skip to main content
10.1145/2683483.2683560acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recognizing Facial Expressions in the Orthogonal Complement of Principal Subspace

Published:14 December 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a novel framework for recognition of facial expressions from a given face image. The framework is based on the assumption that expression information lies in the subspace orthogonal to the subspace representing expression-neutral faces. For deriving the principal subspace of the face images showing no expression, PCA is used as a tool. Then we derive a method to find the orthogonal complement (OC) of the subspace defined by the principal components. It is shown using different tools such as dendrogram and Davies-Bouldin cluster index that the OC of the principal subspace better represents the expressions as compared to the principal subspace in PCA analysis. We have done extensive experiments to validate the recognition capability of the proposed OC space. Two well known publicly available facial expression databases are used for the experiments. We also compare the expression discrimination capability of the OC subspace with some well known features for expression representation. The proposed framework exhibits higher (9.66% on average) recognition capability as compared to the present state-of-the-art works.

References

  1. B. Abboud, F. Davoine, and M. Dand. Facial expression recognition and synthesis based on an appearance model. Signal Processing Image Communication, 19(8):723–740, 2004, doi. 10.1016/j.image.2004.05.009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. Abboud, F. Davoine, and M. Dang. Expressive face recognition and synthesis. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, volume 5, June 2003, doi. 10.1109/CVPRW.2003.10056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Agarwal, M. Chatterjee, and D. P. Mukherjee. Synthesis of emotional expressions specific to facial structure. In The Eighth Indian Conference on Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, December 2012, doi. 10.1145/2425333.2425361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Agarwal, M. Chatterjee, and D. P. Mukherjee. Recognizing facial expressions using a novel shape motion descriptor. In The eighth Indian Conference on Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, December 2012, doi. 10.1145/2425333.2425362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. Aifanti, C. Papachristou, and A. Delopoulos. The mug facial expression database. In Int. Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, pages 76–84, April 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Bartlett, J. Movellan, and T. Sejnowski. Face recognition by independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 13(6):1450–1464, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. J. Calder, A. M. Burton, P. Miller, A. W. Young, and S. Akamatsud. A principal component analysis of facial expressions. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00002-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Darwin. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. IL: Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1872, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. L. Davies and D. W. Bouldin. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1(2):224–227, 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Ekman. Facial expressions. in: T. Dalgleish, M. Power(Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, Wiley, New York, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Girard, J. Cohn, M. Mahoor, S. M. Mavadati, and D. Rosenwald. Social risk and depression: Evidence from manual and automatic facial expression analysis. In The 10th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, April 2013, doi. 10.1109/FG.2013.6553748.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Higham. Computing the polar decompositions-with applications. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 7(4):1160–1174, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Jiang, M. F. Valstar, and M. Pantic. Action unit detection fluing sparse appearance descriptors in space-time video volumes. In IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition and Workshops, pages 314–321, March 2011, doi. 10.1109/FG.2011.5771416.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Kanade, Y. Tian, and J. F. Cohn. Comprehensive database for facial expression analysis. Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, IEEE International Conference on, 0:46, doi. ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/AFGR.2000.840611, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Kaur, R. Vashist, and N. Neeru. Recognition of facial expression with principal component analysis and singular value decomposition. International Journal of Computer Applications, 9, Nov 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Lucey, J. F. Cohn, T. Kanade, and J. Saragih. The extended cohn-kanade dataset (ck+): A complete dataset for action unit and emotion-specified expression. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 94–101, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. D. McDuff, R. E. Kalioubyb, T. Senechal, D. Demirdjian, and R. Picard. Automatic measurement of ad preferences from facial responses gathered over the internet. Image and Vision Computing, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2014.01.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. P. Mukherjee, K. Higashiura, T. Okada, M. Hori, Y.-W. Chen, N. Tomiyama, and Y. Sato. Utilizing disease-specific organ shape components for disease discrimination: Application to discrimination of chronic liver disease from ct data. In MICCAI 2013, Part I, LNCS 8149, pages 235–242, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Y. Saatci and C. Town. Cascaded classification of gender and facial expression using active appearance models. In In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 393–398, April 2006, doi. 10.1109/FGR.2006.29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Shan, S. Gong, and P. W. McOwan. Facial expression recognition based on local binary patterns: A comprehensive study. Image Vision Comput., 27:803–816, May 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Sikka, A. Dhall, and M. Bartlett. Weakly supervised pain localization using multiple instance learning. In FG'13, page NA, 2013, doi. 10.1109/FG.2013.6553762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Sánchez, J. V. Ruiz, A. B. Moreno, A. S. Montemayor, J. Hernández, and J. J. Pantrigo. Differential optical flow applied to automatic facial expression recognition. Neurocomputing, 74:1272–1282, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Tao and X. Tang. Orthogonal complement component analysis for positive samples in svm based relevance feedback image retrieval. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 586–591, 2004, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. U. Tariq, J. Yang, and T. S. Huang. Maximum margin gmm learning for facial expression recognition. In FG'13, page NA, 2013, doi. 10.1109/FG.2013.6553794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. M. Valstar, I. Patras, and M. Pantic. Facial action unit detection using probabilistic actively learned support vector machines on tracked facial point data. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 3, pages 76–84, 2005, doi. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Z. Zhang, M. J. Lyons, M. Schuster, and S. Akamatsu. Comparison between geometry-based and gabor-wavelets-based facial expression recognition using multi-layer perceptron. In IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 454–459, April 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. G. Zhao and M. Pietikäinen. Dynamic texture recognition using local binary patterns with an application to facial expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(6):915–928, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Recognizing Facial Expressions in the Orthogonal Complement of Principal Subspace

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICVGIP '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Indian Conference on Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing
          December 2014
          692 pages
          ISBN:9781450330619
          DOI:10.1145/2683483

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 December 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate95of286submissions,33%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader