skip to main content
10.1145/2684200.2684316acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving Engagement in Hypermedia Learning: A Design for Navigation Support

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The traditional hypermedia learning systems (HLS) provide learners with a non-linear navigation of learning content. However, it does not benefit all students as planning for navigation path may cause disorientation. This paper proposes an approach named Skill-Challenge Balancing (SCB) that provides adaptive navigation support for learners to learn within HLS. SCB is designed following the flow theory; a sound psychological theory for describing cognitive engagement in daily life activities. The navigation support is expected to improve learners' engagement in learning within this environment. The approach was demonstrated in a hypermedia learning system for learning Java programming. An experimental study following within-subject design was conducted on 52 students from a higher learning institution in Malaysia to evaluate the effectiveness of SCB approach in improving learners' engagement within HLS. The results of this study suggested that SCB improved learners' engagement within the learning environment.

References

  1. Abdullah, N.A. and Davis, H. 2003. Is simple sequencing simple adaptive hypermedia? In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, ACM, 172--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brusilovsky, P. 2004. KnowledgeTree: A distributed architecture for adaptive e-learning. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, ACM, 104--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1991. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, HarperPerennial, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jolliffe, A., Ritter, J. and Stevens, D. 2001. The online learning handbook: Developing and using web-based learning, Psychology Press, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Katuk, N., Wang, R. and Ryu, H. 2011. Enhancement of learning experience using skill-challenge balancing approach. in AI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 707--716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kopcha, T.J. and Sullivan, H. 2008. Learner preferences and prior knowledge in learner-controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 56(3). 265--286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Krause, K.L. and Coates, H. 2008. Students' engagement in first year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (5), 493--505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Magoulas, G.D., Papanikolaou, Y. and Grigoriadou, M. 2003. Adaptive web-based learning: accommodating individual differences through system's adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology 34(4), 511--527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Park, J., Parsons, D. and Ryu, H. 2010. To flow and not to freeze: Applying flow experience to mobile learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 3(1), 56--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Retalis, S. and Papasalouros, A. 2005. Designing and generating educational adaptive hypermedia applications. Educational Technology & Society 8(3), 26--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Roberts, M. 2010. Teaching in the multilevel classroom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Saade, R. and Bahli, B. 2005. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42(2), 317--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Webster, J., Trevino, L.K. and Ryan, L. 1994. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 9(4), 411--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hsbollah, H. M., and Idris, K. M. 2009. E-learning adoption: the role of relative advantages, trialability and academic specialisation. Campus-Wide Information Systems 26(1), 54--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving Engagement in Hypermedia Learning: A Design for Navigation Support

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        iiWAS '14: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
        December 2014
        587 pages

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 December 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader