J. Gelernter
- Sunitha Abburu. 2012. A survey on ontology reasoners and comparison. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 57, 17, 33--39.Google Scholar
- Abderrazak Bachir Bouiadjra and Sidi-Mohamed Benslimane. 2011. FOEval: Full ontology evaluation: model and perspectives. 7th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (NLPKE 2011, Tokushima, Japan, November 27-29), 464--468.Google Scholar
- Montserrat Batet and Dominick Sanchez. 2014. A semantic approach for ontology evaluation. 2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. 138--145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janez Brank, Marko Grobelnik, and Dunja Mladenic. 2007. Automatic evaluation of ontologies. Natural Language Processing and Text Mining, A. Kao and S. R. Poteet (Eds.). 193--219. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Arpinar Budak, Karthikeyan Giriloganathan, and Aleman-Meza Boanerges. 2006. Ontology quality by detection of conflicts in metadata. Proceedings of the 4th International EON Workshop, May 22nd, 2006, Edinburgh, UK, [7 p.].Google Scholar
- Oscar Corcho, Gómez-Pérez Asuncion, Rafael González-Cabero, and M. Carmen Suárez-Figueroa. 2004. ODEval: A tool for evaluating RDF(s), DAML+OIL, and OWL concept taxonomies. Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations IFIP International Federation for Information Processing Volume 154, 2004, 369--382.Google Scholar
- Antonio De Nicola and Michele Missikoff. 2016. A lightweight methodology for rapid ontology engineering. Commun. ACM 59, 3, 79--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aldo Gangemi, Carola Catenacci, Massimiliano Ciaramita, and Jos Lehmann. 2006. Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4011. 140--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Gruninger and Mark. S. Fox. 1995. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1--10. http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/enterprise-modelling/papers/gruninger-ijcai95.pdf.Google Scholar
- Jens Hartmann, et al. 2005. D1.2.3 Methods for ontology evaluation [49 p.] http://knowledgeweb.semanticweb.org/semanticportal/deliverables/D1.2.3.pdf.Google Scholar
- Matthew Horridge, Tania Tudorache, Jennifer Vendetti, Csongor Nyulas, Mark A. Musen, and Natala F. Noy. 2013. Simplified OWL editing for the web: Is WebProtégé enough? http://web.stanford.edu/∼natalya/papers/iswc2013_webprotege.pdf. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Lee, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Bijan Parsia, and Uli Sattler. 2015. A survey of current stand-alone OWL reasoners. Fourth OWL Reasoners Evalution Workshop, July 2015, 68--79.Google Scholar
- Nicolas Matentzoglu, Jared Leo, Valentino Hudhra, Bijan Parsia, and Uli Sattler. 2015. A survey of current, stand-alone OWL reasoners. Fourth OWL Reasoner Evaluation Workshop, July 2015, 68--79Google Scholar
- Fabian Neuhaus. 2015. Scenario-based ontology evaluation (SCONE): User Guide. [14 p.]Google Scholar
- Fabian Neuhaus, Amanda Vizedom (main editors), et al. 2013. Towards ontology evaluation across the life cycle: The Communique of the ontology summit 2013. Appl. Ontol. 8 (2013) 179--194. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leo Obrst, B. Ashpole, Werner Ceusters, Inderjeet Mani, Steve Ray, and Barry Smith. 2007. The evaluation of ontologies: Toward improved semantic interoperability. Semantic Web, chapter 7, 139--158. Springer.Google Scholar
- Victoria Pammer, Peter Scheir, and Stefanie Lindstaedt. 2006. Ontology coverage check: Support for evaluation in ontology engineering. [12 p.] from http://www.know-center.tugraz.at/download_extern/papers/fomi2006_camera_ready_version_november_2006.pdf.Google Scholar
- Robert Porzel and Rainer Malaka. 2004. A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. In Proc. ECAI 2004 Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population. A Workshop at the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Aug 22-23, 2004, Valencia, Spain. [6 p.]Google Scholar
- Maria Poveda-Villalon, Mari Carmen Suarez-Figueroa, and A. Gomez-Perez. 2010. A double classification of common pitfalls in ontologies. Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Quality (OntoQual 2010), (October 15, 2010).Google Scholar
- Jeniffer D. Warrender and Philip Lord, 2015. How, what and why to test an ontology. arXiv:1505.04112 [cs.AI].Google Scholar
- Zhijun Zhang and John A. Miller. 2005. Ontology query languages. http://cobweb.cs.uga.edu/∼jam/home/theses/zhijun_thesis/final/zzms1.pdf.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Challenges in Ontology Evaluation
Recommendations
A Visual Ontology Management System for Handling, Integrating and Enriching Semantic Repositories
INCOS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative SystemsThis paper presents a prototype system for managing ontological data from RDF semantic repositories, via an intuitive, graph-based visual interface. The core of the system provides basic editing functionalities for the managed ontologies, while at the ...
User-Friendly Ontology Editing and Visualization Tools: The OWLeasyViz Approach
IV '09: Proceedings of the 2009 13th International Conference Information VisualisationThis paper aims to propose solutions to the issue of ontology visualization, by presenting intuitive and user-friendly ontology editing and visualization environments mainly oriented to domain experts. It starts with an overview of existing ontology ...
OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An On-line Tool for Ontology Evaluation
This paper presents two contributions to the field of Ontology Evaluation. First, a live catalogue of pitfalls that extends previous works on modeling errors with new pitfalls resulting from an empirical analysis of over 693 ontologies. Such a catalogue ...
Comments