skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2819999acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for Those who are Overlooked: Insider Perspectives on Care Practices and Cooperative Work of Elderly Informal Caregivers

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper focuses on the complex and intimate setting of domestic home care. The majority of care for chronically ill people is realized by non-professionals, the relatives, who are often overlooked. Many of these informal caregivers are also elderly and face multiple, seriously demanding challenges in the context of informal care 24/7. In order to support this increasing user group, their cooperative work and coordination adequately, it is essential to gain a better understanding of their care practices and needs. This paper is based on ethnography in ten households in Germany. It combines data from the analysis of participant observations over eight months, interviews and cultural probes. Besides detailed descriptions of two cases, the central features of informal care experience and implications for design are discussed: the self-concept of the caregivers as being care experts, the need for social support, timing issues and coordination with other actors in this field.

References

  1. Gregory Abowd, Gillian R. Hayes, Julie A. Kientz, Lena Mamykina, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2006. Challenges and Opportunities for Collaboration Technologies for Chronic Care Management. The Human Computer Interaction Consortium HCIC 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stinne A. Ballegaard, Thomas R. Hansen, and Moten Kyng. 2008. Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life. In Proceedings CHI 2008, ACM Press, 1807-1816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Susanne Bødker, Erik Grönvall. 2013. Calendars: time coordination and overview in families and beyond. In ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Springer, London, UK, 63-81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Claus Bossen, Lars Rune Christensen, Erik Grönvall, and Lasse Vestergaard. 2013. CareCoor: Augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. International journal of medical informatics, 82, 5: e189-e199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2013. Moving healthcare to the home: the work to make homecare work. ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London, UK, 143-162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lynda C. Burton, Bozena Zdaniuk, Richard Schulz, Sharon Jackson, and Calvin Hirsch. 2003. Transitions in Spousal Caregiving. The Gerontologist 43, 2: 230-241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Yunan Chen, Victor Ngo, and Sun Young Park. 2013. Caring for caregivers: designing for integrality. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13, ACM Press, 91-102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lars Rune Christensen and Erik Groenvall. 2011. Challenges and Opportunities for Collaborative Technologies for Home Care Work. In ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on CSCW, Springer, London, UK, 61-80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Elizabeth C. Clipp and Linda K. George. 1990. Caregiver Needs and Patterns of Social Support. Journal of Gerontology 45, 3: S102-S111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Juliet C. Corbin and Anselm L. Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Andy Crabtree, Terry Hemmings, Tom Rodden, Keith Cheverst, Karen Clarke, Guy Dewsbury, John Hughes, and Mark Rouncefield. 2003. Designing with Care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. Proceedings of the Australian ComputerHuman Interaction Special Interest Group {OzCHI 2003}, 4-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. CMS.gov. National Health Expenditure Projections 2012-2022. http://www.cms.gov/Research-StatisticsData-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-andReports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/proj201 2.pdf. Accessed September 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sunny Consolvo, Peter Roessler, Brett E. Shelton, Anthony LaMarca, Bill Schilit, and Sara Bly. 2004. Technology for care networks of elders. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3, 2: 22-29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. John F. Deeken, Kathryn L. Taylor, Patricia Mangan, K. Robin Yabroff, and Jane M. Ingham. 2003. Care for the caregivers: a review of self-report instruments developed to measure the burden, needs, and quality of life of informal caregivers. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 26, 4: 922-953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. George Demiris. 2009. Independence and shared decision making: The role of smart home technology in empowering older adults. Conference Proceedings of the International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009, 6432-6436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Andrea Docherty, Alastair Owens, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Roland Petchey, Jacky Williams, and Yvonne H. Carter. 2008. Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review. Palliative Medicine 22, 2: 153-171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jordan Eschler, Logan Kendall, Kathleen O'Leary, Lisa M. Vizer, Paula Lozano, Jennifer B. McClure, Wanda Pratt, and James D. Ralston. 2015. Shared Calendars for Home Health Management. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1277-1288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Federal Ministry for Family, Elderly, Women and Youth. 2010. Ageing is changing. Central Results of the German Survey on Ageing. 2010. Download at http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Broschuerenst elle/Pdf-Anlagen/Altern-imWandel,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=t rue.pdf. (as in May 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Federal Statistical Office for Germany. Care Statistics. Care in the Context of Care Insurance. 2013. Download at http://www.statistik-portal.de/StatistikPortal/pflegestatistik_kreisvergleich.pdf (as in August 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Geraldine Fitzpatrick and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2012. Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 4-6: 609-665. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Uwe Flick. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. (4th ed.), Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonathan Gabe, Michael Bury, and Mary Ann Elston. 2004. Key Concepts in Medical Sociology. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. William Gaver, Peter Wright, Andrew Boucher, John Bowers, Mark Blythe, Nadine Jarvis, David Cameron, Tobie Kerridge, Alex Wilkie, Robert Phillips, and Peter Wright. 2011. The photostroller: supporting diverse care home residents in engaging with the world. In Proceedings CHI 2011, ACM Press, 1757-1766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. William Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural Probes and the Value of Uncertainty. Interactions 11, 5: 53-56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Linda K. George, Lisa P. Gwyther. 1986. Caregiver well-being: a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. The Gerontologist 26, 253-259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1965. Awareness of Dying. Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Barnes G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Erving Goffman. 1961a. Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Anchor Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Erving Goffman. 1961b. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, Bobbs-Merrill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Erving Goffman. 1963. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rachael Gooberman-Hill and Shah Ebrahim. 2006. Informal Care At Times Of Change In Health And Mobility: A Qualitative Study. Age And Ageing 35, 3: 261-266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Trisha Greenhalgh, Henry W. W. Potts, Geoff Wong, Pippa Bark, Deborah Swinglehurst. 2009. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quarterly 87, 4: 729-788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Karen Hooker, Deborah J. Monahan, Sally R. Bowman, Leslie D. Frazier, and Kim Shifren. 1998. Personality Counts for a Lot: Predictors of Mental and Physical Health of Spouse Caregivers in Two Disease Groups. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 53B, 2: P73-P85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Tejinder K. Judge, Carman Neustaedter, and Andrew F. Kurtz. 2010. The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space. In Proceedings CHI 2010, ACM Press, 2361-2370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Bonnie Kaplan and Kimberley D. Harris-Salamone. 2009. Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16, 3: 291299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Tapio Kirsi, Antti Hervonen, and Marja Jylhä. 2000. A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do: Husbands as caregivers to their demented wives: a discourse analytic approach. Journal of Aging Studies 14, 2: 153-169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Tapio Kirsi, Antti Hervonen, and Marja Jylhä. 2004. Always One Step Behind: Husbands' Narratives about Taking Care of their Demented Wives. Health 8, 2: 159181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Paula Klemm, Evelyn R. Hayes, Cynthia A. Diefenbeck, and Barry Milcarek. 2014. Online Support for Employed Informal Caregivers: Psychosocial Outcomes. Computers Informatics Nursing 32, 1: 10-20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Anna Kristenssen Eckwall, Bengt Sivberg, and Ingallil Rahm Hallberg. 2007. Older Caregivers' Coping Strategies and Sense of Coherence in Relation to Quality of Life. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57: 6 NO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas Lehnert, Dirk Heider, Hanna Leicht, Sven Heinrich, Sandro Corrieri, Melanie Luppa, Steffi RiedelHeller, and Hans-Helmut König. 2011. Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Medical Care Research and Review 68, 4: 387-420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth Mynatt, Patricia Davidson, and Daniel Greenblatt. 2008. MAHI: investigation of social scaffolding for reflective thinking in diabetes management. In Proceedings CHI 2008, ACM Press, 477-486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. John A. Mariani, Andy Crabtree, Terry Hemmings, and Tom Rodden. 2003. Informing the development of calendar systems for domestic use. In Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 119138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Robert K. Merton. 1957. The role-set. Problems in Social Theory. British Journal of Sociology 8, 2: 106120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Johanna Meurer, Martin Stein, David Randall, Markus Rhode, and Volker Wulf. 2014. Social dependency and mobile autonomy – Supporting older adults' mobility with ridesharing ICT. In Proceedings CHI 2014, ACM Press, 1923-1932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Margaret Morris, Jay Lundell, Eric Dishman, and Brad Needham. 2003. New perspectives on ubiquitous computing from ethnographic study of elders with cognitive decline. In UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 227-242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Claudia Müller, Dominik Hornung, Theodor Hamm, and Volker Wulf. 2015. Practice-based Design of a Neighborhood Portal: Focusing on Elderly Tenants in a City Quarter Living Lab. In Proceedings CHI 2015, ACM Press, 2295-2304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Claudia Müller, Cornelius Neufeldt, David Randall, and Volker Wulf. 2012. ICT-development in residential care settings: Sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home. In Proceedings of CHI 2012, ACM Press, 2639-2648. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Jim Rowan, Sarah Craighill, and Annie Jacobs. 2001. Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press, 333-340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Maryam Navaie-Waliser, Penny H. Feldman, David A. Gould, Carol Levine, Alexis N. Kuerbis, and Karen Donelan. 2002. When the Caregiver Needs Care: the Plight of Vulnerable Caregivers. American Journal of Public Health 92, 409-413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Carman Neustaedter, A. J. Bernheim Brush, and Saul Greenberg. 2009. The calendar is crucial: Coordination and awareness through the family calendar. ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction (TOCHI), 16, 1: 1-48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Leysia Palen, and Stinne Aaløkke. 2006. Of pill boxes and piano benches: 'home-made' methods for managing medication. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM Press, 79-88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Carolyn E. Pang, Carman Neustaedter, Bernhard E. Riecke, Erick Oduor, and Serena Hillman. 2013. Technology preferences and routines for sharing health information during the treatment of a chronic illness. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press, 1759-1768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Alexandra Petrakou. 2007. Exploring cooperation through a binder: a context for IT tools in elderly care at home. ECSCW 2007: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London, UK, 271-290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Susan Pickard, and Caroline Glendinning. 2002. Comparing and contrasting the role of family carers and nurses in the domestic health care of frail older people. Health & Social Care in the Community 10, 144-150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Wanda Pratt, Kenton Unruh, Andrea Civan, and Meredith M. Skeels. 2006. Personal health information management. Communications of the ACM 49, 1, 51-55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Dave Randall, Richard Harper, and Mark Rouncefield. 2007. Fieldwork for Design. Theory and Practice. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Dirk Sauerland, Ansgar Wübker, Sandra M. G. Zwakhalen, et al. 2014. Costs of Care for People with Dementia Just Before and After Nursing Home Placement. Primary Data From Eight European Countries. In Proc. of 10th World Congress on Health Economies in the Age of Longevity, Dublin, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Richard Schulz and Scott R. Beach. 1999. Caregiving as a Risk Factor for Mortality: The Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA. The Journal of the American Medical Association 282, 23: 2215-2219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Lucy Suchman. 1995. Making Work Visible. Communications of the ACM 38, 9: 56-64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Hilda TelliočYlu, Myriam Lewkowicz, Aparecido Fabiano Pinatti De Carvalho, Ivan BreÅ¡ković, Marén Schorch. 2014. Collaboration and Coordination in the Context of Informal Care (CCCiC). In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM Press, 339-342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. United Nations. Statement submitted by the international federation on ageing. 14 November 2013. http://documents-ddsny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N13/564/41/pdf/N135644 1.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed September 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Stephen Uzor and Lynne Baillie. 2013. Exploring & designing tools to enhance falls rehabilitation in the home. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press, 1233-1242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Job Van Exel, Gjalt De Graaf, and Werner Brouwer. 2008. Give me a Break! Informal Caregiver Attitude towards Respite Care. Health Policy 88, 1: 73-87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Michelle Van Ruyn, Sarah Sanders, Katharine Kahn, Courtney van Houtven, Joan Griffin, Sean Phelan, Michelle Martin, Audie Atienza, Deborah Finstad, and Julie Rowland. 2011. Objective Burden, Resources and Other Stressors Among Informal Cancer Caregivers: a hidden quality issue. Psychooncology 20, 1: 44-52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. John Vines, Mark Blythe, Stephen Lindsay, Paul Dunphy, Andrew Monk, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press, 1169-1178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Lin Wan, Claudia Mueller, Volker Wulf, and Dave Randall. 2014. Addressing the Subtleties in Dementia Care: Pre-study & Evaluation of a GPS Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems – CHI 2014, ACM Press, 3987-3996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles, Debra P. Oliver, George Demiris, and Paula Baldwin. 2010. The ACTive Intervention in Hospice Interdisciplinary Team Meetings: Exploring Family Caregiver and Hospice Team Communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15, 3: 465-481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Volker Wulf, Claudia Müller, Volkmar Pipek, David Randall, Markus Rhode, and Gunnar Stevens. 2015. Practice-Based Computing. Empirical Ground Conceptionalization Derived from Design Case Studies. In Designing Socially Embedded Technologies in the Real World, Volker Wulf, Kjeld Schmidt, and David Randall (eds.), Springer, London, 111-150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, and Takashi Kudo. 2013. Understanding the Conflicting Demands of Family Caregivers Caring for Depressed Family Members. In Proc. CHI 2013: Changing Perspectives, 2637-2646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2016
    1866 pages
    ISBN:9781450335928
    DOI:10.1145/2818048

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate142of571submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader