skip to main content
10.1145/2959100.2959152acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Vista: A Visually, Socially, and Temporally-aware Model for Artistic Recommendation

Published:07 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Understanding users' interactions with highly subjective content---like artistic images---is challenging due to the complex semantics that guide our preferences. On the one hand one has to overcome `standard' recommender systems challenges, such as dealing with large, sparse, and long-tailed datasets. On the other, several new challenges present themselves, such as the need to model content in terms of its visual appearance, or even social dynamics, such as a preference toward a particular artist that is independent of the art they create. In this paper we build large-scale recommender systems to model the dynamics of a vibrant digital art community, Behance, consisting of tens of millions of interactions (clicks and 'appreciates') of users toward digital art. Methodologically, our main contributions are to model (a) rich content, especially in terms of its visual appearance; (b) temporal dynamics, in terms of how users prefer 'visually consistent' content within and across sessions; and (c) social dynamics, in terms of how users exhibit preferences both towards certain art styles, as well as the artists themselves.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p309.mp4

mp4

1 GB

References

  1. D. W. Aha, D. Kibler, and M. K. Albert. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine learning, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. J. Chaney, D. M. Blei, and T. Eliassi-Rad. A probabilistic model for using social networks in personalized item recommendation. In RecSys, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Chen, J. L. Moore, D. Turnbull, and T. Joachims. Playlist prediction via metric embedding. In SIGKDD, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Chen, J. Xu, and T. Joachims. Multi-space probabilistic sequence modeling. In SIGKDD, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Ding and X. Li. Time weight collaborative filtering. In CIKM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Feng, X. Li, Y. Zeng, G. Cong, Y. M. Chee, and Q. Yuan. Personalized ranking metric embedding for next new poi recommendation. In IJCAI, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Guo, J. Zhang, and N. Yorke-Smith. Trustsvd: Collaborative filtering with both the explicit and implicit influence of user trust and of item ratings. In AAA, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. He, C. Lin, J. Wang, and J. McAuley. Sherlock: sparse hierarchical embeddings for visually-aware one-class collaborative filtering. In IJCAI, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. He and J. McAuley. Ups and downs: Modeling the visual evolution of fashion trends with one-class collaborative filtering. In WWW, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. He and J. McAuley. VBPR: visual bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In AAAI, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Kalantidis, L. Kennedy, and L.-J. Li. Getting the look: clothing recognition and segmentation for automatic product suggestions in everyday photos. In ICMR, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Klinkenberg. Learning drifting concepts: Example selection vs. example weighting. Intelligent Data Analysis, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In SIGKDD, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Communications of the ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Koren and R. Bell. Advances in collaborative filtering. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. H. Ma, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Learning to recommend with social trust ensemble. In SIGIR, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Ma, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Sorec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In CIKM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Mobasher, H. Dai, T. Luo, and M. Nakagawa. Using sequential and non-sequential patterns in predictive web usage mining tasks. In ICDM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. Niu, B. Recht, C. Ré, and S. J. Wright. Hogwild: A lock-free approach to parallelizing stochastic gradient descent. In NIPS, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. BPR: bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In UAI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Factorizing personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Shani, R. I. Brafman, and D. Heckerman. An mdp-based recommender system. In UAI, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. L. van der Maaten. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. JMLR, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Wang, W. Fan, P. S. Yu, and J. Han. Mining concept-drifting data streams using ensemble classifiers. In SIGKDD, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K. Yamaguchi, M. Kiapour, and T. Berg. Paper doll parsing: Retrieving similar styles to parse clothing items. In ICCV, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. W. Yang, P. Luo, and L. Lin. Clothing co-parsing by joint image segmentation and labeling. In CVPR, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. T. Zhao, J. McAuley, and I. King. Leveraging social connections to improve personalized ranking for collaborative filtering. In CIKM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Zimdars, D. M. Chickering, and C. Meek. Using temporal data for making recommendations. In UAI, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Vista: A Visually, Socially, and Temporally-aware Model for Artistic Recommendation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            RecSys '16: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
            September 2016
            490 pages
            ISBN:9781450340359
            DOI:10.1145/2959100

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 September 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            RecSys '16 Paper Acceptance Rate29of159submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

            Upcoming Conference

            RecSys '24
            18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
            October 14 - 18, 2024
            Bari , Italy

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader