skip to main content
10.1145/3001959.3001962acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A networked device for reproducing multisensory kissing

Published:16 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Kissing is a universal and essential interaction in human communication, yet we are not able to transmit and reproduce the multisensory sensations of kissing over digital communication networks. A networked kissing device is proposed to sense the lip pressure of users and to produce accurate force feedback to simulate kissing sensations. The system is designed to engage multiple sensory modalities during user interaction, including touch, smell, video and voice. This device can be used to augment digital communication by transmitting intimate touch sensations between human and human remotely, or between human and virtual agents.

References

  1. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM, 424--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shiseido Co. 2016. Rouge Rouge Kiss Me. (2016). https://rougerougekissme-shiseido.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kory Floyd, Justin P Boren, Annegret F Hannawa, Colin Hesse, Breanna McEwan, and Alice E Veksler. 2009. Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: Effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication 73, 2 (2009), 113--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Harry F Harlow. 1958. The nature of love. American psychologist 13, 12 (1958), 673.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fabian Hemmert, Ulrike Gollner, Matthias Lowe, Anne Wohlauf, and Gesche Joost. 2011. Intimate mobiles: grasping, kissing and whispering as a means of telecommunication in mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 21--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kathleen C Light, Karen M Grewen, and Janet A Amico. 2005. More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women. Biological psychology 69, 1 (2005), 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nobuhiro Takahashi, Yuki Kuniyasu, Michi Sato, Shogo Fukushima, Masahiro Furukawa, Yuki Hashimoto, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2011. A remote haptic communication device that evokes a feeling of kiss. Interaction 2 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A networked device for reproducing multisensory kissing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MVAR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on Multimodal Virtual and Augmented Reality
      November 2016
      44 pages
      ISBN:9781450345590
      DOI:10.1145/3001959

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MVAR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate9of14submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate9of14submissions,64%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader