skip to main content
research-article

Role-Based Process View Derivation and Composition

Published:02 June 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The process view concept deploys a partial and temporal representation to adjust the visible view of a business process according to various perception constraints of users. Process view technology is of practical use for privacy protection and authorization control in process-oriented business management. Owing to complex organizational structure, it is challenging for large companies to accurately specify the diverse perception of different users over business processes. Aiming to tackle this issue, this article presents a role-based process view model to incorporate role dependencies into process view derivation. Compared to existing process view approaches, ours particularly supports runtime updates to the process view perceivable to a user with specific view merging operations, thereby enabling the dynamic tracing of process perception. A series of rules and theorems are established to guarantee the structural consistency and validity of process view transformation. A hypothetical case is conducted to illustrate the feasibility of our approach, and a prototype is developed for the proof-of-concept purpose.

References

  1. Tony Andrews, Francisco Curbera, Hitesh Dholakia, Yaron Goland, Johannes Klein, Frank Leymann, and Sanjiva Weerawarana. 2003. Business process execution language for web services (BPEL4WS) 1.1. Retrieved May 4, 2015 from https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee251594(v=bts.10).aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ralph Bobrik, Manfred Reichert, and Thomas Bauer. 2007. View-based process visualization. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nadia Busi (Producer). 2006. Process Algebras, Bisimulation (and Logics). Retrieved May 4, 2015 from http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/jv/events/TiC06/B-SLIDES/nb.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Artur Caetano, Marielba Zacarias, António Rito Silva, and José M. Tribolet. 2005. A role-based framework for business process modeling. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dickson K. W. Chiu, S. C. Cheung, Sven Till, Kamalakar Karlapalem, Qing Li, and Eleanna Kafeza. 2004. Workflow view driven cross-organizational interoperability in a web service environment. Information Technology and Management 5, 3--4, 221--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jae Choi, Derek Nazareth, and Hemant Jain. 2013. The impact of SOA implementation on IT-business alignment: A system dynamics approach. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 4, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Guillaume Doux, Frédéric Jouault, and Jean Bézivin. 2009. Transforming BPMN process models to BPEL process definitions with ATL. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Graph-Based Tools.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rik Eshuis and Paul Grefen. 2008. Constructing customized process views. Data and Knowledge Engineering 64, 419--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Diimitrios Georgakopoulos, Mark Hornick, and Amit Sheth. 1995. An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases 3, 2, 119--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shirley Gregor and Alan R. Hevner. 2013. Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly 37, 2, 337--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kevin J. Hoffman, Patrick Eugster, and Suresh Jagannathan. 2009. Semantics-aware trace analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chebbi Issam, Dustdar Schahram, and Tata Samir. 2006. The view-based approach to dynamic inter-organizational workflow cooperation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 56, 2, 139--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Corina Kopka and Ursula Wellen. 2002. Role-Based Views to Approach Suitable Software Process Models for the Development of Multimedia Systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Akhil Kumar and J. Leon Zhao. 1999. Dynamic routing and operational controls in workflow management systems. Management Science 45, 2, 253--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jochen M. Küster, Christian Gerth, Alexander Forster, and Gregor Engels. 2008. A tool for process merging in business-driven development. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering Forum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chengfei Liu, Qing Li, and Xiaohui Zhao. 2008. Challenges and opportunities in collaborative business process management. Information System Frontiers 11, 3, 201--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Duen-Ren Liu and Minxin Shen. 2003. Workflow modeling for virtual processes: An order-preserving process-view approach. Information Systems 28, 6, 505--532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Duen Ren Liu and Minxin Shen. 2004. Business-to-business workflow interoperation based on process-views. Decision Support Systems 38, 3, 399--419. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Axel Martens. 2005. Consistency between executable and abstract processes. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce, and e-Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chun Ouyang, Marlon Dumas, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, and Han Mendling. 2009. From business process models to process-oriented software systems: The BPMN to BPEL way. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 19, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. O. Perrin and C. Godart. 2004. A model to support collaborative work in virtual enterprises. Data & Knowledge Engineering 50, 63--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Manfred Reichert and Peter Dadam. 1998. ADEPTflex: Supporting dynamic changes of workflow without loosing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10, 93--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wasim Sadiq and Maria E. Orlowska. 2000. Analyzing process models using graph reduction techniques. Information Systems 25, 2, 117--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. K. A. Schulz and M. E. Orlowska. 2004. Facilitating cross-organisational workflows with a workflow view approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering 51, 1, 109--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Minxin Shen and Duen-Ren Liu. 2003. Discovering role-relevant process-views for recommending workflow information. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Lynn Shostack. 1984. Designing services that deliver. Harvard Business Review 62, 1, 133--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Edwards Stohr and J. Leon Zhao. 2001. Workflow automation: Overview and research issues. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 3, 281--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Azmat Ullah and Richard Lai. 2013. A systematic review of business and information technology alignment. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 4, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. W. M. P. van der Aalst. 2003. Challenges in business process management: Verification of business processes using Petri nets. The Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science 80, 174--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. W. M. P. van der Aalst and Mathies Weske. 2001. The P2P Approach to Interorganizational Workflows. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Weske, W. M. P. van der Aalst, and H. M. W. Verbeek. 2004. Advances in business process management. Data and Knowledge Engineering 50, 1, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sira Yongchareon, Chengfei Liu, Jian Yu, and Xiaohui Zhao. 2015. A view framework for modeling and change validation of artifact-centric inter-organizational business processes. Information Systems 47, 1, 51--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sira Yongchareon, Xiaohui Zhao, Chengfei Liu, and Marek Kowalkiewicz. 2008. FlexView Manual—Supports for Process View Operations (Technical Report).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. X. Zhao, C. Liu, W. Sadiq, M. Kowalkiewicz, and S. Yongchareon. 2011. Implementing process views in the web service environment. World Wide Web 14, 1, 27--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Xiaohui Zhao and Chengfei Liu. 2010. Steering dynamic collaborations between business processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 40, 4, 743--757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Xiaohui Zhao and Chengfei Liu. 2013. Version management for business process schema evolution. Information Systems 38, 8, 1046--1069. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Xiaohui Zhao, Chengfei Liu, Wasim Sadiq, and Marek Kowalkiewicz. 2008. Process view derivation and composition in a dynamic collaboration environment. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Xiaohui Zhao, Chengfei Liu, Yun Yang, and Wasim Sadiq. 2009. Aligning collaborative business processes: An organisation-oriented perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 39, 6, 1152--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Xiaohui Zhao, Chengfei Liu, Yun Yang, and Wasim Sadiq. 2011. CorPN: Managing instance correspondence in collaborative business processes. Distributed and Parallel Database 29, 4, 309--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Role-Based Process View Derivation and Composition

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
          ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 6, Issue 2
          July 2015
          109 pages
          ISSN:2158-656X
          EISSN:2158-6578
          DOI:10.1145/2780401
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 June 2015
          • Accepted: 1 March 2015
          • Revised: 1 November 2014
          • Received: 1 June 2013
          Published in tmis Volume 6, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader