ABSTRACT
In this paper we investigate the possibility how to enable transfer of meaningful game information between different video games. We explore the benefits of ontologies as a solution to this problem, and present an initial version of Game Ontology, a first step towards achieving interoperability between games.
- M. Arment. Get rid of the app store's "top" lists, 2013.Google Scholar
- J. August. Topping the charts and racing to the bottom, 2013.Google Scholar
- T. Blackett and R. W. Boad. Co-branding: The science of alliance. Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Carter and M. Gibbs. ESports in EVE Online: Skullduggery, fair play and acceptability in an unbounded competition. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pages 47--54, 2013.Google Scholar
- D. Djaouti, J. Alvarez, J. Jessel, G. Methel, and P. Molinier. Towards a classification of video games. In Artificial and Ambient Intelligence convention (Artificial Societies for Ambient Intelligence), 2007.Google Scholar
- R. Gulati and J. Garino. Get the right mix of bricks & clicks. Harvard Business Review, 78(3):107--114, 1999.Google Scholar
- B. Hochhalter, N. Lichti, J. Zagal, et al. Towards an ontological language for game analysis. 2005.Google Scholar
- W. Prata, A. de Moraes, and M. Quaresma. User's demography and expectation regarding search, purchase and evaluation in mobile application store. Work (Reading, Mass.), 41 Suppl 1:1124--31, Jan. 2012.Google Scholar
- M. O. Riedl and A. Zook. Ai for game production. In Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG), 2013 IEEE Conference on, pages 1--8. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Sotamaa and T. Karppi. Games as services-final report. TRIM Research Reports 2, O. Sotamaa and T. Karppi, 2010.Google Scholar
- T. Tang, G. D. Newton, and X. Wang. Does synergy work? an examination of cross-promotion effects. The International Journal on Media Management, 9(4):127--134, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Uschold and M. Gruninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. The knowledge engineering review, 11(02):93--136, 1996.Google Scholar
- R. E. Van Buskirk and D. L. Wright. Virtual worlds seamless object drop integration, Apr. 8 2010. US Patent App. 12/756,505.Google Scholar
- J. Washburn, B. Till, and R. Priluck. Co-branding: brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7):591--604, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Zagal and A. Bruckman. The game ontology project: Supporting learning while contributing authentically to game studies. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences ICLS 2008, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. P. Zagal and A. Bruckman. Novices, gamers, and scholars: Exploring the challenges of teaching about games. Game Studies, 8(2), 2008.Google Scholar
- J. P. Zagal and M. Mateas. Temporal frames: a unifying framework for the analysis of game temporality. In Situated Play, Proceedings of DiGRA 2007 Conference, pages 516--522, 2007.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards Interoperability in Video Games
Recommendations
An ontology for videogame interoperability
During the last 20 years, video games have become very popular and widely adopted in our society. However, despite the growth on video game industry, there is a lack of interoperability that allow developers to interchange their information freely and ...
The interplay between immersion and appeal in video games
A 2í 2 study on immersion and appeal of video games is presented.Immersion and appeal are found to be highly related.Immersion is found to be unaffected by playing experience.Appeal is found to be affected both by game played and playing experience. ...
Interoperability results for Semantic Web technologies using OWL as the interchange language
Using Semantic Web technologies in complex scenarios requires that such technologies correctly interoperate by interchanging ontologies using the RDF(S) and OWL languages. This interoperability is not straightforward because of the high heterogeneity in ...
Comments