skip to main content
10.1145/2801948.2802010acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sentiment analysis of greek tweets and hashtags using a sentiment lexicon

Published:01 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The rapid growth of social media has rendered opinion and sentiment mining an important area of research with a wide range of applications. We focus on the Greek language and the microblogging platform "Twitter", investigating methods for extracting sentiment of individual tweets as well population sentiment for different subjects (hashtags). The proposed methods are based on a sentiment lexicon. We compare several approaches for measuring the intensity of "Anger", "Disgust", "Fear", "Happiness", "Sadness", and "Surprise". To evaluate the effectiveness of our methods, we develop a benchmark dataset of tweets, manually rated by two humans. Our automated sentiment results seem promising and correlate to real user sentiment. Finally, we examine the variation of sentiment intensity over time for selected hashtags, and associate it with real-world events.

References

  1. Tsakalidis, A., et al. 2014. An Ensemble Model for Cross-Domain Polarity Classification on Twitter. 15th International Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, Proceedings, Part II, (October 12-14, 2014,) 168--177. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11746-1_12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Burnside, G., Papadopoulos, S., and Petkos, G. 2014. D2.3 Social stream mining framework. Social Sensor, Sensing User Generated Input for Improved Media Discovery and Experience. FP7-287975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Paltoglou, G., and Buckley. K. 2013. Subjectivity annotation of the Microblog 2011 Realtime Adhoc relevance judgments. ECIR 2013: 35th European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 344--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Strapparava, C., and Mihalcea, R. 2007. Affective Text. SemEval-2007 Task 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pang, B., and Lee, L. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1-2):1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pak, A., and Paroubek, P. 2010. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proc. of LREC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., and Moore, J. 2011. Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! ICWSM, 11, 538--541Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Triantafyllides G. 1998. Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek. Institute for Modern Greek Studies of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ntais, G., 2006. Development of a Stemmer for the Greek Language, Master Thesis. Stockholm University / Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, E. A. and Shaw, J. Combination of multiple searches. Second Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-2), (Gaitherburg, MD, USA, August 1994), 243--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sentiment analysis of greek tweets and hashtags using a sentiment lexicon

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PCI '15: Proceedings of the 19th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics
      October 2015
      438 pages
      ISBN:9781450335515
      DOI:10.1145/2801948

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PCI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate64of148submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader