skip to main content
10.1145/2723576.2723614acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Reducing selection bias in quasi-experimental educational studies

Published:16 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we examine the issue of selection bias in quasi-experimental (non-randomly controlled) educational studies. We provide background about common sources of selection bias and the issues involved in evaluating the outcomes of quasi-experimental studies. We describe two methods, matched sampling and propensity score matching, that can be used to overcome this bias. Using these methods, we describe their application through one case study that leverages large educational datasets drawn from higher education institutional data warehouses. The contribution of this work is the recommendation of a methodology and case study that educational researchers can use to understand, measure, and reduce selection bias in real-world educational interventions.

References

  1. B. Hansen. The prognostic analogue of the propensity score. Biometrika, pages 1--17, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Rosenbaum and D. Rubin. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41--55, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. Rubin. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of educational Psychology, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. R. Shadish, M. H. Clark, and P. M. Steiner. Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484): 1334--1344, Dec. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. M. Steiner, T. D. Cook, W. R. Shadish, and M. H. Clark. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies. Psychological methods, 15(3): 250--67, Sept. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reducing selection bias in quasi-experimental educational studies

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              LAK '15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
              March 2015
              448 pages
              ISBN:9781450334174
              DOI:10.1145/2723576

              Copyright © 2015 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 16 March 2015

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Acceptance Rates

              LAK '15 Paper Acceptance Rate20of74submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader