Wills, C. 2009. Utilizing Living Labs Approach for the Validation of Services for the Assisting Living of Elderly People. In 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Netto, M. P. and Ponte, J. 2000. Envelhecimento: desafio na transição do século. In Gerontologia -- A Velhice e o Envelhecimento em Visão Globalizada, 1st ed., M. P. Netto, Ed. São Paulo: Atheneu, 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nordenfelt, L. 2003. Action theory, disability and ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25.18, 1075--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ochoa, E. 2008. Persona - PERceptive Spaces prOmoting iNdependent Aging - Report Describing Values, Trends, User Needs and Guidelines for Service Characteristics in the AAL Persona Context, Bruxelas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Queirós, A., Alvarelhão, J., Amaro, A., Teixeira, A. and Rocha, N.P. 2011. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability of Health as a Conceptual Framework for the Design, Development and Evaluation of AAL Services for Older Adults. In Workshop AAL, 46--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Queirós, A., Carvalho, S., Pavão, J. and Rocha, N.P. 2013. AAL information based services and care integration. In HEALTHINF 2013 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics, 403--406.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Queirós, A., Cerqueira, M., Martins, A. I., Silva, A., Alvarelhão, J., Teixeira, A. and Rocha, N.P. 2014. ICF inspired personas to improve development for usability and accessibility in ambient assisted living. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 409--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Queirós, A., Silva, A., Alvarelhão, J., Rocha, N. P. and Teixeira A. 2015. Usability, accessibility and ambient-assisted living: a systematic literature review. In Universal Access in the Information Society, 14.1, 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Queirós, A., Silva, A.G., Alvarelhão, J., Teixeira, A. and Rocha, N.P. 2013. A conceptual framework for the design and development of AAL services. In Handbook of Research on ICTs for Human-Centered Healthcare and Social Care Services, 568--586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribeiro, V. S., Martins, A. I., Queirós, A., Silva, A. G. and Rocha N. P. 2014. AAL@ MEO: Interactive Digital-TV to Support Home Care In Studies in health technology and informatics, 217, 1024--1029.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Schneider, R., Marcolin, D. and Dalacorte R. 2008. Avaliação funcional de idosos. Scientia Medica, 18.1, 4--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Stucki, G., Reinhardt, J. D., Grimby, G., and Melvin, J. 2007. Developing 'Human Functioning and Rehabilitation Research' from the comprehensive perspective. In Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39.9, 665--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. UsabilityNet. 2003 Questionnaire resources. Online. Available: http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/r_questionnaire.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. World Health Organization. 1998. Growing older- Staying Well. Ageing and physical activity in everyday life, Geneve.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization. 1998. Health Promotion Glossary, Geneve.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. World Health Organization. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneve.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. World Health Organization. 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. A contribution of the World Health Organization to the second United Nations World Assembly on Aging, Geneve.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. World Medical Association. 1991. Declaration of Helsinki. In Law, medicine & health care: a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine, 19, 3-4, 264--265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DSAI '16: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion
    December 2016
    440 pages
    ISBN:9781450347488
    DOI:10.1145/3019943

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 December 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate17of23submissions,74%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader