skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858322acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"This is how I want to learn": High Functioning Autistic Teens Co-Designing a Serious Game

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a project that developed a Serious Game with a Natural User Interface, via a Participatory Design approach with two adolescents with High-Functioning Autism (HFA). The project took place in a highly specialized school for young people with Special Educational Needs (SEN). The teenagers were empowered by assigning them specific roles across several sessions. They could express their voice as user, informant, designer and tester. As a result, teachers and young people developed a digital educational game based on their experience as video gamers to improve academic skills in Geography. This paper contributes by describing the sensitive and flexible approach to the design process which promoted stakeholders' participation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: AuthorGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baio J. (2014) Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years--Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, USA, 2010 Surveillance Summaries. March 28, 2014 / 63(SS02);1--21. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6302a1.htm?s_cid=ss6302a1_wGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoli L., Corradi C., Garzotto F., Valoriani M. (2013). Exploring Motion-based Touchless Games for Autistic Children's Learning. In Proc. of IDC'13, pp.102--111 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benton L., Johnson H., Ashwin E., Brosnan M., Grawemeyer B. (2012). Developing IDEAS: Supporting children with autism within a participatory design team. In Proc. of CHI'12, pp. 2599--2608 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Benton L., Johnson H. (2014). Structured approaches to participatory design for children: can targeting the needs of children with autism provide benefits for a broader child population? Journal of Instructional Science, 42, pp. 47--65Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Benton, L. & Johnson, H. (2015). Widening participation in technology design: a review of the involvement of children with special educational needs and disabilities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 3--4, 23--40Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bernardini S., Porayska-Pomsta K., Smith T.J. (2014). ECHOES: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism. Journal of Information Sciences, 264, pp. 41--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bianchi-Berthouze N., Kim W., Patel D. (2007). Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? And Why? Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pp. 102--113. Springer Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bossavit B., Marzo A., Ardaiz O. and Pina A. (2014). Hierarchical Menu Selection with a Body-Centered Remote Interface. Journal of Interacting with Computers, 26(5), pp. 389--402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bossavit B., Pina, A. (2014). Designing educational tools, based on body interaction, for children with special needs who present different motor skills. In Proc. of iTAG'14, pp. 63--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bratteteig T., Wagner I. (2012). Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. Participatory Design Conference Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Davis M., Dautenhahn K., Powell S., Nehaniv C. (2010). Guidelines for researchers and practitioners designing software and software trials for children with autism. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 4(1), 38--48Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Druin A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and IT, 21(1), pp. 1--25Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Frauenberger C., Good J., Keay-Bright W., Pain H. (2012). Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. In Proc. of CHI '12, pp. 2377--2386 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Frauenberger C., Good J., Alcorn A., Pain H. (2013). Conversing through and about technologies: Design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research(er) perspectives. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1(2), 38--49Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Frauenberger C., Good J., Fitzpatrick G., Iversen O.S. (2015) In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design, International journal of Human.Computer. Studies. 74, pp. 93--106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Guha M.L., Druin A., Fails J. (2008). Designing With and for Children With Special Needs: an Inclusionary Model. In Proc. of IDC'08, pp 61--64 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Guha M.L., Druin A., Fails J.A. (2013). Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1(1), pp. 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Harrison, S., Sengers, P., & Tatar, D. (2011). Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 385--392 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeifer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Knight V., McKissick B.R., Saunders A. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), pp. 2628--2648Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kynigos C., Smyrnaiou Z., Roussou M. (2010). Exploring rules and underlying concepts while engaged with collaborative full-body games. In Proc. of IDC'10, pp. 222--225 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Latham S.O., Stockman I.J. (2014). Effect of Augmented Sensorimotor Input on Learning Verbal and Nonverbal Tasks Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 44(6), 1288--1302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lavelle T. A., Weinstein M. C., Newhouse J. P., Munir K., Kuhlthau K. A., Prosser L. A. (2014). Economic burden of childhood autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 133(3), 520--529Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Microsoft Kinect. https://dev.windows.com/enus/kinect. {Accessed on January 2016}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Millen L., Cobb S., Patel H. (2011). Participatory design approach with children with autism. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10(4), 289--294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Molins-Ruano P., Sevilla C., Santini S., Haya P.A., Rodríguez P., Sacha G.M. (2014). Designing video games to improve students' motivation. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 31, pp. 571--579 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Montes G., Halterman J. S. (2008). Association of childhood autism spectrum disorders and loss of family income. Pediatrics, 121(4), e821-e826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Muller M.J. (2003). chapter Participatory Design: The third Space in HCI. The Human-Computer Interaction Hand- book, pp. 1051--1068. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, UK Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Neale H., Cobb S., Kerr S. (2003). An inclusive design toolbox for development of educational Virtual Environments. Presented at: Include2003, Royal College of Art, London, 25--28 March 2003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Parsons S., Charman T., Faulkner R., Ragan J., Wallace S., Wittemeyer K. (2013). Commentary--bridging the research and practice gap in autism: The importance of creating research partnerships with schools. Journal of Autism, 17(3), pp.268--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Parsons S., Cobb S. (2014). Reflections on the role of the "users": challenges in a multi-disciplinary context of learner-centered design for children on the autism spectrum. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(4), 421--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Pennington, R. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(4), pp. 239--248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Porayska-Pomsta (2015) Processes contra outcomes: On the uncomfortable search for balance between inclusive participation, design and engineering. Presentation at the ESRC seminar series: Innovative technologies for autism-critical reflections on digital bubbles. University of Bath, 9th July 2015. http://digitalbubbles.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/DigitalBubbleBathfinal.compressed.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruland C.M., Starren J., Vatne T.M. (2008). Participatory design with children in the development of a support system for patient-centered care in pediatric oncology, Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 41(4), pp. 624--635 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Saiano M., Pellegrino L., Casadio M., Summa S., Garbarino E., Rossi V., Dall-Agata D., Sanguineti V. (2015). Natural interfaces and virtual environments for the acquisition of street crossing and path following skills in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders: a feasibility study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 12Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wass S.V., Porayska-Pomsta K. (2014) The uses of cognitive training technologies in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders Autism, 18(8), 851--871Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Whyte E.M., Smyth J.M., Scherf K.S. (2014). Designing Serious Game Interventions for Individuals with Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Wrzesien M., Raya M.A. (2010) Learning in serious virtual worlds: evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the E-Junior project. Computers & Education 55, pp. 178--187 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "This is how I want to learn": High Functioning Autistic Teens Co-Designing a Serious Game

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader