skip to main content
10.1145/2685553.2699010acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Understanding Data Providers in a Global Scientific Data Hub

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the absence of systematic knowledge about the characteristics and practices of data collections, successful data hubs and other platforms that support collaborative data sharing are unlikely to be designed and built. We begin to fill this gap by performing an in depth case study of a global scientific data hub -- the Encyclopedia of Life -- in which we analyzed the organizational-level identities of 259 data providers and developing a typology of the identities, including: Venerable organizations, Repositories, Citizen science initiatives, Social media platforms, Education communities, and Subsidiaries. This study will provide data aggregation and integration technology designers with background information on data collections.

References

  1. Albert, S. and Whetten, D. (1985). Organizational Identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263--295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gaiji S., et al.(2013) Content assessment of the primary biodiversity data published through GBIF network: Status, Challenges and Potentials. Biodiversity \ Informatics 8 (2): 94--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage. pp: 88--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Parr, C. S., et al. (2014). The Encyclopedia of Life v2: Providing Global Access to Knowledge About Life on Earth. Biodiversity Data Journal, (2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rotman, D., et al. (2012). Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of Life. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1092--1107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. U.S. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century: Report of the National Science Board. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1--10). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Wilson E. O. (2003) The encyclopedia of life. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 77--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Data Providers in a Global Scientific Data Hub

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CSCW'15 Companion: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
            February 2015
            350 pages
            ISBN:9781450329460
            DOI:10.1145/2685553

            Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 February 2015

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            CSCW'15 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CSCW '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader