skip to main content
10.1145/285237.285258acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 1998Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of applications that must reliably distribute bulk data to a large number of autonomous clients motivates the design of new multicast and broadcast protocols. We describe an ideal, fully scalable protocol for these applications that we call a digital fountain. A digital fountain allows any number of heterogeneous clients to acquire bulk data with optimal efficiency at times of their choosing. Moreover, no feedback channels are needed to ensure reliable delivery, even in the face of high loss rates.We develop a protocol that closely approximates a digital fountain using a new class of erasure codes that for large block sizes are orders of magnitude faster than standard erasure codes. We provide performance measurements that demonstrate the feasibility of our approach and discuss the design, implementation and performance of an experimental system.

References

  1. 1.S. Acharya, M. Franklin, and S. Zdonik, "Dissemination Based Data Delivery Using Broadcast Disks," IEEE Personal Communications, December 1995, pp. 50-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.A. Bestavros. "AIDA-based real-time fault-tolerant broadcast disks." In Procedings o/the 16th IEEE Real- Time System Symposium, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.S. Bhattacharyya, J. F. Kurose, D. Towsley, and R. Nagarajan, "Efficient Rate-Controlled Bulk Data Transfer using Multiple Multicast Groups", In Proc. of INFO- COM '98, San Francisco, April 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4..I. B15mer, M. Kalfane, M. Karpinski, R. Karp, M. Luby, and D. Zuckerman, "An XOR-Based Erasure- Resilient Coding Scheme," ICSI Technical Report No. TR-95-O~i8, August 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.S. Floyd, V. Jacobson, C. G. Liu, S. McCanne, and L. Zhang, "A Rehable Multicast Framework for Light- Weight Sessions and Apphcation Level Framing." In ACM SIGCOMM '95, pp. 342-356, August 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.J. Gemmell, "ECSRM- Erasure Correcting Scalable Reliable Multicast," Microsoft Research Technical Report MS- TR-97-20, June 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.C. Huitema, "The Case for Packet Level FEC.' In Proc. o/IFIP 5th Int'l Workshop on Protocols/or High Speed Networks, Sophia Antipolis, France, October 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Cauchy-based Reed-Solomon codes. Available at http://~w~, icsi. berkeley, edu/~ luby.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.V. Jacobson, "pathchar", available at ht tp://www-mrg, ee. lbl. gov/pathchar.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.J. C. Lin and S. Paul, "RMTP: A Reliable Multicast Transport Protocol." In iEEE INFOCOM '96, pp. 1414-1424, March 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.M. Luby, M. Mitzenmacher, A. Shokrollahi, D. Spielman, and V. Stemann, "Practical Loss-Resilient Codes." In Proceedings o/the 29th A CM Symposium on Theory o/Computing, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.M. Luby, M. Mitzenmacher, and A. Shokrollahi, "Analysis of Random Processes via And-Or Tree Evaluation." In Proceedings o/the 9th Annual A CM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, January 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.N. F. Maxemchuk, Dispersity Routing in Store and Forward Networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, May 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.N. F. Maxemchuk, "Dispersity Routing." Proceedings of ICC '75, San Francisco, CA, pp. 41-10- 41-13, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.S. McCanne, V. Jacobson, and M. Vetterli, "Receiverdriven Layered Multicast." in Proc. o/ A CM SIG- COMM '96, pp. 117-130, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.C. K. Miller, "Reliable Multicast Protocols: A Practical View." In Proc. o/the ~~nd Annual Con/erence on Local Computer Networks (LCN '97), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.J. Nonnenmacher and E. W. Biersack, "Reliable Multicast: Where to Use Forward Error Correction." In Proc. o/IFIP 5th Int'l Workshop on Protocols/or High Speed Networks, pp. 134-148, Sophia Antipolis, France, October 1996. Chapman and Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.J. Nonnenmacher and E.W. Biersack, "Asynchronous Multicast Push: AMP." In Proc. o/International Conference on Computer Communications, Cannes, France, November 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.J. Nonnenmacher, M. Lacher, M. Jung, G. Carl, and E.W. Biersack, "How Bad is Reliable Multicast Without Local Recovery?" In Proc. o/iNFOCOM '98, San Francisco, April 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.J. Nonnenmacher, E. W. Biersack, and D. Towsley, "Parity-Based Loss Recovery for Reliable Multicast Transmission." In Proc. o/ACM SIGCOMM '97, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.M. O. Rabin, "Efficient Dispersal of Information for Security, Load Balancing, and Fault Tolerance." In Journal o/the A CM, Volume 38, pp. 335-348, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.L. Rizzo, "Effective Erasure Codes for Reliable Computer Communication Protocols." In Computer Communication Review, April 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.L. Rizzo and L. Vicisano, "A Reliable Multicast data Distribution Protocol Based on Software FEC Techniques.'' In Proc. of HPCS '97, Greece, June 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.E. Schooler and J. Gemmell, "Using multicast FEC to solve the midnight madness problem," Microsoft Research Technical Report MS-TR-97-~5, September 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.L. Vicisano, L. Rizzo, and J. Crowcroft. "TCP-like congestion control for layered multicast data transfer." in Proc. of INFOCOM '98, San Francisco, April 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.M. Yajnik, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley, "Packet Loss Correlation in the MBone Multicast Network." In Proceedings of IEEE Global Internet '96, London, November 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.R. Yavatkar, J. Griffoen and M. Sudan, "A Reliable Dis~ semination Protocol for Interactive Collaborative Applications.'' in Proceedings of A CM Multimedia '95, San Francisco, 1995, pp. 333-344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGCOMM '98: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '98 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
            October 1998
            328 pages
            ISBN:1581130031
            DOI:10.1145/285237

            Copyright © 1998 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 October 1998

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGCOMM '98 Paper Acceptance Rate26of247submissions,11%Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader