skip to main content
10.1145/3015022.3015029acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesadcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Uncertainty in Rank-Biased Precision

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information retrieval metrics that provide uncertainty intervals when faced with unjudged documents, such as Rank-Biased Precision (RBP), provide us with an indication of the upper and lower bound of the system score. Unfortunately, the uncertainty is disregarded when examining the mean over a set of queries. In this article, we examine the distribution of the uncertainty per query and averaged over all queries, under the assumption that each unjudged document has the same probability of being relevant. We also derive equations for the mean, variance, and distribution of Mean RBP uncertainty. Finally, the impact of our assumption is assessed using simulation. We find that by removing the assumption of equal probability of relevance, we obtain a scaled form of the previously defined mean and standard deviation for the distribution of Mean RBP uncertainty.

References

  1. Chris Buckley and Ellen M Voorhees. Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information. In Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 25--32. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alistair Moffat and Justin Zobel. Rank-biased precision for measurement of retrieval effectiveness. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 27(1):2:1--2:27, December 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Laurence A. F. Park and Yuye Zhang. On the distribution of user persistence for rank-biased precision. In Proceedings of the 12th Australasian document computing symposium, pages 17--24, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kenneth T Wallenius. Biased sampling; the noncentral hypergeometric probability distribution. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yuye Zhang, Laurence A. F. Park, and Alistair Moffat. Click-based evidence for decaying weight distributions in search effectiveness metrics. Information Retrieval, 13(1):46--69, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Justin Zobel. How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments? In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 307--314. ACM, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ADCS '16: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Document Computing Symposium
    December 2016
    94 pages
    ISBN:9781450348652
    DOI:10.1145/3015022

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 December 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate30of57submissions,53%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader